trs vs bravo
06-09-2010, 11:02 AM
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
trs vs bravo
in a 38 topgun does a trs make for a better ride in rough water because the engines are more forward in the boats than a bravo have 625hp per motor is one way better than the other these are my two options?
06-09-2010, 01:17 PM
#2
Gold Member
Gold Member
I have bravos behind about 575-600HP in my Cafe, but I treat them like they are made of glass.
06-09-2010, 01:24 PM
#3
Registered
trs's also shift nice & smooth, no clunk when going in gear like in a bravo. i think the trs was designed for more power than a bravo so may hold up better. i would love to slap on some konrad's on mine but not in the cards yet.
06-09-2010, 01:40 PM
#4
TRS Good for 550 - 600 HP. Konrad is an option. Can pick up spare TRS Drives sometimes on the cheap. Only draw back is the replacement gears used today are made over seas and not nearly as strong as the original OEM merc part. Better Shifiting then Bravo Style Drive, Also makes the ride better on the Top Gun with the weight of the drive plus tranny.
Straight Bottom Guns with 500 HP + tend to be Bravo eaters. Depends on the driver.
I ran TRS on 675HP Mistress (Similar Bottom) for 90 Hours without a problem. At 90 hours I think I had some case flex and the pinion gear went. I then converted to Konrads, and that was a great option. I then sold the boat.
I now have 3a's on the Top Gun
Straight Bottom Guns with 500 HP + tend to be Bravo eaters. Depends on the driver.
I ran TRS on 675HP Mistress (Similar Bottom) for 90 Hours without a problem. At 90 hours I think I had some case flex and the pinion gear went. I then converted to Konrads, and that was a great option. I then sold the boat.
I now have 3a's on the Top Gun
06-09-2010, 02:22 PM
#5
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Posts: 13,706
Received 3,020 Likes
on
987 Posts
I have a better idea...1995 top gun with warmed 525SC's on 3A's. Come and get it!
But to answer your question, the CG on top guns were designed for a transmission and the motors to be further forward. When Cig started pitting bravo's in they did not change the CG meaning the bravo boats have a tendancy to porpoise. An the weight of a gun = bravo eater of you're not careful.
TRS was a great drive but people are scared off becausethey haven't been made in 10 years and there's a fear of replacement parts being scarce, though I haven't seen that to be fact.
Good luck on a purchase.
But to answer your question, the CG on top guns were designed for a transmission and the motors to be further forward. When Cig started pitting bravo's in they did not change the CG meaning the bravo boats have a tendancy to porpoise. An the weight of a gun = bravo eater of you're not careful.
TRS was a great drive but people are scared off becausethey haven't been made in 10 years and there's a fear of replacement parts being scarce, though I haven't seen that to be fact.
Good luck on a purchase.
06-09-2010, 04:00 PM
#6
Registered
I don't have a lot of personal experience with Guns, but I really like my TRS. Has been bulletproof for me with 550-600 HP. Not to mention how smooth they shift.
06-09-2010, 05:26 PM
#8
Registered
iTrader: (1)
If you don't want outdrive problems go with the TRS.
I have had many many TRS boats including a 38 Top Gun & a few Cafes & Mistresses & have NEVER EVER had a drive problem.
I had 1 Bravo 38 Cig T/S boat & had nothing but drive problems for 3 years. Granted I am hard on a boat, but everyone who owned my F-2 Cig had the same story.
In my opinion Bravos belong on houseboats, not on heavy high performance boats.
Oh & my F-2 Cigarette only weighed about 8,500 lbs.
I have had many many TRS boats including a 38 Top Gun & a few Cafes & Mistresses & have NEVER EVER had a drive problem.
I had 1 Bravo 38 Cig T/S boat & had nothing but drive problems for 3 years. Granted I am hard on a boat, but everyone who owned my F-2 Cig had the same story.
In my opinion Bravos belong on houseboats, not on heavy high performance boats.
Oh & my F-2 Cigarette only weighed about 8,500 lbs.
06-09-2010, 07:01 PM
#9
Registered
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH / Pewaukee, WI
Posts: 5,870
Received 365 Likes
on
209 Posts
If you don't want outdrive problems go with the TRS.
I have had many many TRS boats including a 38 Top Gun & a few Cafes & Mistresses & have NEVER EVER had a drive problem.
I had 1 Bravo 38 Cig T/S boat & had nothing but drive problems for 3 years. Granted I am hard on a boat, but everyone who owned my F-2 Cig had the same story.
In my opinion Bravos belong on houseboats, not on heavy high performance boats.
Oh & my F-2 Cigarette only weighed about 8,500 lbs.
I have had many many TRS boats including a 38 Top Gun & a few Cafes & Mistresses & have NEVER EVER had a drive problem.
I had 1 Bravo 38 Cig T/S boat & had nothing but drive problems for 3 years. Granted I am hard on a boat, but everyone who owned my F-2 Cig had the same story.
In my opinion Bravos belong on houseboats, not on heavy high performance boats.
Oh & my F-2 Cigarette only weighed about 8,500 lbs.
Jr.
06-09-2010, 07:42 PM
#10
Registered
iTrader: (2)
I dont understand, if TRS drives are so good, why does everybody want Bravo boats? As far as a nice riding boat goes, I agree with the weight transfer/porpus theory. Makes perfect sense. But I would rather deal with the " bang" into gear and be on the faster Cigarette boat! Jus my 2 cents.
