fastest single engine Formula hull?
#14
Registered
Yea but he's looking for single engine.
I will say here though that the 292 with the 6.2/Bravo combo in twin is a perfect set up in my opinion. Seriously...70+ MPH from the factory with twin Small Blocks...can't beat that for efficiency.
I will say here though that the 292 with the 6.2/Bravo combo in twin is a perfect set up in my opinion. Seriously...70+ MPH from the factory with twin Small Blocks...can't beat that for efficiency.
#15
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dixie
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the input guys! Looks like the 271/272 is the winner. What year did for Formula release the Fastech series? Ideally would like to find one with a good drive, sound cosmetics, and a bad engine. I've been looking at building a 598ci 750-800hp engine as my dream build. After this project is done, will start collect parts to build a big inch pump gas moster.
Sprink, my buddy has a 04 Donzi 28zx/r? with twin 330hp mpi 5.7s that is just well rounded. Does 69/70 with 2 aboard, 64/65 with 6 and gear, is better on fuel than my single 7.4, planes easily, even does great for tubing. But, he has the speed bug too, and has 2 383ci 560hp engines being dropped in now.. Im sure he will make his 85mph goal, but I think his boat will go from a friendly well balanced ride to a fuel guzzling tempermental speed beast. He's dicthing the fuel injection for carbs also..
Sprink, my buddy has a 04 Donzi 28zx/r? with twin 330hp mpi 5.7s that is just well rounded. Does 69/70 with 2 aboard, 64/65 with 6 and gear, is better on fuel than my single 7.4, planes easily, even does great for tubing. But, he has the speed bug too, and has 2 383ci 560hp engines being dropped in now.. Im sure he will make his 85mph goal, but I think his boat will go from a friendly well balanced ride to a fuel guzzling tempermental speed beast. He's dicthing the fuel injection for carbs also..
#16
Registered
mid 80's 272 Sr1's came with twin sbc's 88-91 had the option of 454/bravo's, 90/91 there were a few made with 454/mags, 92-96 they changed the 27 to a 271 Sr1 with a single, some had 454's most had 502's and some optioned with a bravo 3, 97-04 271's were given the fastech hull and powered with 502's although some had a 500 or 525 in the later years
#17
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dixie
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mid 80's 272 Sr1's came with twin sbc's 88-91 had the option of 454/bravo's, 90/91 there were a few made with 454/mags, 92-96 they changed the 27 to a 271 Sr1 with a single, some had 454's most had 502's and some optioned with a bravo 3, 97-04 271's were given the fastech hull and powered with 502's although some had a 500 or 525 in the later years
#18
Registered
iTrader: (1)
My Dad's 1978 20CL isn't designed to be the fastest, but it can sure run good with a lot of power. He still owns it today and it was probably the fastest single engine Formula back in the 1980's. It was the only 20CL built with a big block and TRS outdrive. He had Formula build it with a higher X-dim. We eventually modified the engine and when fresh it ran in the low 70's. She's definitely a sleeper!
The last pic is me driving in 1983 at age 17 on our annual trip to Lake Erie running in Sandusky Bay. She was a handful with a 24 degree deadrise and rounded keel, but handled the speed pretty darn good.
The last pic is me driving in 1983 at age 17 on our annual trip to Lake Erie running in Sandusky Bay. She was a handful with a 24 degree deadrise and rounded keel, but handled the speed pretty darn good.
#19
Registered
Wow! Had no idea there was so many engine choices.I've always heard that a short (27-29ft) boat with twin big blocks tend to be 'ass heavy' and planing/slow speeds tend to be a pain. And a nightmare to wrench on bc of limited access. True? false? Sounds like a 97up single engine may be what I'm looking for as my next 'bird..
#20
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Dixie
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm,lots to consider... Good thing theres plenty of time to research and come up with a good gameplan. I think when the time comes, a single engine will be my choice, mainly due to the $$$ it will take to build what I want. Its funny how you can be knee deep in one project, yet the minds' gear are working on the next.