Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Do It Yourself, Boating on a Budget (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/do-yourself-boating-budget-249/)
-   -   454 with 177 blower build (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/do-yourself-boating-budget/322794-454-177-blower-build.html)

ealesh33 03-16-2015 11:22 AM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4279268)
Both had dyno headers .

Both made great power IMO. I'd like to see what they would have done with a 8-71 and 6psi at 6000rpm. My guess would be WELL into the 700's and prob a lot more resistant to detonation from hot air . :)

I can tell ya a 250 blower driven at 60% over netted 160* intake temps. At a little over 100% over, intake temps soared to 230*. I can only imagine what a 177 spinning 145% overdriven is making for heat . there's a reason those blowers were made for 4k rpm tow truck engines. A stock 525sc Spun that blower at 11k rpm. I personally wouldn't try adding another 3k rpm of rotor speed without an intercooler or at least some IAT gauges.

I think both builds the blower is above the rpm range that is ideal, but I also knew going into the build with doing what we were doing was going to push the blower regardless. My goal was to be as close to 5psi as possible, and my original thought was I wasn't going to use the smaller pulley but for dyno comparison. However with my stock pulley making 3.5psi it pushed me in the direction of the smaller pulley. My target was 650hp on 5psi, which we overshot really. If I wanted to I could take my stock pulley and have it cut down to 3.125" and probably make 4.5psi, but I may not go through the effort, unless we see a reason to, and I would probably try and find another stock pulley to do that too. These are also pleasure boats, the blower will see 99% of its time way under max rpm.

Black Baja 03-16-2015 11:22 AM


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL (Post 4279328)
You would like me to answer the question if I had ever tested the 177 to failure. No I have not. I don`t know anyone with that much $$ to do so either so thats not much of a question.
The manufacturer says the MAX RPM is 15, 000. The rest is just common knowledge. I know hot air rises and electricity follows the path of least resistance but no I haven never tested it personally.
Like I said you know best, you don`t take advice . You left a bunch of power on the table because you said 305 was too big, you proved it wasn`t.
I was just trying to give you some advice because I saw those AFR numbers along with the speed of the blower and timing on the dyno which were alarming.
Obviously you know best and you trust your builder. End of story, end of discussion

You missed the part where he re-used his old bottom end and couldn't use the rectangle series to get the combustion chamber small enough to get the compression up in the motor. You are also harping on a build that has a used bottom end (how used is the question?). Even if both motors went on the same dyno with the same headers on the same day with the same guy running the dyno you still have one fresh motor and one not so fresh motor. At that point the argument becomes a complete waist of time. With a new finish on the cylinders and fresh set of rings I'm sure the results would not have been the same.

ealesh33 03-16-2015 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL (Post 4279328)
You would like me to answer the question if I had ever tested the 177 to failure. No I have not. I don`t know anyone with that much $$ to do so either so thats not much of a question.
The manufacturer says the MAX RPM is 15, 000. The rest is just common knowledge. I know hot air rises and electricity follows the path of least resistance but no I haven never tested it personally.
Like I said you know best, you don`t take advice . You left a bunch of power on the table because you said 305 was too big, you proved it wasn`t.
I was just trying to give you some advice because I saw those AFR numbers along with the speed of the blower and timing on the dyno which were alarming.
Obviously you know best and you trust your builder. End of story, end of discussion

You keep saying I know best and I don't take advice lol. I don't know best, and I do take advice, just cause I am not jumping on board with your advice doesn't mean i don't take advice.

And see I look at this different then you, as you keep going back to this 305 vs 265 competition bs. It's not a competition, but you know what s great data, that the smallest and cheapest head AFR makes, this tiny peanut port head, out of the box made almost 700hp on a cruiser motor with a small huffer. That's great information to a lot of people. I don't care what the 305 made, and I don't see where I left a lot of power on the table. Also like has been stated before the 305 was never an option for me as the combustion chamber was too large to a achieve the target compression, but that fact has and was skimmed over by you so you could continue on down this path that you are staying on. I think both builds are great builds and made surprising power.


Can you post your source for the max rpm information of 15,000rpm? And if that's true then we fall under that, and I know of people spinning them higher then I will be with success.

My timing and blower speed is alarming lol? Mike ran 36 degrees of timing on his build at just under 13000rpms on the blower, why would my timing be alarming over his? You think the amount of heat I'm generating spinning the blower 1700 more rpms with 2 degrees less timing makes it alarming over mikes setup? What is driving you to this conclusion?

ealesh33 03-16-2015 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by Black Baja (Post 4279341)
You missed the part where he re-used his old bottom end and couldn't use the rectangle series to get the combustion chamber small enough to get the compression up in the motor. You are also harping on a build that has a used bottom end (how used is the question?). Even if both motors went on the same dyno with the same headers on the same day with the same guy running the dyno you still have one fresh motor and one not so fresh motor. At that point the argument becomes a complete waist of time. With a new finish on the cylinders and fresh set of rings I'm sure the results would not have been the same.

Bottom end has 150-200hrs, and it was looked through to gauge condition. Nothing was seen to indicate any issues, bearings and all appeared to be in good shape. Trust me my builder would have liked to rebuild the bottom if he saw something that made it necessary to him.

ICDEDPPL 03-16-2015 12:01 PM

I see now we`re bringing the bottom end into this discussion. ok
Instead of coming up with excuses I`d like to see one shred of evidence that the 305 head is " too big" .
There was a 100 page thread that is was but the fast is it isn`t. *please see dyno sheets*
That`s proof, not excuses about bottom ends or dyno headers etc etc

offshorexcursion 03-16-2015 12:03 PM

Just for fun how much HP and torque did your engines make MT?

I was pretty impressed when I seen and heard your boat run in person!

ealesh33 03-16-2015 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL (Post 4279358)
I see now we`re bringing the bottom end into this discussion. ok
Instead of coming up with excuses I`d like to see one shred of evidence that the 305 head is " too big" .
There was a 100 page thread that is was but the fast is it isn`t. *please see dyno sheets*
That`s proof, not excuses about bottom ends or dyno headers etc etc

How am I making excuses lol, and for what reason would I need to make an excuse? You are just grasping at everything here. I never brought up my bottom end, I amswered a kind of question by Black Baja. I also never said the 265 would make more power, I actualy said in the other thread I thiught the 305 would probably make more, which it did, but it was a lot closer then I thought it would be. What should be taken away from this is that a 454, 461, or 468 can make great power with a 265 AFR head.

Black Baja 03-16-2015 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL (Post 4279358)
I see now we`re bringing the bottom end into this discussion. ok
Instead of coming up with excuses I`d like to see one shred of evidence that the 305 head is " too big" .
There was a 100 page thread that is was but the fast is it isn`t. *please see dyno sheets*
That`s proof, not excuses about bottom ends or dyno headers etc etc

If you have two identical motors. One reminds you of a steam locomotive (out of the valve cover breathers) that's obviously worn out to the point you have to clean the Bildge every weekend. And the other looks like a normal motor (nothing out of the breathers). Which motor makes more horsepower?

MILD THUNDER 03-16-2015 12:46 PM


Originally Posted by offshorexcursion (Post 4279360)
Just for fun how much HP and torque did your engines make MT?

I was pretty impressed when I seen and heard your boat run in person!

Thanks buddy.

804hp @ 6200 rpm , 736ft lbs peak torque. 6.5lbs of boost.

MILD THUNDER 03-16-2015 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by ealesh33 (Post 4279379)
How am I making excuses lol, and for what reason would I need to make an excuse? You are just grasping at everything here. I never brought up my bottom end, I amswered a kind of question by Black Baja. I also never said the 265 would make more power, I actualy said in the other thread I thiught the 305 would probably make more, which it did, but it was a lot closer then I thought it would be. What should be taken away from this is that a 454, 461, or 468 can make great power with a 265 AFR head.

A 454 with a supercharger making 675hp, is like a 540 with a supercharger making 799hp at 1.48hp per ci.

Today 900-1000hp all day with a hot blown 540 marine engine.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.