![]() |
Originally Posted by JaniH
(Post 4679451)
Got my stainles marine exhaust. Em i right that these are 3" taller version risers, looks longer also. Just wondering how much overlap these can take.
|
Originally Posted by Zone 5
(Post 4680800)
For 500 HP you do not need some one off cam. And the cam he is suggesting is going to totally mess up the airflow in the intake. There is a reason he is on all the car sites and not this one. Don't you think that if that worked, that Comp, etc etc would be doing it?
I hate to make it simpler than it is, but as Phragle said, making 500 HP from a 454 is really basic engine building. GM was doing it in the 1960's I know your hatred for straub runs so deep, it brings you out of the shadows to comment , but can you at least slander him with some factual information that may be of help to the original poster ? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Zone 5
(Post 4680802)
You only need 112 or higher to make 500 HP, and these will be fine. Just make sure they drop to the transom, and don't flatten out. Yes, they are higher ones than "stock". without a ruler, they "look" like 3 inches in the picture
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4680807)
Comp cams and others actually have been doing that. Its not just for power, it helps the unbalanced air/fuel distribution that carbureted big blocks are known for. Just like firing order swaps can help even out cylinder to cylinder distribution. Not "mess up airflow in the intake" as you say.
I know your hatred for straub runs so deep, it brings you out of the shadows to comment , but can you at least slander him with some factual information that may be of help to the original poster ? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4680809)
Overlap isnt defined by "112" . its a result of timing events. In other words, duration, intake centerline, exhaust centerline, determine what the overlap will be, and when it will be. A 112LSA cam with 5* of advance built in, wont have the same overlap effect as a 112LSA cam with 2* of advance built in.
|
Nice to have new blood to the discussion. What is the safe zone for gm nodular cast crank?
|
Originally Posted by JaniH
(Post 4680834)
Nice to have new blood to the discussion. What is the safe zone for gm nodular cast crank?
|
550hp/5800rpm, thats enough for sure. Going to balance rods to +/- 1g both ends, pistons +/-1g. My pistons and rods aint the lightest ones. Pistons are forged speed pro l2349f. Rods are eagles I-beam with 7/16 bolts. Pistons will loose some weight because i have to shave some material from the domes, to get the compression ratio to 9.5 to 1. What is the max compression with iron heads, offcourse it depens on about the camshaft but approx? Without shaving the pistons i am at 10 to 1
|
Originally Posted by JaniH
(Post 4680863)
550hp/5800rpm, thats enough for sure. Going to balance rods to +/- 1g both ends, pistons +/-1g. My pistons and rods aint the lightest ones. Pistons are forged speed pro l2349f. Rods are eagles I-beam with 7/16 bolts. Pistons will loose some weight because i have to shave some material from the domes, to get the compression ratio to 9.5 to 1. What is the max compression with iron heads, offcourse it depens on about the camshaft but approx? Without shaving the pistons i am at 10 to 1
|
Originally Posted by Zone 5
(Post 4680969)
Depends on the gas you have available. I ran 9.5 with 93 (and 91) octane with zero issues. Beyond that I would go on the side of caution. more CR will get you "easy" HP, within reason, but it won't help if you detonate and break stuff.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.