Sunkin Ejection Stories
05-18-2010, 08:07 PM
#61
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-18-2010, 08:19 PM
#62
Oh... so now it's guilty until someone proves themself innocent to Alec? Who the phuck do you think you are?
Who am I ?
I'm the guy that caught him.
I didnt put one word in his mouth. He produced the proof that he knew about it.
He produced the false bank statement.
I had no part in any of it.
The difference now is, lots of people acknowledge that he did all that and say " so what, move on "
You on the other hand , deny anything happened.
Stecz offered an audit.
People are now asking for it.
He says the paypal acct added to 2700 plus and with paypal fees was reduced to 2649.
Others have said they know about checks being sent.
Forget the checks for now. Prove that Steczs numbers are correct.
And John, quit twisting words here, no one is asking for names to be made public. Nice diversion tactic.
You guys offered the audit. Again all in your own words.
Who am I ?
I'm the guy that caught him.
I didnt put one word in his mouth. He produced the proof that he knew about it.
He produced the false bank statement.
I had no part in any of it.
The difference now is, lots of people acknowledge that he did all that and say " so what, move on "
You on the other hand , deny anything happened.
Stecz offered an audit.
People are now asking for it.
He says the paypal acct added to 2700 plus and with paypal fees was reduced to 2649.
Others have said they know about checks being sent.
Forget the checks for now. Prove that Steczs numbers are correct.
And John, quit twisting words here, no one is asking for names to be made public. Nice diversion tactic.
You guys offered the audit. Again all in your own words.
05-18-2010, 08:24 PM
#63
Yup,
And they will run that "charity bilking scumbag" and his minions right out of the sport.
He can't escape his past actions, neither can the ones who try to cover it up. It's Biblical!!!!!!!!
"They sow the wind, and they reap the whirlwind."
And they will run that "charity bilking scumbag" and his minions right out of the sport.
He can't escape his past actions, neither can the ones who try to cover it up. It's Biblical!!!!!!!!
"They sow the wind, and they reap the whirlwind."
Last edited by Comanche3Six; 05-18-2010 at 09:39 PM.
05-18-2010, 08:47 PM
#64
Gold Member
I seriously doubt the charity would be very impressed, if presented with a doctored bank statement that was made up to support their contribution proceeds. I doubt they'd be very impressed with the character either.
The main goal of some is to hope this all blows over, and they can continue to promote a site despite the alleged owner's behavior and character. Maybe they secretly hope he just goes away. Either way, nothing's been disproved, many things have been laid out in black and white. People go out of their way not to mention the fact that the many misstatements made by the so-called owner of the site they probably know about. The issue of the hosted site servers never garnered much of a comeback either.
I'd have to agree with Alec here. The reaction of those that choose to ignore the facts of the situation is pretty seedy. Eeeeeeeewwwwwww that smell.
The main goal of some is to hope this all blows over, and they can continue to promote a site despite the alleged owner's behavior and character. Maybe they secretly hope he just goes away. Either way, nothing's been disproved, many things have been laid out in black and white. People go out of their way not to mention the fact that the many misstatements made by the so-called owner of the site they probably know about. The issue of the hosted site servers never garnered much of a comeback either.
I'd have to agree with Alec here. The reaction of those that choose to ignore the facts of the situation is pretty seedy. Eeeeeeeewwwwwww that smell.
05-18-2010, 09:12 PM
#65
05-18-2010, 09:14 PM
#66
Registered
iTrader: (1)
/ˈslændər/ Show Spelled[slan-der] Show IPA
–noun
1.defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2.a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.
3.Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
–verb (used with object)
4.to utter slander against; defame.
–verb (used without object)
5.to utter or circulate slander.
Use slander in a Sentence
See images of slander
Search slander on the Web
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Origin:
1250–1300; (n.) ME s(c)laundre < AF esclaundre, OF esclandre, alter. of escandle < LL scandalum cause of offense, snare (see scandal); (v.) ME s(c)laundren to cause to lapse morally, bring to disgrace, discredit, defame < OF esclandrer, deriv. of esclandre
05-18-2010, 09:59 PM
#67
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
[QUOTE=Marginmn;3113668]Well if Chris Sunkin actually was the mega rich, multifaceted successful business man that he made himself out to be his lawyers would have long since filed slander/defamation charges.
I highly doubt Chris is mega rich or even kinda rich, I would say he is just getting buy! He lied about what he had owned, what he has done, and what he does and used that to make a offshore boating site!! he has yet to come one here and disprove anything that was said against him or any or the charges that were laid out! If he had the boat he talked about he would have come one here and disproved everything that was writtin!! I reallly dont care one way or the other but I think the 15 members on his site that post should take a hard look at what Chris has done and what he said, if they want to stay there and believe his B.S. that is thier choice, good for them. I dont think they should come over hear and keep sticking up for him, but it is there choice, this is a dead topic, Chris lied, He looks like a ass, his site is dead and we wont see him this Summer standing on the dock with his life jacket waiting for a free ride!! To everyone that boats or has a boat see you on the water
I highly doubt Chris is mega rich or even kinda rich, I would say he is just getting buy! He lied about what he had owned, what he has done, and what he does and used that to make a offshore boating site!! he has yet to come one here and disprove anything that was said against him or any or the charges that were laid out! If he had the boat he talked about he would have come one here and disproved everything that was writtin!! I reallly dont care one way or the other but I think the 15 members on his site that post should take a hard look at what Chris has done and what he said, if they want to stay there and believe his B.S. that is thier choice, good for them. I dont think they should come over hear and keep sticking up for him, but it is there choice, this is a dead topic, Chris lied, He looks like a ass, his site is dead and we wont see him this Summer standing on the dock with his life jacket waiting for a free ride!! To everyone that boats or has a boat see you on the water
05-18-2010, 10:00 PM
#68
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for who is getting bashed. John.
05-18-2010, 10:45 PM
#69
"sensitized to the recent round of personal attacks posing as righteous attempts to save the industry from a terrible person. "
He's not being bashed as much as being held accountable for his position.
To date his explanation is void of logic.
05-19-2010, 12:15 AM
#70
VIP Member
Alec runs this site too now. He can unlock what you want. He pays the cost to be the boss. He will destroy anything for his own agenda. And he will try to hurt anyone.
"until there is proof that 2650 is the total collected"
Oh... so now it's guilty until someone proves themself innocent to Alec? Who the phuck do you think you are?
Alec should talk to the charity and ask about the inquiry regarding all these individual donors. Ask how they feel about his campaign, the related components of a takeover attempt, and whether they think it is appropriate donor to donor relations.
In fact, if I were the director and the doctor... would want to hear from everyone on this subject.
I think that due diligence might require that people contact the charity and let them know how they feel about their privacy being violated. About how their giving was personal, and that they expected that the AFP Donor Bill Of Rights would be protected and that the charity would not be made a party to an extortion and takeover attempt. Ask them if there is a problem with a donation from Chris. See what their reaction is. And then criticize other fund raisers, as if you have some clue how we think and what we do.
I think that it is high time that someone looked after the charity here.
Maybe then Alec would understand why a guy who does charity work for a living would not be a party to the misuse, abuse and misdirection of the charitable intent of those who desired to help those kids.
You can all say what you want.... but this was bad business, bad karma, and not the way that you do things. Especially if you think that you are right.
None of the forums are any better because of this embarrassing and childish abuse of all that good intent.
If a crime was committed, call the police.
If you have something to say to me, say it to my face.
To do otherwise is to prove what a weak puzzy that you are.
I like the other site. It has less azzholes and internet bullies with agendas. If that means that I am guilty of trying to rip off a charity too... call the police.
Your standard that says that any fund raiser who enjoys some other forum owned by a guy who didn't actually rip off anybody and is in favored status by the charity in question is laughable. My industry laughs at you.
Leave me out of it.
What keeps me in is past agendas. Pure and simple.
"until there is proof that 2650 is the total collected"
Oh... so now it's guilty until someone proves themself innocent to Alec? Who the phuck do you think you are?
Alec should talk to the charity and ask about the inquiry regarding all these individual donors. Ask how they feel about his campaign, the related components of a takeover attempt, and whether they think it is appropriate donor to donor relations.
In fact, if I were the director and the doctor... would want to hear from everyone on this subject.
I think that due diligence might require that people contact the charity and let them know how they feel about their privacy being violated. About how their giving was personal, and that they expected that the AFP Donor Bill Of Rights would be protected and that the charity would not be made a party to an extortion and takeover attempt. Ask them if there is a problem with a donation from Chris. See what their reaction is. And then criticize other fund raisers, as if you have some clue how we think and what we do.
I think that it is high time that someone looked after the charity here.
Maybe then Alec would understand why a guy who does charity work for a living would not be a party to the misuse, abuse and misdirection of the charitable intent of those who desired to help those kids.
You can all say what you want.... but this was bad business, bad karma, and not the way that you do things. Especially if you think that you are right.
None of the forums are any better because of this embarrassing and childish abuse of all that good intent.
If a crime was committed, call the police.
If you have something to say to me, say it to my face.
To do otherwise is to prove what a weak puzzy that you are.
I like the other site. It has less azzholes and internet bullies with agendas. If that means that I am guilty of trying to rip off a charity too... call the police.
Your standard that says that any fund raiser who enjoys some other forum owned by a guy who didn't actually rip off anybody and is in favored status by the charity in question is laughable. My industry laughs at you.
Leave me out of it.
What keeps me in is past agendas. Pure and simple.
