Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
get the hell out of my way >

get the hell out of my way

Notices
General Boating Discussion

get the hell out of my way

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:13 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI / Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by GO4BROKE
Bigger boat had the right of way, (and its the bigger boat!) but was too stubborn to avoid an accident. Smaller boat is unexplainable. Both are morons.
I'm in total agreement!!!...

I'm never too proud to give "right-of-way"...

Just hope that any persons lounging in the lower station/salon, were aware and had time to move/react...

Looks like a lot of head crashing on the bridge also...

Almost like a plane crash...It's not the fall that kills you...It's the sudden stop...(sic)

Divenstar
divenstar is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:16 AM
  #12  
RedDog382's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 1
From: Toledo, Ohio/Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by GO4BROKE
Bigger boat had the right of way, (and its the bigger boat!) but was too stubborn to avoid an accident. Smaller boat is unexplainable. Both are morons.
WRONG!!! According to both inland and international navigation rules, the smaller boat approaching from the R was the "stand on" vessel and clearly had the right of way. The larger vessel is the "give way" vessel and had the duty to alter course to avoid the collision. The video clearly indicates who is at fault. I would love to have access to it if I were the stand on vessel obviously going to court over the incident.

http://www.boatingbasicsonline.com/c...ing/6_2_b1.php

Last edited by RedDog382; 11-23-2008 at 10:19 AM.
RedDog382 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:18 AM
  #13  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by GO4BROKE
Bigger boat had the right of way, (and its the bigger boat!) but was too stubborn to avoid an accident. Smaller boat is unexplainable. Both are morons.
It's hard to tell the relative sizes, but the "bigger boat" was not a ferry or supertanker. The smaller vessel was approaching from the Starboard side, and had the right of way technically.

It was obvious to those on the deck of the larger boat, as well as the pilot on the smaller boat, that a collision was imminent. I'm assuming those would technically be the Lookouts on each vessel, as a Proper Lookout is required. In this instance, rules of right-away are secondary to avoiding collision. Both vessels should have made a pronounced, deliberate turn to starboard. Both skippers were culpable in this accident, which was obviously avoidable had either master observed any of the rules of navigation. Sadly, they observed none.

Too many boaters out there now drive to the plotter.
VtSteve is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:23 AM
  #14  
RedDog382's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 1
From: Toledo, Ohio/Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by VtSteve
In this instance, rules of right-away are secondary to avoiding collision.
Proper knowledge and adherance to navigation rules and rules of the road would have avoided this incident all together. Seems like a few people here need to take a basic refresher course ...
RedDog382 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:41 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Harrison, Oh/Lake Cumberland, Ky
Default

holy crap.
ImaPoser is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 03:23 PM
  #16  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by RedDog382
WRONG!!! According to both inland and international navigation rules, the smaller boat approaching from the R was the "stand on" vessel and clearly had the right of way. The larger vessel is the "give way" vessel and had the duty to alter course to avoid the collision. The video clearly indicates who is at fault. I would love to have access to it if I were the stand on vessel obviously going to court over the incident.

http://www.boatingbasicsonline.com/c...ing/6_2_b1.php
Your 100% correct. Hasn't anyone here taken a Coast Guard Course? Rules of the road apply. Stand on vessel has the right of way for what that is worth. Wonder why neither sounded a horn as a warning to the other.
Rik is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 05:47 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rik
Your 100% correct. Hasn't anyone here taken a Coast Guard Course? Rules of the road apply. Stand on vessel has the right of way for what that is worth. Wonder why neither sounded a horn as a warning to the other.
Beat me to it.
Hot Knots is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 09:39 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: miami,florida
Default

there both morons!!!
monzaspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2008 | 10:42 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton Florida
Default

Originally Posted by monzaspeed
there both morons!!!
100 % agree,,,,,,,,+ now they have both recked boats .

I just hope the women and children stayed ok, can care less about the idiots on bord of both vessels.
No horn no screaming all i heard was ,,,,,someone look at this ,,,,,,,,,booooom.

WOW, its got to be fun with a bunch of green and no brains.
DareDevil is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2008 | 08:28 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,NC & 1000 Islands,NY
Default

Large vessel was clearly the give way vessel; idiots had time to recognize a collision but not try to avoid it. Plus, how many people aboard both boats with their heads up their a55es!? Although one should be able to trust the Captain!
spilman is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.