Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Velocity
Prop testing on my 280 >

Prop testing on my 280

Notices

Prop testing on my 280

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-23-2021, 07:20 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default Prop testing on my 280

I finally had some decent water to do some prop testing over the last couple weekends. I've been running a Bblades labbed Bravo 1 30p 4 blade. It runs pretty good with 4 or more people and a full tank to hold the boat in the water typically 80+. By myself it wants to chine walk something terrible. I also run more trim than my old Hydromotive 27p QIV. I put the QIV back on and I use almost half the trim and by myself I can run faster with no chine walk. The problem I have with both is that I can break them loose pretty easy, especially the QIV. In real rough water the QIV will break loose and I have to come to a stop before I can get it to bite again. It's apparent that the Bravo 1 is not designed for the Velocity's pad bottom, too much stern lift. The QIV is more of a cleaver style and I think a 5 blade version is what the boat wants with a little more pitch. I've had Bblades lab a different B1 prop for me in the past and the boat was almost unusable it handled so bad. It porpoised more than flipper in flat water. What has everyone else found?
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 08-23-2021, 03:04 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I can't remember what power you have. My old 280 always ran faster with the hydromotive 4 blade then a bravo 1 both mid range and top end. I had a mostly stock 502. The only times it would break loose is if caught in crazy wakes and wash in a poker run. The hydro is srern lifting and the bravo more of a bow lifting prop. I am running a hydromotive P 5 on my VR 1 and pleased with it however the VR 1 runs different then the 280. If you haven't done so, give Tom at hrdromotive a call. Good guy and knowledgeable. Another thought is maybe BBladex 4 speed prop.

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Old 08-24-2021, 07:22 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Padraig
I can't remember what power you have. My old 280 always ran faster with the hydromotive 4 blade then a bravo 1 both mid range and top end. I had a mostly stock 502. The only times it would break loose is if caught in crazy wakes and wash in a poker run. The hydro is srern lifting and the bravo more of a bow lifting prop. I am running a hydromotive P 5 on my VR 1 and pleased with it however the VR 1 runs different then the 280. If you haven't done so, give Tom at hrdromotive a call. Good guy and knowledgeable. Another thought is maybe BBladex 4 speed prop.

Padraig
How far is your prop shaft below the pad, mine is about 4"? My Hydro has a short hub without the flair so it doesn't have any stern lift. I actually sat down with Tom, his shop is near some of my clients and I used to pass through Twinsburg often. Although the last few times I stopped by their office it was closed. I know they were having problems finding a new foundry. My experience with Bblades wasn't good. I had them straighten a blade that was out .100 and lab a prop for over $700. I got it back in October so I couldn't test it. Tested it the next spring and it was horrible couldn't even use it. I called and they wanted another $350 to fix it. Got it back and it wasn't much better. I ended up trading it for my current B1 30p. I'm thinking hard about trying out a Cutting Edge 5 blade, they are half the price of Hydromotive and they will work with you.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 08-25-2021, 09:53 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

My prop is approx 3.5 inches below the pad..
It might be worthwhile to talk to Scott at Velocity.

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Old 09-13-2021, 02:16 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

Ran the BBlades prop slip calculator and my labbed 30P is at 26%. Have to get numbers on my Hydormotive and see where it's at. I have to run the 30P Bravo with a lot of trim to settle down the chine walk, which could be part of the problem.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 09-14-2021, 10:39 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Revelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Warwick, MD USA
Posts: 670
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

You should be 15% slip or less for a well set up Velocity hull. Your Bravo prop shouldn't require twice as much trim as the Hydro - something is not right there. A 28" Bravo spinning faster may work better than 30".
Revelocity is offline  
Old 09-15-2021, 07:00 AM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Revelocity;4805607]You should be 15% slip or less for a well set up Velocity hull. Your Bravo prop shouldn't require twice as much trim as the Hydro - something is not right there. A 28" Bravo spinning faster may work better than 30".[

If my Hydro would stay hooked up it would be great. In rough water or turns it blows out and I have to drop off plane to get it to bite again. I’m looking into a 28P Cutting Edge 5 blade.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 10-01-2021, 09:32 AM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

When I had my 280 I ran a few props but ended up bouncing back and forth between the 32 bravo 1 and a 34 bravo 1. The 34 never felt right and was told it did not match the rest of the smaller bravo's. I would spin the 32 to 6000-6100 and you definitely had to be zoned in because it would chine walk if I was in the boat by myself. I never tried any 5 blades because I had so many outdrive issues with the 4 blade I figured the 5 blade would make things worse. The boat would have probably benefited from the 5 blade setup and perhaps calmed things down at higher speeds.
cp5899 is offline  
Old 09-06-2023, 06:20 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Padraig
I can't remember what power you have. My old 280 always ran faster with the hydromotive 4 blade then a bravo 1 both mid range and top end. I had a mostly stock 502. The only times it would break loose is if caught in crazy wakes and wash in a poker run. The hydro is srern lifting and the bravo more of a bow lifting prop. I am running a hydromotive P 5 on my VR 1 and pleased with it however the VR 1 runs different then the 280. If you haven't done so, give Tom at hrdromotive a call. Good guy and knowledgeable. Another thought is maybe BBladex 4 speed prop.

Padraig
Hey padraig,what pitch & diameter p5 prop are you running on your Vr1?,i recently repowered mine & am testing props,i have a borrowed labbed 29 p5 from kenny.Tried a bravo 1 30pitch & it had 20.6 % slip.Also what kind of power is in your VR?
Smith500 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.