Notices

Whipple 1075sci upgrade

Old 04-17-2010, 06:18 AM
  #11  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
offshoredrillin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,190
Received 1,295 Likes on 449 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
After further testing, 150hp with 91-octane, 175hp on 93 octane. 75lbs of torque increase. EGT'2 50deg cooler, air fuel per cylinder .25 from high to low (factory has #8 1 full air fuel ratio leaner), egt's 50deg from high to low.
thats awesome, so in theory one could take their own long blocks and purchase everything from you and get a set of 1075 comps and be a very happy camper with an engine comparable to a 1075 but with some advantages... i like that idea.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:15 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Casa De Kappy
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
Thought you guys would want to see our new upgrade for the 1075sci. Replaces the stock 2.3L dual superchargers with dual 2.9L superchargers.



Comment:

This may be an over simplified question but why not just eliminate both superchargers and place a 8.3 unit on the same engine modify the pulley system and get 8.3 litres of sc power in a single unit.

Easier tuning and management etc...

The 2.9 plus 2.9 do not exceed the volume of your 8.3 unit. The only reason I can think of is pulley changes would be too difficult and customer wanting to retain the dual sc aspect of the engine ie...for re-sale.

Can you elaborate on the rationale.

Thanks,

KAP
kap328 is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:57 AM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riggs
Any of this translate to the 850 sci? Looked at doing stage 1 for the 80lbs and 6,500 but curious what else your cooking up?
Cam, springs, belt and pulleys and we can take you to 1100hp. Add our new SC's and your pushing over 1200hp.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 12:07 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kap328
Comment:

This may be an over simplified question but why not just eliminate both superchargers and place a 8.3 unit on the same engine modify the pulley system and get 8.3 litres of sc power in a single unit.

Easier tuning and management etc...

The 2.9 plus 2.9 do not exceed the volume of your 8.3 unit. The only reason I can think of is pulley changes would be too difficult and customer wanting to retain the dual sc aspect of the engine ie...for re-sale.

Can you elaborate on the rationale.

Thanks,

KAP
The belt system is too difficult to get right. Can't run the 8.3L on 12-rib. Also height and just overall packaging was incredibly tough. I did look at it.

These SC's are upgraded in many ways as well so they can give boaters far more trouble free operation.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 01:36 PM
  #15  
PF Marine
Platinum Member
 
Coolerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,787
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Nice work dustin!

Also, regarding the question about the 8.3 blower....... Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 8.3 blower is the same as the 5.0, just having the opposite rotor driven?
Coolerman is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 02:59 PM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by saxman
Nice work dustin!

Also, regarding the question about the 8.3 blower....... Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 8.3 blower is the same as the 5.0, just having the opposite rotor driven?
Yes, exactly.
Whipple Charged is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 04:42 PM
  #17  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
offshoredrillin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,190
Received 1,295 Likes on 449 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
Yes, exactly.
what would you estimate hp on a set up like this. 509CI, AFR 325 heads 8.8/1 compression, 525 style cam with 8.1 firing order with either your 4.0 and a moac cooler, or this new dual set up...on pump gas, and your opinion on the reliability of it?
offshoredrillin is offline  
Old 04-17-2010, 11:20 PM
  #18  
Chris
Gold Member
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Dustin just did one like you described... 1023 hp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8k8_...eature=related

and my Whipple modified 600sci... 502 cu/inch .. ported stock heads .. closed cooled .. 960 hp

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl8M-AI-ZrM

Chris

Last edited by CB-BLR; 04-17-2010 at 11:25 PM.
CB-BLR is offline  
Old 04-18-2010, 09:17 AM
  #19  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
offshoredrillin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 12,190
Received 1,295 Likes on 449 Posts
Default

very cool, great job on both of them dustin, thanks for your threads Chris, gives me plenty to think about. and both of those are on pump gas 91/93?
offshoredrillin is offline  
Old 04-18-2010, 02:47 PM
  #20  
Chris
Gold Member
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Both on 91 pump gas

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.