Spy pics of the new Dragon!!
#22
Originally Posted by TwinStepGun
Hey dude, maybe you should grow up a little......
Git em Craig!
Git em Craig!

__________________
Happily retired and living in Heavens waiting room.
Happily retired and living in Heavens waiting room.
#23
Originally Posted by customryder
perhaps you should call someone that don't sell \ make them,
my point was the boat is underpowered with the 525 & sixes. maybe its a race boat? that is required to run that way.
my point was the boat is underpowered with the 525 & sixes. maybe its a race boat? that is required to run that way.
#24
Registered
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,812
Likes: 2
From: Paducah KY KY Lake
Originally Posted by birdog
Since nobody ever told you....The #6 boat has big teague power....The 525 pic was a diff. boat.{Post #3} 

#25
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,569
Likes: 4,534
From: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Originally Posted by EricT
Not a big fan of...dare I say it...Pink. At least this one will be rigged properly form the beginning.


WOW, Eric from left field....Did Gregg call you??
#26
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,569
Likes: 4,534
From: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Originally Posted by customryder
maybe I'm missing something... i thought Erics boat was blue?
#30
Originally Posted by OldSchool
That is NOT correct. I got tired of hearing that crap and contacted Mercury Racing. I got a return call from the head engineer of the #6 program and talked with him for a good 20 minutes. He told me that, according to their research, a #6 dry-sump eats up 12 HP at 6000rpm's. A wet-sump drive eats up about 35 HP more than the dry-sump. Of course you have to add the HP loss from a transmission to this as well, but I would say that it is safe to assume that a dry sump setup would eat up less than the 30 HP that a Bravo does. I heard that the Spiderman Skater actually picked up speed by swapping to #6's.




