View Poll Results: Who Thinks Long Duck Dong should be Long Gone from OSO
Voters: 192. You may not vote on this poll
Long Duck Dong
11-24-2008 | 08:38 AM
#701
Gold Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood, MD
I think I speak for most people on here when i say that this is an issue of human morality. There is a right and wrong thing to do here regardless of what contracts were signed.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
11-24-2008 | 08:44 AM
#702
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
I think you & I are the same..... no way in hell would either of us sign that contract. In my post I said finish the contract then sue over the dock rash. That simple! What Pro Boy did was slap some KY between his cheeks (sign the contract). Then bend over and grab his ankles (not comply with the contract).
WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So you know prostock personally ????
11-24-2008 | 08:47 AM
#703
Charter Member #232
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
I could have gone all week with out that picture being painted 
It is always hard to buy a boat or anything like this when you are not face to face. I drove from MA to VA to look at a Donzi. I asked him very specific questions about the condition of the boat. He said what I wanted to hear and I jumped in my truck with my brother and drove 12 hours down there. When I got to his house I thought it was a joke. The boat was a total POS and everything that I had asked him about the boat he had lied about. I was pissed to say the leaste and told him that I would not take the boat if he gave it to me. Then I had a nice 12 hour drive home with out the boat in tow. It amazes me what sellers think that they can get away with. With out seeing the boat first hand I would have wanted a back out clause in there in case I found something like what happened in this case of course (trailer and hull damage). From the contract it is not spelled out what the cause of action would be IF pro did not come through with the monies.
It is always hard to buy a boat or anything like this when you are not face to face. I drove from MA to VA to look at a Donzi. I asked him very specific questions about the condition of the boat. He said what I wanted to hear and I jumped in my truck with my brother and drove 12 hours down there. When I got to his house I thought it was a joke. The boat was a total POS and everything that I had asked him about the boat he had lied about. I was pissed to say the leaste and told him that I would not take the boat if he gave it to me. Then I had a nice 12 hour drive home with out the boat in tow. It amazes me what sellers think that they can get away with. With out seeing the boat first hand I would have wanted a back out clause in there in case I found something like what happened in this case of course (trailer and hull damage). From the contract it is not spelled out what the cause of action would be IF pro did not come through with the monies.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Put your best foot forward!
11-24-2008 | 08:48 AM
#704
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
So I guess the lynch mob is still in favor of not holding both parties to their word. Donger drew up a smelly contract but Pro Boy was an idiot to sign and not fully comply with. So we just let Pro Boy off cause he is too stupid to read and comprehend what he is signing? Donger owes Pro Boy a refund of what ever is above & beyond the original agreed upon price between Donger & Pro Boy. The lynch mob be hollering about Donger needing to man up? How about Pro Boy better man up to what he himself signed off on! Pro Boy got cold feet over the dock rash? COMPLETE the terms of the contract! Then sue Donger for false representation and make him pay for the repairs! I'd be right up there hollering for Donger to make right under those terms. But sign a contract and then not follow through? That ain't right either. Theres chit on both ends of the stick but the lynch mob is only sniffing on one end
2)LDD also never followed thru with a survey that was promised before the contract end.
3)LDD and Prostock spoke via e-mail the next day SATURDAY and LDD told Prostock that they could continue the dealings on Monday because it was fathersday weekend and LDD had things to do with his kid.I Have the e-mail LDD so dont make a fool of yourself again!!!!
4) The contract was signed because he had the funds to buy the boat and had all intensions of doing so till the issues arose.
5) So LDD you admit on a public forum that the money is no issue.Then why do you need a payment plan?????
Anthony
11-24-2008 | 08:50 AM
#705
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 1
From: West edge of the Pacific
Time to be fair!!!
I think I speak for most people on here when i say that this is an issue of human morality. There is a right and wrong thing to do here regardless of what contracts were signed.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
11-24-2008 | 08:51 AM
#706
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
You are right FIREFOX,so prostock broke a contract if you say so.Then refund 12,000.00 and keep the two thousand for breatch of contract.Done deal
11-24-2008 | 09:01 AM
#707
Gold Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood, MD
For me, the right thing would be to return 12k and keep the 2k for the trouble and possible loss of sale to someone else.
Last month i had a renter sign a lease to rent my old house. I took it off the market for 30 days and then 3 days before he was supposed to move in, he sent my real estate agent a letter saying that his family plans have changed and he was going to stay in D.C. and not move afterall.
Legally, i could take him to court for the $17k he owes me in rent. Instead i kept his security deposit for the 30 days that i had the house off the market. It has not rented back out yet, but I sleep well at night.
In my opinion i have a better case than LDD, but i know the difference between right and wrong. No matter what, LDD keeping 12k of someones money without providing anything in return is pure thievery.
Last month i had a renter sign a lease to rent my old house. I took it off the market for 30 days and then 3 days before he was supposed to move in, he sent my real estate agent a letter saying that his family plans have changed and he was going to stay in D.C. and not move afterall.
Legally, i could take him to court for the $17k he owes me in rent. Instead i kept his security deposit for the 30 days that i had the house off the market. It has not rented back out yet, but I sleep well at night.
In my opinion i have a better case than LDD, but i know the difference between right and wrong. No matter what, LDD keeping 12k of someones money without providing anything in return is pure thievery.
11-24-2008 | 09:02 AM
#708
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
For me, the right thing would be to return 12k and keep the 2k for the trouble and possible loss of sale to someone else.
Last month i had a renter sign a lease to rent my old house. I took it off the market for 30 days and then 3 days before he was supposed to move in, he sent my real estate agent a letter saying that his family plans have changed and he was going to stay in D.C. and not move afterall.
Legally, i could take him to court for the $17k he owes me in rent. Instead i kept his security deposit for the 30 days that i had the house off the market. It has not rented back out yet, but I sleep well at night.
In my opinion i have a better case than LDD, but i know the difference between right and wrong. No matter what, LDD keeping 12k of someones money without providing anything in return is pure thievery.
Last month i had a renter sign a lease to rent my old house. I took it off the market for 30 days and then 3 days before he was supposed to move in, he sent my real estate agent a letter saying that his family plans have changed and he was going to stay in D.C. and not move afterall.
Legally, i could take him to court for the $17k he owes me in rent. Instead i kept his security deposit for the 30 days that i had the house off the market. It has not rented back out yet, but I sleep well at night.
In my opinion i have a better case than LDD, but i know the difference between right and wrong. No matter what, LDD keeping 12k of someones money without providing anything in return is pure thievery.
11-24-2008 | 09:05 AM
#709
Registered
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
I think I speak for most people on here when i say that this is an issue of human morality. There is a right and wrong thing to do here regardless of what contracts were signed.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
I think most people would do "the right thing" and refund the 12k. contract or no contract, he's a thief in my book.
AMEN!
WTF, Remind me a piece of paper is held in a MUCH higher standard to some on this board then expecting people to "do the right thing"
Prostock hand all correspondance with this clown Dumb duck dong to a lawyer, he's a arrogant nobody still playing a 'look at me" game with no cash to pay you, he's basically stolen your inheritence and needs his rear sitting in front of a judge.
No-one is going away duck, keeping this thread at the top so people know exactly what kind of human being you are appears to be a mission of about 12K boaters, the same number YOU need to send Prostock yesterday, fool.
Keep burying yourself for future scams.
11-24-2008 | 09:13 AM
#710
Registered
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, FL
Why would someone want to possibly ruin their business over 12k. Just give the 12k back and save face.
Last edited by lawdocx3; 11-24-2008 at 09:18 AM.
