Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Why Not Run Bravo as Surface Drive? >

Why Not Run Bravo as Surface Drive?

Notices

Why Not Run Bravo as Surface Drive?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-16-2012 | 11:46 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default Why Not Run Bravo as Surface Drive?

I see outboard and even tunnel boat I/O people raise the X-dimension so high, they are essential running their drives as surface drives for extra top end speed. They couple this with a Speedmaster type lower to lower drag and give the prop better flow. I rarely see that done for offshore, though. Anyone have any idea why not?

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-2012 | 01:39 AM
  #2  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,232
Likes: 2,482
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

The Bravo was never designed to be a surface drive. It can't handle coming out the water constantly. Also, props built for Bravos are not built to be surface piercing. Prop slip goes up, the blades crack and often break off.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-2012 | 06:31 AM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
The Bravo was never designed to be a surface drive. It can't handle coming out the water constantly. Also, props built for Bravos are not built to be surface piercing. Prop slip goes up, the blades crack and often break off.
"I saw it on the Internet, I'm pretty sure I can do it".

That's a pretty convincing argument you put out there Griff.
242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-2012 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
The Bravo was never designed to be a surface drive. It can't handle coming out the water constantly. Also, props built for Bravos are not built to be surface piercing. Prop slip goes up, the blades crack and often break off.
Are the higher hp Mercury outboards are designed to run in a surface piercing state? It seems like it is done a lot.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 01:45 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 1
From: Delaware
Default

What Griff said is correct about the Bravo style drives. My prop is surface piercing and so far I have thrown blades on three different props in three seasons.
Philm is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Philm
What Griff said is correct about the Bravo style drives. My prop is surface piercing and so far I have thrown blades on three different props in three seasons.
Wow - scary. Any damage? Were they all stock props or modified/lab'd?

Do you have a shorter X-dim or do you just launch off waves as much as possible?
242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Default

There is also the hamonic impact on the gears. The vibrations created when the drive is surfacing travels through the gears as well. On all acounts, it's hard for both prop and drive. When it comes to outboards, the power is often substancially less than on boats running surfaced Bravos. Which kind of prop also plays a factor. When you see outboards running completely surfaced, they run either Cleavers, Choppers ect. that are build for it. When all is said and done, outboards also has their problems with making the lowers last in larger surface installations. Just ask the guys running twins to quads on 25-35 foot cats.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 12:22 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

I just got an email from a guy who is running his Imco SC (XR equivalent) with the prop shaft 2" below the hull line on his 21' Daytona, using a Bravo 1 prop. He has a friend who is 1/2" below hull line, with the same prop. Both report no problems so far. I keep wondering how they are getting away with this. One is running 670 hp at over 119, and the other almost 800 at over 130. They do run in calm water, and, of course, the boats are light, comparatively speaking to your typical offshore V-hull.

Michael

Last edited by Michael1; 03-18-2012 at 12:27 PM.
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 01:13 PM
  #9  
bor's Avatar
bor
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
Likes: 4
From: uithoorn,the netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
I just got an email from a guy who is running his Imco SC (XR equivalent) with the prop shaft 2" below the hull line on his 21' Daytona, using a Bravo 1 prop. He has a friend who is 1/2" below hull line, with the same prop. Both report no problems so far. I keep wondering how they are getting away with this. One is running 670 hp at over 119, and the other almost 800 at over 130. They do run in calm water, and, of course, the boats are light, comparatively speaking to your typical offshore V-hull.

Michael
I gonna try this in a few months whit 560hp in front of it




Prop shaft is above the bottom it works very well on the classic donzi's
bor is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2012 | 01:27 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: mirabel,qc
Default

with 560hp,you'll still have to be ''polite'' ,as those were designed for 400-450hp max...good luck
pqjack is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.