Bottom pad pix
#6
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy, what is the water pic up for on the both sides of the pad! Seems like that would keep the props from getting "clean" water???? I'm a rookie, so don't hold that question against me if it is a stupid one!!!!!
#7
Registered
#8
Crazy Energy
Platinum Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I can't see any difference in the 30' pad vs 32' pad. ? except the 32 looks faster
Last edited by Velocity Vector; 09-21-2008 at 07:06 AM.
#9
Registered
The pads are the same width but the pad on the 320 is about as long as the pad on a 22 f00t boat where as for the pad on the 30,it is the correct length for the boat because it was designed and built to be a 30 foot boat.The 320 is a boat that was built out of the mold for the 41 and they just basically made a smaller boat out of it and that is why the running surface on a 320 is so short and there for it is a boat that is very difficult to keep on the pad.The more HP the boat has the better it will stay on the pad in a twin engine set up as for the 320 with a single,Kurt says that it rides at all speeds pretty goog but I will let him comment on it.
#10
Crazy Energy
Platinum Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma God's country no one else wants it.
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Seems like at speed, we are only running on about 3' 4' of pad anyway. So I don't see a longer pad doing anything if it isn't in the water.?