Your Tax dollars HARD @ WORK!!
#21
Originally posted by supercrash:
<STRONG>Those people planted some cat hairs...Big deal..Like Politicians never lie..
If you guys want to attack a real criminal then here is some ammo..
.I feel they need to "fix" data when faced with a person like Bu$h is trying to destroy the planet as fast as he can..Dean.. This is how they justify anything to further thier agenda
[ 01-23-2002: Message edited by: supercrash ]</STRONG>
<STRONG>Those people planted some cat hairs...Big deal..Like Politicians never lie..
If you guys want to attack a real criminal then here is some ammo..
.I feel they need to "fix" data when faced with a person like Bu$h is trying to destroy the planet as fast as he can..Dean.. This is how they justify anything to further thier agenda
[ 01-23-2002: Message edited by: supercrash ]</STRONG>
I bet that's the same way the terrorists justify their actions. And why didn't the water get cleaned up during the the 2 terms Clinton and Bore were in charge
__________________
Pete
Pete
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dean..The man with all the opinions..Goes crazy when someone plants cat hair..but is fine with Bushes behavior..Clinton tryed to put measures into effect to save the environment..But when Bush took office he reversed all of them..Sorry gmhdfan..try a search before posting...Look at his record on Texas..And he says he wants to do for the country what he did for Texas..And his policy reversals reflect that..
Dean do you have the OJ disease??Afraid to speak up about bushes actions..How can planting cat hair compare to the destruction of the environment..I don't know???Can anybody find the manhood to stand up and say..-I support Bush's policy on the environment-...With his polls at 90% it should be no problem to find someone..
try www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020109074801.htm
[ 01-23-2002: Message edited by: supercrash ]
Dean do you have the OJ disease??Afraid to speak up about bushes actions..How can planting cat hair compare to the destruction of the environment..I don't know???Can anybody find the manhood to stand up and say..-I support Bush's policy on the environment-...With his polls at 90% it should be no problem to find someone..
try www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020109074801.htm
[ 01-23-2002: Message edited by: supercrash ]
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
You Bush supporters are cowards..With all his supporters here I find it hard to belive that no one will stand up and say they support bushes policy on the environment..But somebody planted cat hair!!What a huge crime..If you are reading this and you support Bu$h's running of Texas then please post your view..
Prediction...Nobody will answer with support for his policys on the environment.
Prediction...Nobody will answer with support for his policys on the environment.
#24
Charter Member#1545
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Grand Junction, Co.
Crash, in todays diversified ecological climate it is easy to show depletion and extinction, many groups make it their appointed duty to do so. The real truth is often mired in so much unseen diplomacy that the real facts are often unclear. The Global warming for instance. This has been debated until it is so confusing and controversial that you can make a very clear point on either side. In my humble 02, a person could research these environmental issues 24\7, and then after accumulating as much documentation as possible, choose your side and make your argument, pro or con. This is still just the perception and belief of the person and unfortunately the basis of said perceptions are often, not always but many times prejudiced. I live in a very diverse area, I am an avid outdoorsman and believe in protecting our environment. That said I will also say I "DO NOT" agree with land closures and such. This may be a little off topic here, but it is applicable to your question on Bush's policies. If previous agendas had been upheld, hundreds of thousands of acres of land in Colorado would have been off limits to many like myself. If you ever have the opportunity to see the areas we have access to, and areas that are in better condition than years past, you would be in awe. To close said areas, the only ones that will enjoy these places are the very few who can spend weeks accessing these areas. It is usually a very small group that try to enact these precidents and yes, there are areas that need regulated(high density areas), but incredibly large areas are in pristine condition and should be enjoyed by you and I. The bottom line, a person could take either side and make a great argument for said issue. Come out to Colorado sometime and let me show you some awesome country and try and "lighten" up your point of view a little.
#28
Charter Member#1545
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
From: Grand Junction, Co.
Crash, reread it. It basically says we all have opinions and choices. How we choose to enact them is what establishes respect and encourage others to believe so. If the land closures were enacted you could go in these areas, yes, albeit by foot though. This is very limiting to many due to the distance. Hundreds of miles is somewhat of a restriction when families and such are to be taken into consideration. In my case, family is my biggest consideration. I don't expect you to agree, that is your right and I respect this. On the other hand, if someone doesn't agree with you, maybe you should'nt be so offended.
#29
Registered

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: On the back of a chicks M3..If you're gonna ride my ass at least pull my hair!!
Hmmmm.....I wonder and ponder......Is SuperDump and Catnothinto do the same F!@#ING PERSON???????
Holy chit.......would you guys stop it.......
Holy chit.......would you guys stop it.......


