Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Arneson on a 20 Cig? >

Arneson on a 20 Cig?

Notices

Arneson on a 20 Cig?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-15-2012 | 09:57 AM
  #11  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by plaster dave
I hope you have a lot of money and time for testing and tuning. This project will take it all and then some.
Yea it could turn out like that Daytona that went 23 mph slower with the IMCO on it than it did with the Arneson. Everyone made statements like yours b/c they knew it all
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 06:10 PM
  #12  
DonziChick's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Faster - I'm guessing your referring to the 22' Blackhawks, not a 32.

Off topic but I've ridden in a couple of Blackhawk boats and they scare the crap out of me. Granted the first one I was in the guy had just bought, was trying to learn how to drive it and we were dodging logs all through Lake Cumberland
DonziChick is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 06:21 PM
  #13  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,314
Likes: 1,556
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by FasterFaster
A successful hull with any fully surfacing drive will need natural rocker in the bottom. Otherwise, the thrust line is too high. That makes the boat roll up toward its nose and bow steer. Unfortunately, a 20 Cig bottom is very straight and true. Not good for a surfacing drive - unless you are able to lower with spacers (not possible on an Arneson).

Rocker's why a Donzi 32 ran great with Blackhawks. My old Scarab with a single Blackhawk was almost impossible drive at speed due to bow steer. It was +- 30 degrees of heading every time it landed after a launch - because the nose did the steering. Same was true of the few they built with KAAMAs back in the 1980's.

Furthermore, as a single, your Cig will tend to torque roll opposite the direction of prop rotation. (At least Blackhawk, with counter rotating props, didn't have that problem.) You would need constant tab to offset. At the power you're talking about, your easiest and cheapest solution to your drive dilemma is to leave the Arneson on the floor and buy a Bravo XR. Drive trim is your friend. My 2
cents.
huh? every person that has put a blackhawk on a cig 20 has picked up speed and driveability. I have one for my 20 cig. Cig 20's have plenty of rocker built into them. Tony, go by Daves shop, he is finishing up mine as we speak.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-2012 | 09:28 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 1
From: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Default fixx

Originally Posted by FasterFaster
A successful hull with any fully surfacing drive will need natural rocker in the bottom. Otherwise, the thrust line is too high. That makes the boat roll up toward its nose and bow steer. Unfortunately, a 20 Cig bottom is very straight and true. Not good for a surfacing drive - unless you are able to lower with spacers (not possible on an Arneson).

Rocker's why a Donzi 32 ran great with Blackhawks. My old Scarab with a single Blackhawk was almost impossible drive at speed due to bow steer. It was +- 30 degrees of heading every time it landed after a launch - because the nose did the steering. Same was true of the few they built with KAAMAs back in the 1980's.

Furthermore, as a single, your Cig will tend to torque roll opposite the direction of prop rotation. (At least Blackhawk, with counter rotating props, didn't have that problem.) You would need constant tab to offset. At the power you're talking about, your easiest and cheapest solution to your drive dilemma is to leave the Arneson on the floor and buy a Bravo XR. Drive trim is your friend. My 2
cents.
you mean rocker hulls rite?
FIXX is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2012 | 07:42 AM
  #15  
Airpacker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 3
From: Aurora Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
huh? every person that has put a blackhawk on a cig 20 has picked up speed and driveability. I have one for my 20 cig. Cig 20's have plenty of rocker built into them. Tony, go by Daves shop, he is finishing up mine as we speak.
Come on Rob, we all know black hawks don't work













I wish I could still run mine. Too bad there isn't an SCX version
Airpacker is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2012 | 01:56 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
huh? every person that has put a blackhawk on a cig 20 has picked up speed and driveability. I have one for my 20 cig. Cig 20's have plenty of rocker built into them. Tony, go by Daves shop, he is finishing up mine as we speak.
The one I measured was flat. Maybe its bottom was worked over. If the boat in question has rocker, like you describe, then the Arneson may work. (That was the original question.) Still will be expensive, though. Prop alone will cost close to what a Bravo does.
FasterFaster is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2012 | 05:56 AM
  #17  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,314
Likes: 1,556
From: Maryland
Default

Some of the newer 20's built do have a pad bottom, but have still responded well to the Blackhawk, the round keel ones will respond even better.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.