Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
considering purchasing a fountain >

considering purchasing a fountain

Notices

considering purchasing a fountain

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-07-2011, 07:54 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default considering purchasing a fountain

I am new to this forum and wanted some peoples opinions. I am considering purchasing a 32 fever. The boat I am looking at is a 91 fever with the 2 454 385 hp. The boat looks brand new. Any one have any suggestions of what I should look for... what they like about them, what they hate about them. I am also looking at a 96 fever with the 502s.
Matt89 is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:46 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
TRL505's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt89
I am new to this forum and wanted some peoples opinions. I am considering purchasing a 32 fever. The boat I am looking at is a 91 fever with the 2 454 385 hp. The boat looks brand new. Any one have any suggestions of what I should look for... what they like about them, what they hate about them. I am also looking at a 96 fever with the 502s.
I would lean towards the 96...as the hull would be stepped. We owned a 97' 32 Fever with 525SC's...absolutely loved the boat. Kept it for 8 yrs before we bought our 42. If you are boating in fresh water...a 32 is plenty of boat for most waters. 502's are rock solid...and probably an 80MPH+ boat. Good luck.
TRL505 is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:51 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 5,325
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

If you're lookig for a real clean 32 send me a PM and I can hook you up with a friend of mine. He has a real nice 32 and is looking for a 35 right now.
RaggedEdge is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 06:12 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Ragged Edge, that 32 wouldnt be the legend signiture series would it?
BLUEMAGIC is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 08:26 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

96 will be faster but will suck more gas and cost more on insurance. Are you concerned with speed or not. My 29 does 70 but i rarely even do above 50-55, so why have a boat that does 80? Just depends on what you want. If the 96 is in worse shape I would take the older one. Stepped hulls depending on how many steps are not as good in rough water either
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 09:18 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aledo,Texas
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
96 will be faster but will suck more gas and cost more on insurance. Are you concerned with speed or not. My 29 does 70 but i rarely even do above 50-55, so why have a boat that does 80? Just depends on what you want. If the 96 is in worse shape I would take the older one. Stepped hulls depending on how many steps are not as good in rough water either
Why have a boat that will do 80? Because we can. Why have a car that will do 200? Because we can.
dewayne6243 is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 09:35 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nashville, tn
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
96 will be faster but will suck more gas and cost more on insurance. Are you concerned with speed or not. My 29 does 70 but i rarely even do above 50-55, so why have a boat that does 80? Just depends on what you want. If the 96 is in worse shape I would take the older one. Stepped hulls depending on how many steps are not as good in rough water either
Why will it suck more gas. looks like to me if you have the same power and the hull is faster it would mean it is more efficient therefor using less gas.
Allen
29scarab10 is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 10:17 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dewayne6243
Why have a boat that will do 80? Because we can. Why have a car that will do 200? Because we can.
I was waiting for the this obivous stupid response. I get what you are saying. But speed it not important to everybody and that's all I was pointing out.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 10:19 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 29scarab10
Why will it suck more gas. looks like to me if you have the same power and the hull is faster it would mean it is more efficient therefor using less gas.
Allen
newer one has bigger engines, thus will suck more fuel. All things to think about. Also repair and part availability on 454 is better than 502 and larger. With that said if I owned a 32 I would either want fuel injected 454's or 502's. Either way I would think 454's would push a 32 to clost to 65.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 11:06 AM
  #10  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
NWPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Entiat, Washington
Posts: 229
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default

A 502 in a stepped hull will get better mileage the a 454 in a non-stepped hull at the same speed. The difference in insurance would be only if the value was more or it went over 100mph. Why would it be worse in rough water? Buy the boat that does 60 and you will wish you bought the one that does 80.
NWPC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.