Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Velocity
Bravo One Prop question >

Bravo One Prop question

Notices

Bravo One Prop question

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-14-2012, 02:23 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kansas City,MO.
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do Velocitys need a bow lifting prop. Being flat pad and a fairly high X dim I am confused. I seems that I am draging tab or trimming the bow down to keep from porposing and or beating the boat to death in the rough ass chop......so would a bow lifting prop help or hurt? How differently do the 5 & 4 blades effect the bow lifting?
sparkie124 is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:24 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

I used to have the same problem with the Hydro prop, when I went to the 28 Bravo it improved the ride dramatically.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 10:22 AM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I tried the Bravo late yesterday afternoon and I was pleasantly suprised as I had always heard that Hydros were faster.

Rpms on the Bravo were between 5100 and 5200 rpm I hit a top GPS speed of 72.3mph. This is right in line with my old Hydromotive. However it <Bravo) hooks up faster and does not blow out if I throttle hard from the get go. As I am at the limiter, I am thinking that there might even be a little more in this prop.

Now I am wishing I hadn't waited 13 years to try a Bravo. <g>
Padraig is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 05:23 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its always nice to find a prop that works better!

I think some people on here don't realize that you can't just say "Hydro" prop. They make a standard (non-X) and an "X" and they are different animals. Additionally, they make versions of each with different numbers of blades.

I bought my boat with a Bravo 28 that had bad blow out, awful cruise speed (high slip), and was very prone to chine walk above 70mph. I switched to a Hydro P5X 28 and got better hole shot, higher cruise, more stability at high speed, and higher top speed. Of course, some of that improvement was from the fifth blade. My prop also carries the bow higher.

As I understand it, the "X" Hydro is a bow lifter, the standard Hydro is not. Different animals...
suntimes is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 06:42 PM
  #15  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Smyrna, DE / Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 340
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by suntimes
Its always nice to find a prop that works better!

I think some people on here don't realize that you can't just say "Hydro" prop. They make a standard (non-X) and an "X" and they are different animals. Additionally, they make versions of each with different numbers of blades.

I bought my boat with a Bravo 28 that had bad blow out, awful cruise speed (high slip), and was very prone to chine walk above 70mph. I switched to a Hydro P5X 28 and got better hole shot, higher cruise, more stability at high speed, and higher top speed. Of course, some of that improvement was from the fifth blade. My prop also carries the bow higher.

As I understand it, the "X" Hydro is a bow lifter, the standard Hydro is not. Different animals...
I'm pretty sure when we say Hydro prop most are referring to Q/IV-CL, that seemed to be the favorite OEM for many years. Did you loose top end rpm's? I have heard that merc. props. are a little generous on their advertised specs. I went from 4 blade bravos to P-5 hydros and -2 lowers, both were 30 pitch and lost 500 rpm but ran 77 mph. @ 4700, I'm so confused, is there a lake X around here?
RAPTOR1 is offline  
Old 06-15-2012, 08:20 PM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suntimes
Its always nice to find a prop that works better!

I think some people on here don't realize that you can't just say "Hydro" prop. They make a standard (non-X) and an "X" and they are different animals. Additionally, they make versions of each with different numbers of blades.

I bought my boat with a Bravo 28 that had bad blow out, awful cruise speed (high slip), and was very prone to chine walk above 70mph. I switched to a Hydro P5X 28 and got better hole shot, higher cruise, more stability at high speed, and higher top speed. Of course, some of that improvement was from the fifth blade. My prop also carries the bow higher.

As I understand it, the "X" Hydro is a bow lifter, the standard Hydro is not. Different animals...
What motor are you running????
Padraig is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:17 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 327
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mine came with a 28 Bravo 1 and I'm currently turning it at ~4800-4900 at 72 mph gps (full tank of gas, two adults and two kids, heavy tool kit and gear) with no hints of chine walking. My 290 SC doesn't have external hydraulic steering or trim tabs. This is with a Merc 496 HO (with 1.5 Bravo 1X); my slip is a bit high at ~17%. I measured my propshaft height and, if I remembered correctly, it is about 3.5 inches below the pad. I love the Bravo 1, it takes very little effort to plain and it doesn't blow out...unlike my previous outboard powered velocity 220.
modvp is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 09:12 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
mikes280's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: charlotte nc.
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Padraig
I tried the Bravo late yesterday afternoon and I was pleasantly suprised as I had always heard that Hydros were faster.

Rpms on the Bravo were between 5100 and 5200 rpm I hit a top GPS speed of 72.3mph. This is right in line with my old Hydromotive. However it <Bravo) hooks up faster and does not blow out if I throttle hard from the get go. As I am at the limiter, I am thinking that there might even be a little more in this prop.

Now I am wishing I hadn't waited 13 years to try a Bravo. <g>
is the bravo labed ? i run a 32 labed bravo but i have a non labed one as a back up , the non labed prop has a better cruise speed but the labed prop is faster. My labed prop is a merc. labed one not done by a aftermarket shop. Not saying that is better just stating what it is.
mikes280 is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 10:49 AM
  #19  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Mike, Kenny at Velocity set me up with a guy that had it on a 260 Velocity and it wasn't working well for him. It appears to have been mildly labbed. I have a call in to Kenny to get more info from him. I suspect Mike at Hall's maybe tweaked it some.

I am quite happy with although I need to get out in some rougher water and see how it runs.
Padraig is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 08:30 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Padraig
What motor are you running????
I have a 525 EFI. I lost about 250 rpm with the P5X and my top speed went up about 2 mph. I'm at about 14% slip at top speed and my propshaft is about 3.25 inches below the pad. I've thought about putting on a 1/2" spacer to get less slip (and better mileage) at cruise but I'm not willing to lose much top speed. Just need about 700hp to be where I want to be--90 mph
suntimes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.