Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Active Thunder (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/active-thunder-30/)
-   -   MercRacing 565. (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/active-thunder/283749-mercracing-565-a.html)

JaStein 08-29-2012 09:27 AM

MercRacing 565.
 
Cult

It seems as though I've found small home here on the AT forum, I feel as though I fit best with this clique of human beings. I've friended some on Facebook (Pete, Scott), even one on LinkedIn (Scott, great professional networking website). With all of the new marine technology coming out in recent months I find myself wondeing what everyone thinks about the new 565 BB from Mercury Racing? Has any tested it out? Any positive or negative results? Regardless, I appreciate how open and welcoming this board has been, some aren't as much to youngsters like myself, thanks'.

Josh

Sydwayz 08-29-2012 10:17 AM

There have been a few threads on them in the General Discussion. BLee has them in his new 2012 90+mph Top Gun. "Some" of them were "recalled" early in the summer. There's a thread about it.

Our Merc reps/friends have been singing their praises, and we like that. I anticipate seeing some 565 action in an AT hull in the near future.

Gladhe8er 08-29-2012 10:38 AM

There have been some impressive results with that engine in the 29 OL and 24 Nordic cat. Not the prettiest engine, but it seems to be a stout performer.

SVT 08-29-2012 11:25 AM

With the proven track record the 525 has I see no reason this motor will be anything short of awesome

Knot 4 Me 08-29-2012 12:36 PM

After seeing a few in person now (29 OL, 400SS Formula) I don't hate the look of them as much as I did in pics when they first debuted.

rssteiny 08-29-2012 04:58 PM

I dont think ther bad looking and you can choose from 11 colors, as for the 565hp that is about the same as the 525 as they are in the 560 hp range.

ActiveThunder 08-29-2012 05:26 PM

More HP and torque like a 600. Direct conversation with Kevin Skiba at Hi-perf and Brad Halpin my local rep. I'm putting them in a new 37 so will know everything there is soon. One thing however, DTS or fly by wire only. No more hard shifts or unsynced engines! (so I am told)

Turn the key and go!

Sydwayz 08-29-2012 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3765271)
More HP and torque like a 600. Direct conversation with Kevin Skiba at Hi-perf and Brad Halpin my local rep. I'm putting them in a new 37 so will know everything there is soon. One thing however, DTS or fly by wire only. No more hard shifts or unsynced engines! (so I am told)

Turn the key and go!

Way to let the cat out of the bag! Work with me Bro! :D. :drink:

boatfreak 08-29-2012 07:24 PM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3765271)
Turn the key and go!

Ahhhh if I only had a nickle...........:grinser010:

REMEDY 08-30-2012 06:46 AM

Im sure it will be a good package but the power isnt what you think it is.... The 525 is 502 cubic inches. The 565 is 532 cubic inches. The power per cubic inch is the same. Do the math. So they didnt do anything to make it more efficient. Same manifold, they blocked the front and put 2 throttle bodies on top. It has the new ecu the 1100/1350 has. So of course no one can get into it. The electronic shift and drive by wire is nice. Until you need to buy parts. Again it is a nice step up without a blower but they could have done more.

REMEDY 08-30-2012 07:00 AM


Originally Posted by rssteiny (Post 3765254)
I dont think ther bad looking and you can choose from 11 colors, as for the 565hp that is about the same as the 525 as they are in the 560 hp range.

560 on a hot rod dyno. Realistic is 540. So my guess is the 565 will make prob 580. Good power without a blower for sure. Only a small improvement in power per cube. The blue engines always make at least what they advertise and usually more.

rssteiny 08-30-2012 07:53 AM

Souds like a sweet set up if the price is comprable to the 525 package.

outriggers 08-30-2012 07:57 AM

It looks like they increased the stoke by .25 inch. To bring it up to 533 CID. Keep in mind you have to run 89 min fuel in the 565 as opposed to reg 87 in the 525. I figure they bumped the timing up on the 565 because the compression is actually .05 less than the 8.75 that's on the 525. I know there are 525's out there that are in the 600 bracket depending on what has been done. I like the idea of being able to run reg 87 but 89 seems to be easier to find on the water than 91+. Doug

REMEDY 08-30-2012 09:06 AM

Im sure the price is alot higher. Merc never goes backwards. On the merc blog Fred Keikhafer did say they are a little disappointed with the sales numbers but thats because of the weak economy in the market that engine is intended for. The 1100/1350 is selling like hot cakes. That engine is the most impressive thing they have ever produced.

verbi69 08-30-2012 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3765741)
Im sure the price is alot higher. Merc never goes backwards. On the merc blog Fred Keikhafer did say they are a little disappointed with the sales numbers but thats because of the weak economy in the market that engine is intended for. The 1100/1350 is selling like hot cakes. That engine is the most impressive thing they have ever produced.

The 565 or the 1350 is the most impressive thing they have ever produced?

REMEDY 08-30-2012 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by verbi69 (Post 3766042)
The 565 or the 1350 is the most impressive thing they have ever produced?

The 1350. Im not real impressed with the 565.

ActiveThunder 08-30-2012 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3766120)
The 1350. Im not real impressed with the 565.

Why not?

REMEDY 08-31-2012 04:28 AM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3766172)
Why not?

Because all they really did was make the engine bigger for more power. 580-600 is very easy to obtain reliably out of 502 cubic inches. A few cylinder head and manifold changes and a 525 makes 600 on 87 octane. I did it. On 240 hour short blocks. With that said im sure the electronic drive by wire and shifting is going to be awesome. Sync will be nice. Hope the throttle response is as good as a 525. Let us know.

outriggers 08-31-2012 07:08 AM

They also turn the 565 up 200 rpm over the 525. It should be a great package. But you you really can't compare it to a quad cam twin turbo 1100/1350,To totally different beasts $$$$. The electronic shifting and sync should be very nice. Doug

verbi69 08-31-2012 11:07 AM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3766432)
Because all they really did was make the engine bigger for more power. 580-600 is very easy to obtain reliably out of 502 cubic inches. A few cylinder head and manifold changes and a 525 makes 600 on 87 octane. I did it. On 240 hour short blocks. With that said im sure the electronic drive by wire and shifting is going to be awesome. Sync will be nice. Hope the throttle response is as good as a 525. Let us know.

pm sent.

REMEDY 08-31-2012 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by outriggers (Post 3766463)
They also turn the 565 up 200 rpm over the 525. It should be a great package. But you you really can't compare it to a quad cam twin turbo 1100/1350,To totally different beasts $$$$. The electronic shifting and sync should be very nice. Doug

Oh yeah... no comparison. The quad cam is a veey cutting edge package. From some internal pics and stuff they utilize Latest race technology. Thats why it surprises me they wouldnt have made some more improvements the the n/a big block.

REMEDY 08-31-2012 11:42 AM

A 37 with a pair of 1100's.... hmmm! :eekdrop:

JUPITER PULSARE 08-31-2012 04:04 PM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3766641)
A 37 with a pair of 1100's.... hmmm! :eekdrop:

At that point...why stop at 1100's???

A 37 with a pair of 1350's!!!!

REMEDY 08-31-2012 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by JUPITER PULSARE (Post 3766822)
At that point...why stop at 1100's???

A 37 with a pair of 1350's!!!!

I like the way you think...

1980Condor460 08-31-2012 06:49 PM

Has anyone put 6's on the back of a 37? I don't think the XR's or BMAX's will handle 1350 a side........

AJ POWERPLAY 09-10-2012 05:35 AM

http://www.boats.com/blog/wp-content...-565-model.jpg

man, tough crowd... I thought they looked sweet, and honestly I'd LOVE to have a pair in my boat

laszlo01 09-10-2012 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by JUPITER PULSARE (Post 3766822)
At that point...why stop at 1100's???

A 37 with a pair of 1350's!!!!

Would realy like to see the 42 with 1350's and Arnesons. Now that would be a sight to see running.

HTRDLNCN 09-10-2012 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3766638)
Oh yeah... no comparison. The quad cam is a veey cutting edge package. From some internal pics and stuff they utilize Latest race technology. Thats why it surprises me they wouldnt have made some more improvements the the n/a big block.


probably because it would cut into their supercharged engine sales..
Even N/A a quad cam big cube engine would make 650-700hp easily..

Gladhe8er 09-10-2012 09:19 AM


Originally Posted by 1980Condor460 (Post 3766892)
Has anyone put 6's on the back of a 37? I don't think the XR's or BMAX's will handle 1350 a side........

The 37 Outlaw race boat had 6's I believe. the 1350's need the M8 drive.

4bus 09-10-2012 09:37 AM


Originally Posted by REMEDY (Post 3766432)
Because all they really did was make the engine bigger for more power. 580-600 is very easy to obtain reliably out of 502 cubic inches. A few cylinder head and manifold changes and a 525 makes 600 on 87 octane. I did it. On 240 hour short blocks. With that said im sure the electronic drive by wire and shifting is going to be awesome. Sync will be nice. Hope the throttle response is as good as a 525. Let us know.

Sure, that is easy to do to a 525.....now warranty it for the guy that will get in his boat and hold it wide open for an hours at a time :D There are many that are not mechanincally inclined, that buy these boats and run them hard. Increasing cubes and air flow was the safe way to get more power out of this platform, and it probably still soots the transom...which is safe :lolhit:

Say what you will, but I still believe that there are smarter guys at merc than some give credit too.

REMEDY 09-10-2012 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by 4bus (Post 3773386)
Sure, that is easy to do to a 525.....now warranty it for the guy that will get in his boat and hold it wide open for an hours at a time :D There are many that are not mechanincally inclined, that buy these boats and run them hard. Increasing cubes and air flow was the safe way to get more power out of this platform, and it probably still soots the transom...which is safe :lolhit:

Say what you will, but I still believe that there are smarter guys at merc than some give credit too.

I think they have a whole team of smart people... my stuff is basically stock with better heads and manifold. Stock comp, timing, cam etc. Nothing on kill. I can leave it wot all day. The stock 525 is rich until wot full load then a bit lean with mercs stock tune.

I just think they could have done better with a BBC based na engine. But I'm not so sure the market is there in this economy.

REMEDY 09-10-2012 02:08 PM


Originally Posted by HTRDLNCN (Post 3773342)
probably because it would cut into their supercharged engine sales..
Even N/A a quad cam big cube engine would make 650-700hp easily..

That would prob make a great replacement for the 700. Probably last forever too!

ActiveThunder 09-10-2012 06:16 PM

I will verify but I believe Merc is building the 502 block themselves.

After Obama bailed out GM I think all we coulda got from them is welfare motors. :party-smiley-004:

Sydwayz 09-10-2012 06:39 PM

The 565 leaves a lot to be desired in the looks department, but I believe the engine cover is a blank canvas to make the motors match the boat's paint and graphics.

hint hint!! :drink:

REMEDY 09-10-2012 09:36 PM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3773745)
I will verify but I believe Merc is building the 502 block themselves.

After Obama bailed out GM I think all we coulda got from them is welfare motors. :party-smiley-004:

GM performance is still going strong with lots of 502 block crate engines avail. Blocks will be available forever. Pretty sure 565 is the same just 4.250 stroke. 454 bore (4.250) blocks are gone... hence no 496 anymore. I'm sure the EPA and treehuggers and Obama will figure out how to squash this stuff eventually. Our boats will be required to get 54.6 MPG. Lol

LAriverratt 09-11-2012 07:14 AM


Originally Posted by ajfisher (Post 3773257)
http://www.boats.com/blog/wp-content...-565-model.jpg

man, tough crowd... I thought they looked sweet, and honestly I'd LOVE to have a pair in my boat

:stupid::lolhit::whistle::party-smiley-004:

AJ POWERPLAY 09-11-2012 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3773745)
After Obama bailed out GM I think all we coulda got from them is welfare motors. :party-smiley-004:

At least a good portion of that was paid back... How much did we get back from wallstreet? ... And they got 10 times more! :)

REMEDY 09-11-2012 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by ajfisher (Post 3774214)
At least a good portion of that was paid back... How much did we get back from wallstreet? ... And they got 10 times more! :)

They will never pay it back... and the raping continues!

ActiveThunder 09-11-2012 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by ajfisher (Post 3773257)
http://www.boats.com/blog/wp-content...-565-model.jpg

man, tough crowd... I thought they looked sweet, and honestly I'd LOVE to have a pair in my boat

Totally agree. Everybody that has walked in and has seen them has been in total awe!

People just hate change. Well, maybe the 1600 Penns. Ave address excluded.....

Sydwayz 09-11-2012 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by ActiveThunder (Post 3774673)
Totally agree. Everybody that has walked in and has seen them has been in total awe!

People just hate change. Well, maybe the 1600 Penns. Ave address excluded.....

Easy now Reverend! We don't want this moved to the politics forum! :hijack:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.