Gas Going To $7.00 A Gallon by 2010
#11
Registered

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
This is all a self fulfilling prophecy. Oil is a critical component of our economy and yet they allow speculators to materially affect pricing on the open market. If they want to get serious about stabilizing oil prices, a good start would be halting oil futures trading. Germany is already considering it.

Besides that, what is speculation anyway? It just means oil is being priced at what it is worth at the moment. No one has a corner on the oil market.
Instead of everyone complaining, you have to look at alternatives. I think natural gas is our best bet for a transportation fuel. It's much cheaper than gasoline, and the US has huge NG reserves. There are some tradeoffs in terms of vehicle range, but everything has a tradeoff. Second thing is to stop burning natural gas to produce electricity. That's just a waste.
Michael
Last edited by Michael1; 06-27-2008 at 08:53 PM.
#13
So you have two years to increase your income enough to still afford to go boating.Yes if this happens it will end high performance boating for anyone making an average income.Make sure you are not in that group and you will be fine
#14
One idea: Has anybody ever considered the fact that the higher the price goes the more tax dollars the gov't gets.....the same gov't that is trillions in the hole. Then they set up a committee to look at the problem, a committee they know couldn't resolve anything.
Second idea: Could it be our gov't is trying to covertly address the global warming "issue" that they haven't been paying attention to over the past 40 years. Could the high price of fuel be one way to basically MAKE Americans start to automatically address the situation???? Probably 90% of new car buyers are shopping for mileage when purchase.....which is exactly what the gov't wants.
I love conspiracy
The other night I was half in the bag doing a little channel surfing. I ended up on CSPAN. It was coverage of the "gas crisis Committee". I was in a trance with the babble that was dripping out of these peoples faces. If you ever get bored...I mean real bored, flip on CSPAN and grab a good cocktail.
Second idea: Could it be our gov't is trying to covertly address the global warming "issue" that they haven't been paying attention to over the past 40 years. Could the high price of fuel be one way to basically MAKE Americans start to automatically address the situation???? Probably 90% of new car buyers are shopping for mileage when purchase.....which is exactly what the gov't wants.
I love conspiracy

The other night I was half in the bag doing a little channel surfing. I ended up on CSPAN. It was coverage of the "gas crisis Committee". I was in a trance with the babble that was dripping out of these peoples faces. If you ever get bored...I mean real bored, flip on CSPAN and grab a good cocktail.
#15
Registered
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Rolla/LOTO MO
#16
If gas goes to $7.00 a gallon we will have much bigger problem on our hands to worry about, I guess I will just take the boats to Venesuela and buy it for 25 Cents a gallon.
In all seriousness, if it goes that high our economy will stop, thus will the worlds.
In all seriousness, if it goes that high our economy will stop, thus will the worlds.
#17
Enjoy it now boys and girls. In the not to distant future, we may look back on 2008, as having available gas at only $5.00/gal.
We may be reaching the end of the era of affordable oil based fuels. Thank you bleeding heart, liberal, tree hugger, dems.
I fear we may also be nearing the end of the republic, as we know it. Just look at the candidates for pres.
We may be reaching the end of the era of affordable oil based fuels. Thank you bleeding heart, liberal, tree hugger, dems.
I fear we may also be nearing the end of the republic, as we know it. Just look at the candidates for pres.
#18
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Easier said then done...............
#19
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Ironically, if that were to happen, our problems would be over.
If the average American became more productive and became more fiscally responsible, our national wealth would skyrocket. That would cause significant strengthening of our dollar and, as if by magic, all these issues would evaporate.
Remember, if the dollar doubled in value against the world currency market, oil would cost half what it does today.
I also believe the there needs to be sweeping change in the way petroleum is traded and speculated against.
If the average American became more productive and became more fiscally responsible, our national wealth would skyrocket. That would cause significant strengthening of our dollar and, as if by magic, all these issues would evaporate.
Remember, if the dollar doubled in value against the world currency market, oil would cost half what it does today.
I also believe the there needs to be sweeping change in the way petroleum is traded and speculated against.
#20
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
One other thing- markets find their own natural equilibrium. Whether or not people like to hear it, oil was not overpriced until just recently. Speaking from a market perspective, nothing that people continue to purchase is over-valued. Once regular unleaded moved past the $3.50 a gallon barrier, consumption dropped significantly. It's going to take a while for the markets to react and the speculative facet adds buoyancy to the pricing but I don't believe $7 unleaded is a realistically conceivable thing.
At the same time, I can't say it wouldn't be advantageous to the oil companies. Even selling half the volume, double the price doesn't just net them the same net revenues. The shed a whole expensive load of production and infrastructure costs. I think at that point, you'd have a legislative lynch mob fast-tracking the nationalization of oil and gas under the premise that the manipulation of their supply presents a clear and present danger to the security of the US.
Maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing.
At the same time, I can't say it wouldn't be advantageous to the oil companies. Even selling half the volume, double the price doesn't just net them the same net revenues. The shed a whole expensive load of production and infrastructure costs. I think at that point, you'd have a legislative lynch mob fast-tracking the nationalization of oil and gas under the premise that the manipulation of their supply presents a clear and present danger to the security of the US.
Maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing.


