Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Anyone ever use this cam 134571 >

Anyone ever use this cam 134571

Notices

Anyone ever use this cam 134571

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-08-2009, 10:33 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default Anyone ever use this cam 134571

Has anyone ever use this cam. I've always seen it around and looks OK with the exception of the higher duration. Just wondering???


Part Number: 134571 Grind Number: H-306-2 (REPLACES CCH-306-2)
Engine Identification:
Start Yr. End Yr. Make Cyl Description
1967 Up CHEVROLET 8 ROUGH IDLE, PERFORMANCE USAGE, GOOD UPPER RPM HP, BRACKET RACING, AUTO TRANS W/ 3500+ CONVERTER, MARINE PERFORMANCE, 4000-4400 CRUISE RPM, 10.5 TO 12.0 COMPRESSION RATIO ADVISED. BASIC RPM 3800-6800
Engine Size Configuration
396-454 C.I. V

Valve Setting: Intake .000 Exhaust .000 HOT

Lift: Intake @Cam 336 @Valve 571 All Lifts are based
on zero lash and theoretical rocker arm ratios.
Exhaust @ Cam 344 @Valve 585
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.70

Cam Timing: TAPPET @.0042
Lift: Opens Closes ADV Duration
Intake 44 BTDC 82 ABDC 306 °
Exhaust 92 BBDC 42 ATDC 314 °

Spring Requirements: Triple Dual Outer Inner
Part Number 99893
Loads Closed 130 LBS @ 1.850 or 1 27/32
Open 342 LBS @ 1.290
Recommended RPM range with matching components
Minimum RPM 3400
Maximum RPM 7000
Valve Float 7200

Cam Timing: TAPPET @.050
Lift: Opens Closes Max Lift Duration
Intake 16 BTDC 50 ABDC 107 246 °
Exhaust 64 BBDC 10 ATDC 117 254 °
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 10:50 PM
  #2  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

I'm not looking to run it just curious? It's only .5 more than the 561 and 741. 110 might be a little overkill but it would sure smell nice. I run that in all my muscle cars. Someone should make that into cologne. I would imagine you get plenty of wiffs of it also.

I'll call you tomorrow regarding the trans.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:35 AM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,215
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looks like a crane number. Maybe a little difficult getting that part...they've have been shutdown for awhile and may be up for auction. Some of the peeps are trying to bring it back but we'll see - I've got my fingers crossed for them.
fantastixvoyage is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 09:30 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default Crane

Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage
Looks like a crane number. Maybe a little difficult getting that part...they've have been shutdown for awhile and may be up for auction. Some of the peeps are trying to bring it back but we'll see - I've got my fingers crossed for them.
I hope something happens. I heard a rumor that comp was looking at buying their assets. It would be a shame to see them go all together as they have some great grinds.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 12:10 PM
  #5  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,555
Received 1,816 Likes on 904 Posts
Default

Thats a flat tappet cam and really can't be compared to 741 roller cam.

It is too big for a pleasure marine engine.
Griff is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 12:36 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Point Pleasant/Demarest NJ
Posts: 1,100
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Crane cams 139651 Hydraulic Roller
Pro1 is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:20 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
DORaymond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Scorpion was also looking at buying them, but the deal may have died.
DORaymond is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:48 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default cam

Originally Posted by Griff
Thats a flat tappet cam and really can't be compared to 741 roller cam.

It is too big for a pleasure marine engine.
I was only comparing cams as to their recommended comp. ratio. Also just wondering if anyone has ever run it.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:55 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,489 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro1
Crane cams 139651 Hydraulic Roller
How about this one? Might be a little on the large side for my 496's? I might be wrong though as I have hever run one. The lift don't bother me just the duration. Let me know Pro1 if you have any experience with it. I'll bet that thing would bark at an idle.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:31 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran the 139651 on a 540. Worked fine with a dry exhaust, had a rough idle, but was manageable and sounded good
tx911 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.