Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ?? >

Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ??

Notices
Formula

Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ??

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-30-2016 | 02:00 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Likes: 3
From: Oslo
Default Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ??

I find it a litle strange that there are no room for a single engine boat in the Fastech line ...

With all the new engine options out there from Merc Racing, Ilmore etc even the " new " Merc 502 430 Hk gives a
Great all round performance and allmost 65 mph top speed.
A perfect combo should be the new Merc Racing 520, which should take the boat into the low 70 s

That s the same speed as 292 with 6,2 s and the 353 with 430 s

I find the design realy cool, classic and timless, and find 8,3 beam and a length of 27,1 feet symmetric.
Only thing they need to do is find a place to a refrigerator and maybe some more room to put stuf ;-)

The ride should be good in fjords, lakes, rivers and even at the coast, if the wind is not to strong.

In today's economic situation, and quite high cost for fuel and mentaince, it maybe a good option ......

So what do you Formula guys think about the idea, that Formula relance the 271 Fastech ??
Attached Thumbnails Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ??-image.jpeg   Time to relancerelance the 271 Fastech ??-image.jpg  

Last edited by Monaco20; 01-30-2016 at 02:06 PM.
Monaco20 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2016 | 02:04 PM
  #2  
DRAG's Avatar
Platinum Member
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 482
Likes: 400
From: Danville, IN
Default

It would knock a lot of cost down for people that want to get into a Formula. I think that is a popular size for a lake boat. A lot of times I think people buying boats that size are getting these big runabouts, wakeboard boats, etc. Go fast buyers are all dreaming of bigger boats.
DRAG is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2016 | 02:12 PM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 7
From: new england
Default

They simply cost too much to make, and can not be sold for a high enough mark up to sustain the product. To make it a profitable boat formula would have to cut the quality and mass produce it. Remember the Falcon line??? Affordable formulas...
twin242ls is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2016 | 02:27 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Likes: 3
From: Oslo
Default

So I heard do you know the price difference between 292 and 271 I think 2010 was the last year of the 271, not sure ....

I do not understand that it's impossible to produce 271,as a luxury single performance boat at an acceptable
Price. For sure it will not be cheap, but no Formulas are cheap....
Monaco20 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-01-2016 | 06:59 AM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 7
From: new england
Default

Not 100% sure the cost difference, But a base 292 vs a loaded 271 looks like about 25-30k. The 292 phased put the 271 and the 312.
twin242ls is offline  
Reply
Old 02-01-2016 | 07:31 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: PA
Default

I just think people aren't buying Fastechs like they once were. I haven't seen a full Fastech line up at a boat show in a LONGGGGGGGG time. The SS models have definitely become more popular. Yes there are those "speed" freaks out there that want nothing more than a go-fast boat, but boating is entertainment for yourself and others. You can entertain on an SS. It' tough to entertain when 4 people on a Fastech is cramped. I'll admit I've looked at trading into an SS from my 292. One because we are starting to overnight at places more and Two I can fit more people.
Splitdecision271 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-01-2016 | 01:18 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

I went from a 271 fastech to a 312 fastech. One thing I hated was the on deck space of the 271 was so small compared to my 312. Cabin space is similar between the two. The 271 was a great first go fast boat, but honestly I wanted twin engines pretty shortly after buying 271.
racinfast002 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2016 | 08:27 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 3
From: Tonawanda NY
Default

I think there is room, but rwally no one else is doing it so why should they, there is no more entry level performance boats, single or twin engine
88242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-2016 | 10:36 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 9
Default

Pricewise the 271 was too close too the 292. Also I think they should have stuck with the 8 foot beam on it.
Mr Maine is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.