Advice on a 42'
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
From: East Lyme, CT
Thinking about buying this boat...any thoughts (good or bad!).
http://www.teamshogren.com/pre-owned...lightning.html
http://www.teamshogren.com/pre-owned...lightning.html
#2
Registered

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 393
From: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
42 foot boats, 700 HP engines, and bravo type drives don't stay together long. It's been tried over and over and over and the drives dont last. That is why Mercury finally spent big bucks to devolop their NXT drive.
Nice boat, nice engines, just be prepared to buy drives by the gross.
Nice boat, nice engines, just be prepared to buy drives by the gross.
Last edited by Marginmn; 01-29-2009 at 12:04 PM.
#5
Registered

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,325
Likes: 112
From: Northern NY
I would agree with Marginmn in respect to the HP vs Bravos. On a 35 you might get away with 700 and Bravos, not a good deal on the heavier 42. The other thing that plays into this is that with the 42 you can, and will just because you can, run harder in bigger water and the constant load - unload of the drive will crush it. We all say we plan to take it easy on things so they stay together, but then the fun factor of going fast kicks in and poof goes the drive. Been there done that, ain't fun. Did three in one week some years ago.
Boat looks good, I would check the converted from a triple deal out. But you could turn the boost down, make 600 hp, or so, and be happy if the speed is not a real big deal. You will likely be ok as long as you keep them checked and serviced. Why not look into the 99 42 they have with 500s, not as fast but far more reliable, or the newer 42 EX they have.
Boat looks good, I would check the converted from a triple deal out. But you could turn the boost down, make 600 hp, or so, and be happy if the speed is not a real big deal. You will likely be ok as long as you keep them checked and serviced. Why not look into the 99 42 they have with 500s, not as fast but far more reliable, or the newer 42 EX they have.
Last edited by RaggedEdge; 01-29-2009 at 06:04 PM.
#6
Registered
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
I think it looks like a really nice package personally. I don't have much experience in the bigger boats, but I think those Konrads deserve a little more credit then people are giving them. How many hundreds of 42's are out there with B1XR's.
I would say that do to the weight of the 42 the drives won't last as long due to the extra weight but alot will depend on where you boat, driving habbits, etc...
I would say that do to the weight of the 42 the drives won't last as long due to the extra weight but alot will depend on where you boat, driving habbits, etc...
#8
Registered

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,073
Likes: 79
From: Fort Worth, TX
I have 72 hours on a 40' heavy conventional v-bottom with 700HP engines. In addition, Im not running couplers, im running a direct drive shaft and to top it off, 5 blade props. Im doing everything that is said to be "bad". I change the gear lube like socks, but I have yet to have drive problems. I realize the fountain has a higher X and may unload them more often.
Im running IMCO drives. I wouldnt fear this boat too much as long as the conversion from 3 to 2 is clean.
Im running IMCO drives. I wouldnt fear this boat too much as long as the conversion from 3 to 2 is clean.


