Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast... >

You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast...

Notices

You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast...

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-21-2009, 04:13 AM
  #41  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 69
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jassman
6 blade Herings 74.6mph
diameter and pitch or is that classified?
poddy is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 10:58 AM
  #42  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Catmando
I think you should take a look at turbines. John Arruda at www.turbinemarine,com put a pair of his 1450hp turbines in an 18,000lb 51' Outerlimits V bottom and it's running over 130 with Merc 6 drives. He has solved a lot of problems with turbines in the Marine environment, especially exhaust heat with water-jacketed exhaust. One problem with turbines is they burn as much fuel at idle as they do at WOT.

Eliminator boats built a 12,500lb 43' V with staggered 480hp Cummins-Mercruiser diesels that is running close to 75mph. If that boat(Scarab) had the Fountain bottom it would run well over 80.

One way to wring more speed out of a diesel is multispeed transmissions. Weismann has developed transmissions from two to six speeds and they have also developed a Marine drive to handle the huge torque;

www.weismann.net

The latest out of my shop.
50' 9'6" beam 15,000 Ibs 130Mph at 200 gal per hr fuel burn. (28 gal per hr at iddle)
The boat is very quite (83Db), and has minimal heat signature as the exhaust is under water.
The boat is available for demo if needed. (And thank you catmando for the plug)
Attached Thumbnails You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast...-081.jpg   You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast...-077.jpg   You're the experts - Suggestions on Diesel Go-Fast...-075.jpg  


Last edited by J Arruda; 07-21-2009 at 06:29 PM.
J Arruda is offline  
Old 07-21-2009, 10:50 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 524
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Team Taboo, the gears in that boat were from Twin Disc as you know. The mechanical shift on those gears didn't have a stop. ZF gears don't have that issue.

Blacklabmarine.. The company I work for built 3, 50' center console target drones for the Navy last year, and I will be doing 4 more this year. All 3 boats last year had Yanmar 480's with Arneson ASD8's. We were running twins in the hull and the last boat ran 67 mph full of fuel. however believe these hulls were in the 12-13k lb range rigged minus fuel. I verify that weight for you.

The boats we will be doing this year will have some minor changes and corrections in the mold that should put these boats over 70 mph.

We have been supplying the yanmar engines to nortec and so far cummins hasn't been able to touch the performance of our 480s.

I would say to put 3 480 asd 8 packages in that hull. As rick and joe pointed out, manuverability with the surface drives is just fine. I would stay away from Bmax or Konrad drives. They won't stay together behind the 440 or 480 yanmars.

Last edited by obrien; 07-21-2009 at 10:56 PM.
obrien is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 07:36 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumors of my demise were BS

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
29firefox - nice to hear from you again

I know what cable play is but have to say never, never, never seen that do any damage. You know we ran Fabio's boats and our own. The biggest thing was - keep everything mechanical no electric or hydraulic controls/systems unless there was no other option. Granted electronics have evolved over the last 20 years and today are more reilable than a mechanical connection.

But it seems to me and I'm not wanting to fight with people on this but cable play on a little 40' boat with straight runs to the engine room is poor installation more than anything.
It's also a matter of evolution of the engines & gear boxes too. Some packages just don't have any levers on em anywhere to hook up a morse cable to
Some markets demand morse cable hook up. Komatsu went so far as to design their electronically controlled engines to use a morse cable. Yup the morse cable comes down to engine room and hook up to a lever on the side of the ECM box
My previous post I mentioned tunable shift lag and multi harness routing but I forgot to mention was synchronization or "Single lever Throttle control" One of my proudest moments of red neck engineering was when I used two Glendining boxes to daisy chain a set of triple 16V92s so they could do the single lever thang
You also hit the nail on the head. Most cable problems are from chitty installation.
Also for the koolaid drinkers that toot Yanmar's flute. I live and work in Yanmar's homeland and when ever a customer goes Komatsu they never go back. :cuqui:
.................................................. ...................................yanmar

Last edited by 29Firefox; 07-22-2009 at 07:40 AM.
29Firefox is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 09:24 AM
  #45  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 524
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 29Firefox
It's also a matter of evolution of the engines & gear boxes too. Some packages just don't have any levers on em anywhere to hook up a morse cable to
Some markets demand morse cable hook up. Komatsu went so far as to design their electronically controlled engines to use a morse cable. Yup the morse cable comes down to engine room and hook up to a lever on the side of the ECM box
My previous post I mentioned tunable shift lag and multi harness routing but I forgot to mention was synchronization or "Single lever Throttle control" One of my proudest moments of red neck engineering was when I used two Glendining boxes to daisy chain a set of triple 16V92s so they could do the single lever thang
You also hit the nail on the head. Most cable problems are from chitty installation.
Also for the koolaid drinkers that toot Yanmar's flute. I live and work in Yanmar's homeland and when ever a customer goes Komatsu they never go back. :cuqui:
.................................................. ...................................yanmar

You may not like them, but they have their place. There must be a good reason why almost every nortec diesel boat has them.
obrien is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 09:41 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just some basics

This is from real world experience. Ya all are looking at engines that are too small. To get rock solid performance in the 50 knot and over patrol boat range you need at least a horsepower total of 1500 ponies or better. The gold standard in the real world is the 1000 hp Man. The Man will out perform the Cat & Komatsu engines on top end but Cat & Komatsu can out cruise Man and the Cat would out top end the Komatsu but the Komatsu will out cruise the Cat. Running gun battles take place at cruise speed not at top end. Fabio helped design the Seateks but when it came time to power his own boats he put Cat C-15s in em. The Seateks will out top end the Cats but the Cats will out cruise the Seateks. Reliability & the ability to have good "heat balance" over time. Those things are what close the deal. Don't get tunnel vision an which will give you the highest top end unless it can hold the output for at least 8 hours straight.
29Firefox is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 09:48 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by obrien
You may not like them, but they have their place. There must be a good reason why almost every nortec diesel boat has them.
Yanmar has the best damn salesmen
29Firefox is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 01:31 PM
  #48  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by poddy
diameter and pitch or is that classified?

18 x 31 classified..LOL
Jassman is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 01:49 PM
  #49  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,396
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 29Firefox
This is from real world experience. Ya all are looking at engines that are too small. To get rock solid performance in the 50 knot and over patrol boat range you need at least a horsepower total of 1500 ponies or better. The gold standard in the real world is the 1000 hp Man. The Man will out perform the Cat & Komatsu engines on top end but Cat & Komatsu can out cruise Man and the Cat would out top end the Komatsu but the Komatsu will out cruise the Cat. Running gun battles take place at cruise speed not at top end. Fabio helped design the Seateks but when it came time to power his own boats he put Cat C-15s in em. The Seateks will out top end the Cats but the Cats will out cruise the Seateks. Reliability & the ability to have good "heat balance" over time. Those things are what close the deal. Don't get tunnel vision an which will give you the highest top end unless it can hold the output for at least 8 hours straight.
Part of what you are saying is true..but factor in weight/size to power/torque ratio and the Yanmar just works....physics... and it works reliably on numerous Nor-Tech boats...that is why they use them....call backs in the marine or any business need to be at a minimum. My 43 Nor-tech weight is more than Jays new boat and the boat hit 74.6. This is not a hi tech bottom either with multiple steps..The same set up in Adib Mastry's 39 Nor-Tech boat..(owner of Yanmar in Sarasota)...did 80 gps and I believe high 81's on radar. My deal is.. if it aint broke..leave it the heck alone.. heres a video of that Yanmar boat..click the silver boat w/red strip..39 11,000. Nor-Tech

http://www.nor-techboats.com/videos.php
Jassman is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 02:39 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by J Arruda
The latest out of my shop.
50' 9'6" beam 15,000 Ibs 130Mph at 200 gal per hr fuel burn. (28 gal per hr at iddle)
The boat is very quite (83Db), and has minimal heat signature as the exhaust is under water.
The boat is available for demo if needed. (And thank you catmando for the plug)
Ok now here's a rumor that has been debunked; I said turbines burn as much fuel at idle as at WOT. Thank you John for setting me straight.

Do you still have Warbird? I watch the youtube videos all the time. My favorite Nor-Tech. And what about Ken Cook's Hydrofoil? Has he delivered the boat yet?
Catmando is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.