Slow Oso Problem Solved.. NOT !!!!
#11
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St Johns, FL
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah, the irony. The site became unreachable for me just after I noticed the "slow OSO problem solved" link at the top. I clicked on it, and couldn't get the site to load for 2 hours.
And don't tell me about Firefox. I was one of the first to point it out, and i've been running Firefox for 3 years now.
And don't tell me about Firefox. I was one of the first to point it out, and i've been running Firefox for 3 years now.
#14
#15
PF Marine
Platinum Member
Nah, I just want to able to say i'm not a paying member for all of the slow loading crap (or not loading at all) that goes on. I'll still log in tho, just won't pay in the future. It's a shame, there is alot of good info on this site, and IB just seems to want to throw everything away.
Last edited by Coolerman; 10-09-2008 at 12:13 AM.
#16
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
#18
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You've got to be kidding me. This site only works correctly with 1 browser???? Great job IB, you guys could F-up a train wreck. I will not download a browser to accommodate your site nor will I press 1.
#19
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bucyrus, Ohio
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yesterday, I went to click on the Slow Oso Problem Solved: link and it wouldnt load. Couldnt get on at all last night.
Then I decided........
F U C K I T !!!
Im not downloading Firefox for one website that should be fast.
New Tagline.............
OffshoreOnly
Fast Boats, Slow Website!
Then I decided........
F U C K I T !!!
Im not downloading Firefox for one website that should be fast.
New Tagline.............
OffshoreOnly
Fast Boats, Slow Website!
#20
Registered
Firefox is a good browser, i use it as well, but it can't make slow websites fast.
I can't read these threads any more, especially the silly answers.
The reason somewhere else. Here is the free analysis why:
22.3K 1 HTML/Text
59.4K 14 JavaScript Files
2.7K 2 Stylesheet Files
7.1K 4 CSS Images
455.2K 41 Images
5.6K 2 Unknowns
552.5K Total size
64 HTTP requests
Lot's of http requests that take time, not minized css and js files, old fashion html, to large images.
A standard click loads 550k of data->too much.
It would take a good developer 2 -3 days to improve the page load by 30%. The owner of OSO could save lot's of $$ in money for the servers if they would minimize the load....
Heiko
I can't read these threads any more, especially the silly answers.
The reason somewhere else. Here is the free analysis why:
22.3K 1 HTML/Text
59.4K 14 JavaScript Files
2.7K 2 Stylesheet Files
7.1K 4 CSS Images
455.2K 41 Images
5.6K 2 Unknowns
552.5K Total size
64 HTTP requests
Lot's of http requests that take time, not minized css and js files, old fashion html, to large images.
A standard click loads 550k of data->too much.
It would take a good developer 2 -3 days to improve the page load by 30%. The owner of OSO could save lot's of $$ in money for the servers if they would minimize the load....
Heiko