Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Baja
Baja Islander 272 - performance expectations? >

Baja Islander 272 - performance expectations?

Notices

Baja Islander 272 - performance expectations?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-23-2014 | 05:17 PM
  #111  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Exhaust! Your losing 50 hp of your projected 500 with the stock set up. And your very daring running that cam with a 110 LSA having water mix so close to the engine. You might be sucking some back putting out some of that fire!
I figured I'm giving up about 50hp to the manifolds, and haven't really been running it until I get a real exhaust, but I hadn't considered it actually snuffing the engine. Is that a real possibility? From some generic calculations I'm currently putting out about 350hp.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2014 | 11:33 AM
  #112  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Slapout, Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
So...tested the new prop over the weekend.

23p 4 blade Revolution 4.
~60g of fuel on board.
Fresh drive fluid
Drive shower trimmed up
3 adults and an ice chest
Bimini top folded up on the front windshield
Huge tube tied to the back sun deck
80* weather on a slightly choppy lake

Top speed squeezed out was 54mph at an indicated 4800rpm
No blowout to speak of!

The new prop felt great - nice shot out of the hole, handles way better, much more responsive to speed adjustments, and even docked/loaded up easier as well. It achieved the 50 mph mark much much easier than it did with the M+. I was pretty stoked with the performance of the prop, but was hoping for just a bit more top speed.

It looks like that may be all this boat has got. The motor is an Eagle 502, so that should be a reliable part of the equation. I had a few toys on board, from the reviews that I've seen have shown this boat to go 60-65mph with the stock 454. I otherwise love the boat.
I am getting 52mph out of a 277 with a 496 Mag and a 19p Rev 4.....At around 4600 to 4700 RPMS..

Have a M+ 23p sitting in the garage....Previous owner said it would get around 60-61 out of it....I may have it labbed and try it out...
j21black is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2014 | 10:03 AM
  #113  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I've procured a nice set of headers and sending the carb and distributor out for professional tuning. I'm sure that dumping these manifolds should solve a lot of my problems. I'll keep you all posted.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 11-22-2014 | 08:12 PM
  #114  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Well I may have found part of my problem. It looks like the wrong adaptor plate for my square bore to the spread bore manifold, and to top it off the way way the Quickfuel carb is rigged it was mounted backwards so the 1-3/4" secondaries were trying to squeeze through these teeny 1-1/4" holes.

Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 12-03-2014 | 08:48 AM
  #115  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Default

That would do it!
BajaDan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-03-2014 | 09:21 AM
  #116  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Hudson, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
Well I may have found part of my problem. It looks like the wrong adaptor plate for my square bore to the spread bore manifold, and to top it off the way way the Quickfuel carb is rigged it was mounted backwards so the 1-3/4" secondaries were trying to squeeze through these teeny 1-1/4" holes.

Good luck, hopefully that frees up some ponies, I assume it'll be next summer before you get to find out...
RiReuter is offline  
Reply
Old 12-03-2014 | 12:05 PM
  #117  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Until spring at least. Sucks,lol. Up here in NorCal I could probably drop her in around march which still gives me a month or two of tuning before the season really opens up. I sent the carb and distributor off for a custom tune so along with the new headers I bought this will be a whole new boat - super stoked!

I checked the bottom too for straightness and it looked perfect. This should be a fun summer.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 12-04-2014 | 07:32 PM
  #118  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 9
Default

That's great baja rooster, I bet that's 90% of your problem right there.
Mines fuel injected so if something did go wrong...I'm screwed. Lol
Can't wait to see how this works out for you.
I did the straightedge thing on my hull too, I do have a slight hook...probably an 1/8" but still I didn't like that, but oh well.
I'll be waiting to see things go for you.
Tom272Baja is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2014 | 10:42 PM
  #119  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I sent the carb out to a specialty shop and it turns out that it had the wrong body on it. I didn't quite understand the nuances of the problem other than it was an 830 body on an 850 set up. All I know is that it's just another area for improvement.

In some ways I'm glad that spacer was on there as I didn't know that I was having fuel starvation issues. (3-4 pounds at wot). It may of very well spared my motor working as a rev limiter/air restrictor.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-2015 | 06:00 PM
  #120  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

So I'm taping off the u-joints/spline to wash and paint the outdrive and find this little gem engraved into the casing.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.