Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
Distant Thunder gets new power.. >

Distant Thunder gets new power..

Notices
Formula

Distant Thunder gets new power..

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-18-2016 | 09:12 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by distantthunder
My only concern was the RPM range of 2200-5800 RPM based on maxing out at ~5000 RPM with the 24P Bravo 1. Before BBlades cleaned up the prop, she was turning ~5300 RPM in the low 60's but I assume once the dyno is done and some sea trials, I can dial in the prop more appropriately. I will be using the timing set that is included with the Cam kit. It looks like the CR will be around 9-9.25 when all said and done. The ilde was pretty high before ~800 RPM and I usually have it around 1100 when moving around the docks.The SM manifolds have tails that almost touch the tips on the thru hull (~2.5 Inches), I was thinking of setting the initial ignition timing at 10* but since I will be using the dyno, I will get to play with it a bit.
The rpm ranges advertised aren't that useful. I would think you would make max horsepower at 54-5500, but the dyno will tell for sure. Careful on your max advance and run good fuel.
Mr Maine is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2016 | 09:28 AM
  #12  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 2
From: Central IL / Green Bay, WI
Default

Sorry to go off topic, but I like your fauxtina C-10.

I own a couple 67-72 myself



Wasted Income is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2016 | 10:45 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 460
Likes: 31
Default

Originally Posted by distantthunder
Thanks for the input, I am returning the originally ordered kit and going with the K-01-451-8. Do you have a part number for that HD coupler you speak of?
you will need this flywheel cover pn; 865657A04
here is a used one at the fraction of the cost.(i got mine on ebay for $100)
http://www.shipwrecksalvage.net/merc...04-p-4305.html
and here is the coupler #
8M0098795
oconnor marine is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2016 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 670
Likes: 117
From: Denton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Wasted Income
Sorry to go off topic, but I like your fauxtina C-10.

I own a couple 67-72 myself



I just fell in love with "Clunker"
distantthunder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2016 | 02:12 PM
  #15  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 2
From: Central IL / Green Bay, WI
Default

Originally Posted by distantthunder
I just fell in love with "Clunker"
Lol, thanks. She packs a little punch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHyBb...Lvfath&index=3
Wasted Income is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2016 | 09:56 AM
  #16  
badmonkey's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 568
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Wasted Income
Lol, thanks. She packs a little punch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHyBb...Lvfath&index=3
Share the results...
badmonkey is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2016 | 01:22 PM
  #17  
TomZ's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,457
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Wasted Income
Lol, thanks. She packs a little punch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHyBb...Lvfath&index=3
Going to be starting a similar project with my S10.... race weight of 2800 pounds and is high-10s capable as she sits. Really loving the idea of a cheap 5.3L turbo set-up to go 9's. My understanding is the 5.3L short block is 1200 HP capable.

Back to the thread...
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2016 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
TomZ's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,457
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Josh,

Comp is rather weak in the lift department, and I'm not a fan of their cores. A big block Chevy with decent heads needs lift. I would look at some
crane offerings. The 731 (or equivalent) is a good choice, but requires you to spin it a little faster (5600). Just my thoughts.
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-2016 | 08:28 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 1
From: Maine
Default

I just put a 168761 in my 454 mag. Hoping to dyno soon. I had a comp cam similar to the 168731 that peaked out at 5200 previously.
Mohawk242 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-2016 | 02:09 PM
  #20  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 2
From: Central IL / Green Bay, WI
Default

Originally Posted by badmonkey
Share the results...
823 rwhp, 899 rwtq through a 4L80E and an unlocked converter.

Originally Posted by TomZ
My understanding is the 5.3L short block is 1200 HP capable.
LOL. No. I don't care what Hot Rod magazine says.
Wasted Income is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.