Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Drive discussion: trs.  3's. And 5's >

Drive discussion: trs. 3's. And 5's

Notices

Drive discussion: trs. 3's. And 5's

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-07-2015 | 07:23 AM
  #101  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

BAJA!!! (24 Outlaw, Hammer)
there's one... have to remove the seat to get at front of a BBC... never in a million years would you get a transmission in it

this is a serious forum guys... lets be fair to those who don't have experience...

as for the #4,#5 story... rigging and X dimension are a huge factor in performance...
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 07:25 AM
  #102  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

and If I understand what Fullforce is trying to say here is that a bravo boat will have a little more wiggle room in the cockpit and he is correct in that assumption
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 07:36 AM
  #103  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Jeff32... crashboxes are for a serious (RACING) application they are a pain in the azz when it comes to docking a boat... similar to comparing a monkey trying to phuck a football!!! as for SSM drives there isn't a more cost effective way to deliver big power to the liquid, the alternative would be Imco SCX which is huge $$$ in comparison to lets say a #3 drive even when you factor the rerig and transmission into the equation...
and again with regards to performance, prop selection and X dimension are huge factors... my 43 Scarab with 1100s and #3As planes like a ski boat with 16.75 x 32 4 blade cleavers... so go figure!! and my drives are high!! for a #3 config.. 2.5" below bottom... when I do the rerig my #5s will be on a box and 1" up from the bottom which will allow sufficient options of running a spacer for daily pleasure boating or no spacer for when poker/race running when top speed is all I care about!!
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 08:38 AM
  #104  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,425
Likes: 3,953
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

I've read most of this thread and my head hurts, with the 4's & 5's being some 5" shorter than the 3's is there difficulty getting the boat to nose over, getting up on plane when compairing a #3 to a #5 on the same boat say a 38 TG
F-2 Speedy is online now  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 08:53 AM
  #105  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by 33outlawsst
I've read most of this thread and my head hurts, with the 4's & 5's being some 5" shorter than the 3's is there difficulty getting the boat to nose over, getting up on plane when compairing a #3 to a #5 on the same boat say a 38 TG
5 13/16" shorter
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 08:56 AM
  #106  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

ask Rick G how his 38 flat deck planes with his #5s right on the transom (no box)
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 08:59 AM
  #107  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

and Outlaw... take an Advil for your headache this is a drive forum lmao
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 09:00 AM
  #108  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
From: Lambertville, MI.
Default

Originally Posted by adk61
Jeff32... crashboxes are for a serious (RACING) application they are a pain in the azz when it comes to docking a boat... similar to comparing a monkey trying to phuck a football!!! as for SSM drives there isn't a more cost effective way to deliver big power to the liquid, the alternative would be Imco SCX which is huge $$$ in comparison to lets say a #3 drive even when you factor the rerig and transmission into the equation...
and again with regards to performance, prop selection and X dimension are huge factors... my 43 Scarab with 1100s and #3As planes like a ski boat with 16.75 x 32 4 blade cleavers... so go figure!! and my drives are high!! for a #3 config.. 2.5" below bottom... when I do the rerig my #5s will be on a box and 1" up from the bottom which will allow sufficient options of running a spacer for daily pleasure boating or no spacer for when poker/race running when top speed is all I care about!!
I ran spacers on my 5s and it still was a turd out of the hole...just had to Rev it and she got it. I'm just saying for most people they are going to have a little learning curve for the most part. I ran 18 x 30 on my 950s and removed spacers it was perfect all around.
Mad Mac is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 09:05 AM
  #109  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Mad Mac
I ran spacers on my 5s and it still was a turd out of the hole...just had to Rev it and she got it. I'm just saying for most people they are going to have a little learning curve for the most part. I ran 18 x 30 on my 950s and removed spacers it was perfect all around.
again... comes down to proper prop selection... its all part of the game...
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2015 | 09:18 AM
  #110  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,425
Likes: 3,953
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Originally Posted by adk61
and Outlaw... take an Advil for your headache this is a drive forum lmao

whats up with this
F-2 Speedy is online now  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.