Why Not Run Bravo as Surface Drive?
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
I see outboard and even tunnel boat I/O people raise the X-dimension so high, they are essential running their drives as surface drives for extra top end speed. They couple this with a Speedmaster type lower to lower drag and give the prop better flow. I rarely see that done for offshore, though. Anyone have any idea why not?
Michael
Michael
#2
The Bravo was never designed to be a surface drive. It can't handle coming out the water constantly. Also, props built for Bravos are not built to be surface piercing. Prop slip goes up, the blades crack and often break off.
#3
Registered

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI

That's a pretty convincing argument you put out there Griff.

#4
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Michael
#6
Registered

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI
Do you have a shorter X-dim or do you just launch off waves as much as possible?
#7
Registered
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
There is also the hamonic impact on the gears. The vibrations created when the drive is surfacing travels through the gears as well. On all acounts, it's hard for both prop and drive. When it comes to outboards, the power is often substancially less than on boats running surfaced Bravos. Which kind of prop also plays a factor. When you see outboards running completely surfaced, they run either Cleavers, Choppers ect. that are build for it. When all is said and done, outboards also has their problems with making the lowers last in larger surface installations. Just ask the guys running twins to quads on 25-35 foot cats.
#8
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
I just got an email from a guy who is running his Imco SC (XR equivalent) with the prop shaft 2" below the hull line on his 21' Daytona, using a Bravo 1 prop. He has a friend who is 1/2" below hull line, with the same prop. Both report no problems so far. I keep wondering how they are getting away with this. One is running 670 hp at over 119, and the other almost 800 at over 130. They do run in calm water, and, of course, the boats are light, comparatively speaking to your typical offshore V-hull.
Michael
Michael
Last edited by Michael1; 03-18-2012 at 12:27 PM.
#9
I just got an email from a guy who is running his Imco SC (XR equivalent) with the prop shaft 2" below the hull line on his 21' Daytona, using a Bravo 1 prop. He has a friend who is 1/2" below hull line, with the same prop. Both report no problems so far. I keep wondering how they are getting away with this. One is running 670 hp at over 119, and the other almost 800 at over 130. They do run in calm water, and, of course, the boats are light, comparatively speaking to your typical offshore V-hull.
Michael
Michael


Prop shaft is above the bottom it works very well on the classic donzi's



