'02 38 Lightning semi-stagger
#1
Currently I have IMCO Extreme SC's w/-1 lowers, 1.5:1 and 35P Hering 6 blades. 102.5 GPS is all she's got Scotty.
I'm going to change to SCX uppers and contemplating -2s and 1.35:1.
There's also the SCX -4's but with the added cost of #6 props and through hull PU's for the engines I'd need to see a 10MPH gain to do it.
Thoughts, please
Experiences, pretty please
Thanks
Rob
Existing drives will be for sale after I figure out how much $$$$ I need when this done.
I'm going to change to SCX uppers and contemplating -2s and 1.35:1.
There's also the SCX -4's but with the added cost of #6 props and through hull PU's for the engines I'd need to see a 10MPH gain to do it.
Thoughts, please
Experiences, pretty please
Thanks
Rob
Existing drives will be for sale after I figure out how much $$$$ I need when this done.
#3
Hopefully I'll be back together in a couple of months.
The existing uppers have 80 hours since new gears and bearings.
The lowers have 100 hours since new.
Before pricing and selling I'm pulling the pinions and upper gears out, and the propshafts and driven gears out for pics.
That way there are NO questions.
BTW I'm planning on using the SC-2 lowers NOT the SCX lowers.
Inputs????
The existing uppers have 80 hours since new gears and bearings.
The lowers have 100 hours since new.
Before pricing and selling I'm pulling the pinions and upper gears out, and the propshafts and driven gears out for pics.
That way there are NO questions.
BTW I'm planning on using the SC-2 lowers NOT the SCX lowers.
Inputs????
#4
Nothing? Darn.
How about:
I'm fairly certain an Arneson would perform well so;
The -4SCX would put the propshaft level with the keel.
Would the Bravo/Arneson conversion do the same?
Does the Bravo/Arneson put the prop further back or keep it in the same spot as a Bravo drive?
I have the "pad" so Fountain says I don't need a box, "it's built in".
Any thoughts?
How about:
I'm fairly certain an Arneson would perform well so;
The -4SCX would put the propshaft level with the keel.
Would the Bravo/Arneson conversion do the same?
Does the Bravo/Arneson put the prop further back or keep it in the same spot as a Bravo drive?
I have the "pad" so Fountain says I don't need a box, "it's built in".
Any thoughts?
#6
Guessing 1.34:1 ratio. Up river or down? does it matter?
Ive always wanted to go down the Columbia for the extra 8+ MPH
#7
Nothing? Darn.
How about:
I'm fairly certain an Arneson would perform well so;
The -4SCX would put the propshaft level with the keel.
Would the Bravo/Arneson conversion do the same?
Does the Bravo/Arneson put the prop further back or keep it in the same spot as a Bravo drive?
I have the "pad" so Fountain says I don't need a box, "it's built in".
Any thoughts?
How about:
I'm fairly certain an Arneson would perform well so;
The -4SCX would put the propshaft level with the keel.
Would the Bravo/Arneson conversion do the same?
Does the Bravo/Arneson put the prop further back or keep it in the same spot as a Bravo drive?
I have the "pad" so Fountain says I don't need a box, "it's built in".
Any thoughts?
The propeller shaft height is adjustable with the Arneson so there is no problem getting the height so to speak.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
#9
The Arnesons work very well on the 38's as well as the other Fountains. The propeller will be further aft when you are comparing the non boxed Bravo to the Arneson.
The propeller shaft height is adjustable with the Arneson so there is no problem getting the height so to speak.
The propeller shaft height is adjustable with the Arneson so there is no problem getting the height so to speak.
#10





