Slow Oso Problem Solved.. NOT !!!!
10-08-2008 | 09:21 PM
#11
Registered
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: St Johns, FL
Ah, the irony. The site became unreachable for me just after I noticed the "slow OSO problem solved" link at the top. I clicked on it, and couldn't get the site to load for 2 hours.
And don't tell me about Firefox. I was one of the first to point it out, and i've been running Firefox for 3 years now.
And don't tell me about Firefox. I was one of the first to point it out, and i've been running Firefox for 3 years now.
10-09-2008 | 12:10 AM
#15
PF Marine
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 24
From: Dallas, TX
Nah, I just want to able to say i'm not a paying member for all of the slow loading crap (or not loading at all) that goes on. I'll still log in tho, just won't pay in the future. It's a shame, there is alot of good info on this site, and IB just seems to want to throw everything away.
Last edited by Coolerman; 10-09-2008 at 12:13 AM.
10-09-2008 | 07:37 AM
#18
Registered
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Oh
You've got to be kidding me. This site only works correctly with 1 browser???? Great job IB, you guys could F-up a train wreck. I will not download a browser to accommodate your site nor will I press 1.
10-09-2008 | 07:47 AM
#19
Registered
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,636
Likes: 0
From: Bucyrus, Ohio
Yesterday, I went to click on the Slow Oso Problem Solved: link and it wouldnt load. Couldnt get on at all last night.
Then I decided........
F U C K I T !!!
Im not downloading Firefox for one website that should be fast.
New Tagline.............
OffshoreOnly
Fast Boats, Slow Website!
Then I decided........
F U C K I T !!!
Im not downloading Firefox for one website that should be fast.
New Tagline.............
OffshoreOnly
Fast Boats, Slow Website!
10-09-2008 | 07:52 AM
#20
Registered
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 3
From: Frankfurt
Firefox is a good browser, i use it as well, but it can't make slow websites fast.
I can't read these threads any more, especially the silly answers.
The reason somewhere else. Here is the free analysis why:
22.3K 1 HTML/Text
59.4K 14 JavaScript Files
2.7K 2 Stylesheet Files
7.1K 4 CSS Images
455.2K 41 Images
5.6K 2 Unknowns
552.5K Total size
64 HTTP requests
Lot's of http requests that take time, not minized css and js files, old fashion html, to large images.
A standard click loads 550k of data->too much.
It would take a good developer 2 -3 days to improve the page load by 30%. The owner of OSO could save lot's of $$ in money for the servers if they would minimize the load....
Heiko
I can't read these threads any more, especially the silly answers.
The reason somewhere else. Here is the free analysis why:
22.3K 1 HTML/Text
59.4K 14 JavaScript Files
2.7K 2 Stylesheet Files
7.1K 4 CSS Images
455.2K 41 Images
5.6K 2 Unknowns
552.5K Total size
64 HTTP requests
Lot's of http requests that take time, not minized css and js files, old fashion html, to large images.
A standard click loads 550k of data->too much.
It would take a good developer 2 -3 days to improve the page load by 30%. The owner of OSO could save lot's of $$ in money for the servers if they would minimize the load....
Heiko
