Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question.......... >

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-24-2007 | 03:58 PM
  #101  
monstaaa's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 3
From: long island, newyork
Default

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
montassa,

Your right with that and I guess it's relative to the size of the dimples. The porus side lifts easier because the contact patch is so much smaller than the smooth side.

I think the dynamics change when water is passing by something at 80 mph as compared to being static?

Only one way to tell make yourself a little test bed and video tape it, I don't know what will happen - maybe it works?

Debating a tech issue as you know only goes so far, you have make it and test it to get real data whether it is virtual or physical testing.

i have tried this theory, and it is good for 1 to 1.5 after the 85 mark. so in these cases it did work. i do agree about trying every theory before commenting on it directly.
monstaaa is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2007 | 01:30 PM
  #102  
Semper Fi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 8
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
i have tried this theory, and it is good for 1 to 1.5 after the 85 mark. so in these cases it did work. i do agree about trying every theory before commenting on it directly.
Good point.
Semper Fi is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 12:19 AM
  #103  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights MI
Default

The dimples on a golf ball move the seperation point of the air from the ball, reducing turbulence and thus drag.


This was not discovered by scientists, but, by players noticing that their well dented gutta percha golf balls traveled farther.

I don't think it will work on a boat hull bottom.
Attached Thumbnails Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-aeroball.jpg  
vtec is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 06:58 AM
  #104  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

surf boards have used dimples for speed for a few years now.

Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 07:02 AM
  #105  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
a good analogy is pouring a little water on a waxed tile floor then droping a waxed tile shiny side down on top of the water . then trying to pick it up. wont be easy. flip the tile to the un finished satin side and it lifts .
same method or theory when wet sanding the bottom fore to aft.
Yes but on the smooth side the tile will slide from side to side much easier. America's cup boat spend more money on speed then anyone and they no longer sand the bottoms they make them as perfectly smooth as they can.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 10:11 AM
  #106  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Default

Surfboards must benefit from dimples holding contact with with water for high speed control.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 10:13 AM
  #107  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Default

I recall the ABN Amro boat won the ocean race. I saw it in Annapolis and the entire hull was dull from apparent wet sanding.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 04:08 PM
  #108  
Enforcer2's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 831
Likes: 2
From: Ocean Pines, Maryland. Wish I was at MANGOS in MIAMI!
Default

Originally Posted by TUFFboat
My first question is how fast is the package going to go? If you only go around 65mph, keep the motors low. Gains from reduced drag of high motor position won't show up until your around 75-80 +. If your going slower than that with a high motor setting, you will lose percentage slip and the ability to carry the bow with trim. That could make you slower.
Tuff boat....my buddies Midnight is about 12000= pounds. He has quad 300 optis on a 24" set back bracket and his over revving at 6k+ with 28 B1's runing 85 on gps.

My boat is going to be extremely lighter due to resin type and foam coring. Estimated 30% lighter.

I have 36" of set back on bracket and another 12" with notched transom.

I will be must likely be going with quad 250 efis. So I plan on running the same speed 85++if not more.......

So to pose question again ...........with notched transom and set back on 24degree deep Vee how high can I go.

Max top end is the goal.
Enforcer2 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 07:24 PM
  #109  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Default

Enforcer, 36 inches and 12 inch notch. I think You'll be lucky to hit the set up on first try. Do you plan on cowlings almost touching and solid mounts? You might end up with center engines higher relative to the bottom then the outside. The outer motors will take a whopping barking in choppy water. I would think you will start with them up 9 inches or shafts even with the bottom given the are so far back. The center two maybe higher. The water will rise about 1 inch per foot of set back. I also think you'll want 3/4s of your prop in the water to carry the boat. Ultimately you may change the height a few times before your happy. If you can take pictures or measure your buddies boat it will certainly help cut down test time.
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 12-30-2007 | 07:36 PM
  #110  
Enforcer2's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 831
Likes: 2
From: Ocean Pines, Maryland. Wish I was at MANGOS in MIAMI!
Default

Thanks for the reply. they will be on 24" centers, the beam is 9'6, I will be most likely going with pre 2002 motors-(skinny cowlings)also due to cost of four and $$$$ trying to get most bang for buck and can't see spending 70K on new engines.

I was running my old Midnight with shafts even with bottom. I will do this again. I have been lookin at a lot of set ups. It looks like the Sutphen with quads uses 20"s on outers and 30"s on centers. But the beam is not as wide.

I also put my buddies Midnight in here, he is running 20's on outers and 25 centers. But his bracket is set up for 25 centers and he does not have a notched transom.

And also a Fountain.

We were both wondering how the water flow off of the v to notched transom and then to bracket will channge set up or effect the handling speed etc...

I have set my bracket up for 30" centers. Just wondering if I can get way with 25"s in center????

Thanks for the help ,Tony
Attached Thumbnails Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-sutphen-quad.jpg   Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-tommys-mid-quad.jpg   Conventional V-bottom hydronamics question..........-fountain-quad.jpg  

Enforcer2 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.