View Poll Results: Who Thinks Long Duck Dong should be Long Gone from OSO
Long Duck Dong Stays
11.98%
Long Duck Dong Goes
88.02%
Voters: 192. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree0Likes

Long Duck Dong

Closed Thread
Old 11-24-2008, 02:19 PM
  #721
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 1,807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZP'd View Post
No-one ever has said Prostock does not bear some burden for the sour grapes in this deal.
His biggest fault is being young, naive and TRUSTING of a fellow boater!
He should loose his 2K deposit and that will I'm sure teach him a lesson that there are people in this world who WILL take advantage of him and that have no problem operating thru the back door, while at the same time leaving the front door open just a crack.
Someone's true character has played out in this thread time and time again, just read. There is a snake in the grass in this deal and Prostock ain't it.
Thank God for this thread to out yet another TWO BIT SCAM ARTIST on OSO!
Why should he lose his deposite.

1) the boat was misrepresented and prostock had to find out about damages he was never told about through reading it and seeing pics on boatfreaks.

2) he attempted to pay in full monday, just one busness day after the contract expired

3) he was promised a survey by the seller and it never arrived, although he was told on numerous occasions by the seller it was on the way, or in the mail.

he should get all 14k back and then some
Boomer35 is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:24 PM
  #722
Registered
 
Pure Energy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N. NJ, Eastern LI
My Boats: 2001 Superboat Y2K
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VtSteve View Post
Is that the same boat? Looks like the price is dropping
That add does not have a date on it. I thing a broker bought it, sold it to someone, then the donger bought it. The guy who bought it from the broker probably found it needed work then sold it to donger. Donger probably found it needed work then went to sell it. That would explain why he never sent Prostock the survey, if one even existed. This is purely speculation on my part.
Pure Energy is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:36 PM
  #723
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
My Boats: Pedal Boat
Posts: 69
Default

I just read that Extreme Remarketing was registered owner of the boat. If so then the contract to sell is null and void as the Donger didn't own the boat. Contract is a fraudulent document and is null and void.
Tax_man is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:37 PM
  #724
Registered
 
Pure Energy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N. NJ, Eastern LI
My Boats: 2001 Superboat Y2K
Posts: 3,027
Default

Here's donger selling it on OSO. Notice the same pic of the boat that is in the other add I posted from a dif. seller?

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/c...cat-cheap.html
Pure Energy is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:42 PM
  #725
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Knot 4 Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central IL
My Boats: Old/Heavy/Slow
Posts: 6,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 29Firefox View Post
If it was a true matter of ethics you would have to admit that both Donger & Pro Boy are in the wrong. In this case it's not a case of ethics it's a case of as you said "It is simply a majority opinion." It's my opinion that there is fault in both parties. However the majority's opinion is that idiots should be protected from their own stupidity and we'll cover for them by putting all the blame on the other party. Go ahead, humor me! Would you have signed that contract?
I was not discussing percentages of fault on either party's behalf. I was discussing that at then end of this ordeal, the majority agree that Dong should return ProStock's money. That is the ethical thing to do. Even if ProStock was 100% wrong, I would return his money as most here would. I'm not into screwing people because they make mistakes.
Knot 4 Me is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:51 PM
  #726
Registered
 
fund razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
My Boats: Apache 28 Brave
Posts: 8,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tax_man View Post
I just read that Extreme Remarketing was registered owner of the boat. If so then the contract to sell is null and void as the Donger didn't own the boat. Contract is a fraudulent document and is null and void.
I was under the impression that Steve Thomas was dba "extreme remarketing."
Contract has other issues, but not as many as Mr. Thomas.
fund razor is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 02:55 PM
  #727
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monclova, Ohio
My Boats: Baja 25 Outlaw
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomer35 View Post
Why should he lose his deposite.

1) the boat was misrepresented and prostock had to find out about damages he was never told about through reading it and seeing pics on boatfreaks.

2) he attempted to pay in full monday, just one busness day after the contract expired

3) he was promised a survey by the seller and it never arrived, although he was told on numerous occasions by the seller it was on the way, or in the mail.

he should get all 14k back and then some

# 1 and 3 are what I am saying!! he should get the whole thing back. LDD broke the deal right there so no deposit should be lost
danh63 is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 03:04 PM
  #728
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
nordic95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
My Boats: 32' Fountain Fever
Posts: 1,838
Default

I just received word that both parties are no where close to the same number figures.LDD is still claiming that waiting till Monday to discuss the deal after he sent PS a email on Saturday asking PS to wait till Monday because of fathersday Sunday caused him to lose thousands of dollars.Even if PS would have paid him on Monday via a wire transfer he would still be out thousands(so LDD claims).So he wants PS to make up the difference of what he could have sold the boat for and what he claims he actually sold the boat months later.He just doesnt get it.Its up to PS from here but if it was me i'd be on the phone today with the attorney,enough is enough.

Anthony

Last edited by nordic95; 11-24-2008 at 04:17 PM.
nordic95 is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 03:05 PM
  #729
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danh63 View Post
# 1 and 3 are what I am saying!! he should get the whole thing back. LDD broke the deal right there so no deposit should be lost

If it was me personally I'd definetly give it all back! But since duck is not a person of character, there has to be some comprimise in order to end this nightmare and IMO only, that 2K should easily be the most comprimise Prostock should settle for.

Again a person of character would not think twice about refunding the whole 14K but this isn't what Prostock is dealing with.
ZP'd is offline  
Old 11-24-2008, 03:19 PM
  #730
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
My Boats: 1979 Formula 302, 99 Formula 353, 81 Donzi 18 2+3 with 454
Posts: 18,379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VtSteve View Post
Is that the same boat? Looks like the price is dropping
OLX seems to me to be the place that all the scammers hang out. I tried to contact a number of people selling stuff on that site and it was always a scam.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Closed Thread

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BOBCATMATHEWS
General Boating Discussion
20
09-08-2008 05:44 PM
dyno
General Boating Discussion
3
07-05-2003 03:05 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.