prochargers good or bad
#11
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
thanks for the info, on other threads, all i heard were terrible things about these superchargers, it has a m1 procharger
#12
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I did notice the pull when hit the throttle , it was a nice feeling. This plenty enough power for me
#13
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
Start here.
http://www.jegs.com/s/tech-articles/...+-+Centrifugal
Everyone has an opinion. I would consider doing a roots type (Whipple) for example to be more reliable. Personally, I view all of them as time bombs. There's a lot more to it than bolting on a "blower" and mashing the throttles. Some engines are good candidates for supercharging and some not so much. Then you need to have outdrives that can handle the extra power. Some hulls respond better to throwing power at them better than others.
A lot of people in this hobby enjoy engine building, chasing a speed goal, racing, etc. I enjoy going fast as well, but I'm a bigger fan of stock reliability. For me it's stock black motors and family fun on the water. For the next guy it's helmets, Life Line jackets and breaking the 150 MPH mark. To each their own.
http://www.jegs.com/s/tech-articles/...+-+Centrifugal
Everyone has an opinion. I would consider doing a roots type (Whipple) for example to be more reliable. Personally, I view all of them as time bombs. There's a lot more to it than bolting on a "blower" and mashing the throttles. Some engines are good candidates for supercharging and some not so much. Then you need to have outdrives that can handle the extra power. Some hulls respond better to throwing power at them better than others.
A lot of people in this hobby enjoy engine building, chasing a speed goal, racing, etc. I enjoy going fast as well, but I'm a bigger fan of stock reliability. For me it's stock black motors and family fun on the water. For the next guy it's helmets, Life Line jackets and breaking the 150 MPH mark. To each their own.
if you have time could you take a look and tell me your opinion.
The site is: http://www.procharger.com/marine/M_t...imonials.shtml
It sounds like a decent one. It was already on the boat when I bought it. Please give me your opinion it is m1
thank you
#14
Registered

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 2
From: Northern, KY (Cincinnati) Lake St Clair, MI Norris Lake, TN
I read the article, and looked my unit up online. From my novice experience and lack of motor knowledge. The oneI have seems to be a safew choice for me.
if you have time could you take a look and tell me your opinion.
The site is: http://www.procharger.com/marine/M_t...imonials.shtml
It sounds like a decent one. It was already on the boat when I bought it. Please give me your opinion it is m1
thank you
if you have time could you take a look and tell me your opinion.
The site is: http://www.procharger.com/marine/M_t...imonials.shtml
It sounds like a decent one. It was already on the boat when I bought it. Please give me your opinion it is m1
thank you
#15
Registered

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 579
Likes: 15
I ran a ProCharger M1 with 3lbs of boost for over 200 hours on a 496Mag.... never had a single issue.... went from turning a 24 Bravo at 5000 to turning a 28 bravo @5000 ....easily 10-12 mph gain.... no loss of fuel mileage under 4000 rpm's.... no change to the mannerisms of the stock 496... done right its the best $5000 you can spend for 10-12 mph imo....
#16
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I am not an expert in engines. My opinion would get you a cup of coffee, along with $2. I've read that before. quotes like “I like it. It’s really a good, easy bolt on” are what scare me. I don't view superchargeing in any from as a way to prolong an engine's life, quite the opposite. Therefore they do not intrest me.
#17
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I am not an expert in engines. My opinion would get you a cup of coffee, along with $2. I've read that before. quotes like “I like it. It’s really a good, easy bolt on” are what scare me. I don't view superchargeing in any from as a way to prolong an engine's life, quite the opposite. Therefore they do not intrest me.
#18
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I ran a ProCharger M1 with 3lbs of boost for over 200 hours on a 496Mag.... never had a single issue.... went from turning a 24 Bravo at 5000 to turning a 28 bravo @5000 ....easily 10-12 mph gain.... no loss of fuel mileage under 4000 rpm's.... no change to the mannerisms of the stock 496... done right its the best $5000 you can spend for 10-12 mph imo....
#19
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I am not an expert in engines. My opinion would get you a cup of coffee, along with $2. I've read that before. quotes like “I like it. It’s really a good, easy bolt on” are what scare me. I don't view superchargeing in any from as a way to prolong an engine's life, quite the opposite. Therefore they do not intrest me.
#20
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Dunkirk ny
I am not an expert in engines. My opinion would get you a cup of coffee, along with $2. I've read that before. quotes like “I like it. It’s really a good, easy bolt on” are what scare me. I don't view superchargeing in any from as a way to prolong an engine's life, quite the opposite. Therefore they do not intrest me.


