![]() |
Originally Posted by slboatdrinks
(Post 2089932)
Hmmm, Miller Lite?
|
Originally Posted by Texomapowerboater
I have heard of alot of step boats spinning out at low speeds due to the step - especially sunsation
|
Originally Posted by slboatdrinks
(Post 2089911)
As far as rough water ride, I'll take you for a spin on the 33 in some 8 to 10's at 45 mph and you can be the judge. :D
|
Originally Posted by OCDACTIVE
(Post 2090218)
I think they are fine the way they are, but it does seem that steps are the next consideration for a design change. Does anyone know if that is in the works?
|
wait for the 43:D
|
28ft when on plane barely has a running surface. No real need for a step.
btw, are you looking for a performance boat or a comfortable cruiser? A nice straight DeepV will give a nice soft ride... or are you looking to be the fastest out there... needing a step, cuz then you should be looking at an activator. |
Originally Posted by cosmic12
(Post 2090292)
If you are refering to the 28, I wouldn't count on it. Like the man says why mess with perfection:D
|
1 Attachment(s)
like I said before, you don't need it. where do you think it should be put? On the transom?
|
The 28 is and will remain a true deep-V. However, I've entertained the thought a few times for the DDC.
I disagree that the DDC will not work in a smaller boat. We had it in our 22 Banshee and it was great! No doubt the Challenger rides equally well. The biggest reason we don't do it is the return on the investment is not there. Right now smaller boats aren't selling so we are focusing on the larger products and the larger projects, i.e. 43. Plus, honestly, the 28 runs so great as is there is not a real desire to mess with it! At 75 mph it is on 'rails'. With a step and 80+ it is a guess. Hope this helps. Pat |
ok you brought it up! Where are the Banshee's
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.