Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
Performance diff between27 Fever single vs Twins??? >

Performance diff between27 Fever single vs Twins???

Notices

Performance diff between27 Fever single vs Twins???

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-05-2017, 08:39 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Performance diff between27 Fever single vs Twins???

Aside from the ease of docking, can you guys help me understand how the fever 27 will behave differently between the twin 454 set up and the single 509? I'm considering buying one of the two, and currently evaluating an early 1990's w/twin 454's versus a mid 1990's w/a single 509.

I've never run one before, so I need some advice as to what differences to expect between the two setups..

Thx!!!
screamindemon is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 09:22 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Lake George, NY
Posts: 1,244
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Buy the single. Ease of maintenance. A small 27 with twins is way to ass heavy.
class6 is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 05:34 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thx!!!........ but how severe do you think the additional weight impacts performance on this hull?... as in needing to walk people up to the bow in order to get on plane or just a bit squatty when running at speed? I'm trying to figure out how much (or whether at all) the additional hp offsets the ass end weight of the 2nd motor? One motor is always attractive from a maintence point of view, but if there are material performance gains of having 2 motors, I'd probably lean that way...

I may just have to drive them both to know for sure, but would love to hear more opinions and advice!!!!

Thx!!!!
screamindemon is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 07:09 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,059
Received 417 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

The larger Fountains look like they are sinking in the rear. I couldn't imagine a 27 with twins.
underpsi68 is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 07:13 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 705
Received 133 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

The 27 is only available with a single. 29+ for twins.

I may add to this that IF you plan on working on your boat yourself instead of paying someone, you better not be a fat guy because the bilges are tight with twins.

Last edited by Diamond Dave; 07-05-2017 at 07:26 PM.
Diamond Dave is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 07:26 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lakewood, NY, USA
Posts: 3,482
Received 317 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diamond Dave
The 27 is only available with a single. 29+ for twins.
That is what I was thinking but then again I am am Velocity guy. LOL.

Padraig
Padraig is offline  
Old 07-05-2017, 08:43 PM
  #7  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
rak rua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Thailand
Posts: 3,521
Received 1,124 Likes on 474 Posts
Default

I think there was a very small number of 27's built with twins but it was too much weight in the stern for a smallish 27.

Dont get lured in by the thought of twin engines, big power, big noise, look at me stuff. A well set up single in any boat of that size can run very close to the speed of a twin and your maintenance is a dream by comparison.

As said above, a 27 stern is low in the water, put twins in one and I reckon the water will be lapping over your swim platform.

Single all the way!

RR
rak rua is offline  
Old 07-06-2017, 09:10 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I specifically bought a single because I didn't want twins. I do a lot of my own maintenance and twins in a narrow boat are hard to work on. Plus the performance isn't that much different.
carcommander is offline  
Old 07-06-2017, 10:32 AM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Henderson, KY
Posts: 2,167
Received 80 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I would not buy a 27 or 29 with twins. I do most of my own work on my boats. Have owned a 27 Fountain Fever (single 502), a 35 Fountain Lightning (575's side by side), and now a 42 Lightning (staggerred 700's). The 27 single was fairly easy to work on, as far as room is concerned. The 35 side by side was a b!tch to work on always. The 42 seems relatively easy, although I've only winterized, oil changes, and sea pumps on this one (so far).

I just can't imagine working on a 27 or 32 with twins. Just replacing a sea pump would be a nightmare, I'd think.

My advice is find a 29 Fever with a 525 - friend of mine had one. Great river, small lake boat. Cockpit is just a little bit bigger than the 27 - 27 is tight with 4 people aboard.

Originally Posted by underpsi68
The larger Fountains look like they are sinking in the rear. I couldn't imagine a 27 with twins.
This is not true, unless they have excessive water in bilge or are sinking. 27's, 29's, 35's, 42's, 47's all sit nice in the water. The 32's do not - rub rail is generally underwater while docked. Not a good situation, in my opinion.

My .02
ALL_IN! is offline  
Old 07-06-2017, 11:33 AM
  #10  
ben
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wright City, MO
Posts: 379
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

You do not want to work on a 27, 29, or 32 fountain with twins. it is a nightmare to do anything. My vote would be a 29 with a single, great performance and easy to work on.
ben is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.