29 Fountain Fever
#12
Registered
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 557
Likes: 4
From: Fox Island, WA
I asked a lot of questions at the dealership where I bought my 29'. He had both a 525 single and the 6.2 twin. The 525 boat is about 5 m.p.h. faster. The twin 6.2 gets on a plane easier and runs pretty hard but the 525 boat will eventually run it down. The 525 boat will be easier to work on. Expect to freshen up the heads at 250 hours. Then there are the headers... 3k to replace (or pretty close to that) and many folks who own these engines have their headers pressure checked once per season. I'm not sure how much this costs or how many hours it takes to R&R the headers. The 6.2s should be good for about 850 hours with good oil coolers. This is the word from the dealer where I purchased my boat. There are many knowledgeable folks on this forum that have personal experience on the 525 engines. Hopefully someone while chime in. In closing all the 29' Fever owners seem to like their boats. The stepped hull is amazing compared to a standard deep V. Good luck finding your new boat!
#15
Registered
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 4
From: Thousand Islands area
have a 91 with twin 454's and it takes 1-2 chop great the faster you go the better. I hit 70mph with 23p props. Test sheet from fountain says 77mph with 25p props, which sounds crazy, but get a different pitch with twin BBCs your talking 73-75. Single 525 probably give you more speed, but its not going to save half of the gas. And I looked at them and personally didnt want to have refresh things at 250hours when a 454 or 502 can go probably twice that. But a single engine will be easier to work on and means less cost on annual maint type things at least.
Currently have my 91 up for semi quasi sale right now, looking for the right taker.
Currently have my 91 up for semi quasi sale right now, looking for the right taker.
#16
Registered

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 2
I too was looking for a 29 with a 525. I decided that I didn't want to deal with the 250 to 300 hour refresh on the motor which most of the 29's I saw advertised were close to. It's not just the expense. It's finding someone who can do it and the motor reliable afterwords. Also the header issue. There is a thread here that shows you what happens if the headers leak. You have to find someone to leak test too. I am mechanically inclined and have the tools, but not the time. I also think a single engine boat is the way to go. I have had several twin engine boats and it's twice the maintainance. I find in my boat that I am seldom at wide open throttle. Occasionaly when by myself. My 496 '27 will run 68mph or so and 496's last forever. In 10 seasons I have had zero problems. Every one knows how to work on a 496 because they use them in everything. They did some 29's with 496HO's in them. Unless I really had to have a 29 I would just buy a 27 with a 496HO. Runs 68 to 70 use any gas and bullet proof.
Just my opionion after many hours of thinking about it and looking at it.
Just my opionion after many hours of thinking about it and looking at it.
#19
Registered

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 2
The stock Bravo 28P. I had BBlades make a custom prop for it that was a cut down 30 and lab finished. The first try was 62 MPH. I sent it back and now 64 MPH. So now the stock prop is back on it.
1.65 drive RH. The RPM would only get to 4800 with the BB prop.
1.65 drive RH. The RPM would only get to 4800 with the BB prop.
Last edited by carcommander; 02-05-2014 at 10:25 AM.
#20
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 230
Likes: 1
From: Streamwood, Il.
Anyone know anything about the 2006 with the ilmor 625 being sold in texas? I read up on it as one of the owners discussed the project.........the dealer told me it came that way from the factory - I had a good chuckle.........anyone have info? WHy was the interior completely replaced? Just because or??? Dealer claims 92mph - what I read states high 70's with a best of 81........any info would be great........



