3a versus no.6s
#11
^^^ agree.
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.

Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.

Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html
#13
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,311
Likes: 1,817
From: Merritt Island, FL
#14
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: southampton uk
Wow, what a great solution, will definitely look in to them.
The reason I asked about the weak point was that I thought of re-fabricating that particular part in a higher grade material. If the top shaft always failed then get it remade in T-Met 25, a higher grade stainless. Not cheap but cheaper than changing drives. I'm guessing that Mercury use a med/high quality so higher would be possible.
Any thoughts? Totally stupid idea?
Thanks
The reason I asked about the weak point was that I thought of re-fabricating that particular part in a higher grade material. If the top shaft always failed then get it remade in T-Met 25, a higher grade stainless. Not cheap but cheaper than changing drives. I'm guessing that Mercury use a med/high quality so higher would be possible.
Any thoughts? Totally stupid idea?
Thanks
Last edited by jonathan49; 12-04-2016 at 09:07 AM.




