Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
IMCO SCX failures ?? >

IMCO SCX failures ??

Notices

IMCO SCX failures ??

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-29-2009 | 05:45 PM
  #1  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default IMCO SCX failures ??

I am thinking about trading in my IMCO SC upper for an SCX upper in anticipation of an upgrade in power to about 875 horsepower in my 28' Nordic Heat.

Does anyone have any experience or has had or seen proplems with an SCX?

Thanks in advance,

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 4
From: cedar springs mi
Default

I would like to know that same thing.
dennis r is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Default

The only "problem" Ive heard really isnt and its from the LaveyCraft guys is that it takes a LOT of power to turn that drive.




UD
Uncle Dave is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 07:40 PM
  #4  
NWPC's Avatar
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 6
From: Entiat, Washington
Default

Replaced my Teaque with an SCX. No problems and no loss of RPMS or speed.
NWPC is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 07:50 PM
  #5  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Dave
The only "problem" Ive heard really isnt and its from the LaveyCraft guys is that it takes a LOT of power to turn that drive.




UD
Dave,

I have heard quite the opposite. Of the two guys I know that have switched from XR drives, one had the same rpm and speed, and the other was 1 mph faster. I think this might be because of the additional weight of the upper, reducing his prop slip by some margin by pushing the prop a little lower in the water.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 08:15 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by CB-BLR
Dave,

I have heard quite the opposite. Of the two guys I know that have switched from XR drives, one had the same rpm and speed, and the other was 1 mph faster. I think this might be because of the additional weight of the upper, reducing his prop slip by some margin by pushing the prop a little lower in the water.

Chris
Interesting, I wonder if anyones dyno spun it?

At this point Im living vicariously through you and your mods!

Im hoping you do it, I may be next depending on what Kap find out about the Xpower. Although I suspect that moves the failure point from breaking drives to breaking transom assemblies.

LOVE to see some one as thorough as you test this.

Dave
Uncle Dave is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 08:50 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 988
Likes: 2
From: San Diego
Default

The thing that I have heard is, the hot ticket seems to be the SCX upper, with the SC lower. Note I have no personal experience with either.


Darrell.
DMOORE is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Watkins Glen
Default

[QUOTE=DMOORE;2963216]The thing that I have heard is, the hot ticket seems to be the SCX upper, with the SC lower. Note I have no personal experience with either.


I have heard the same, the SC lower is faster. I also am going to need a change and have been looking at the SCX upper I will need it in a -3 style for my -3 lower.
DonRoc is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

[QUOTE=DonRoc;2963238]
Originally Posted by DMOORE
The thing that I have heard is, the hot ticket seems to be the SCX upper, with the SC lower. Note I have no personal experience with either.


I have heard the same, the SC lower is faster. I also am going to need a change and have been looking at the SCX upper I will need it in a -3 style for my -3 lower.

The SCX upper will not mate to a -3 lower. The upper case is a one piece unit.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2009 | 10:34 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Watkins Glen
Default

[QUOTE=CB-BLR;2963252]
Originally Posted by DonRoc


The SCX upper will not mate to a -3 lower. The upper case is a one piece unit.

Chris

I know its one piece. Are you saying they do not make a upper to go with there -3 lower? Like the SC extreme they make an upper to mate to there -3 lower. I will have to call them in the morning.
Thanks

Don
DonRoc is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.