Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Oil spill in the gulf of Mexico >

Oil spill in the gulf of Mexico

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Oil spill in the gulf of Mexico

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:07 AM
  #311  
Expensive Date's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 1
From: West Creek NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
They have done this before? Where?
I will try to find the article and post later.
Expensive Date is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:14 AM
  #312  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Grand Lake (E-Dock Junior Varsity)
Default

Bombs work for blowing out well head fires but not not underwater leaks, right? How would it seal it off?? Unless it somehow kinked the head or something. And its a cement lined casing.. Not sure how all that would work, but Im not a bomb technician, lol
waterboy222 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:18 AM
  #313  
88Fount33's Avatar
Beak botr
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral
Default

small nuke set off 5,000 feet down...I would guess that for it to be significant enough to shatter rock down several thousand feet to pinch off the oil/gas flow it would vaporize the water column above it in about a 200 yard wide tunnel to the surface. then with the rush of water back into the hole can you say...Surf's Up in the gulf with 30 ft waves? Let me get inland 10 miles first, please. The Operations Crossroads Baker was set off about 95 ft below a ship in a lagoon. You can easily see the crater from Google earth (about 15 Mt blast). The video is the one where you see the ship ride up the water plume and the ship looks tiny on the side of the plume.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zVBhetpDEYo&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_ US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zVBhetpDEYo&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_ US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Attached Thumbnails Oil spill in the gulf of Mexico-800px-operation_crossroads_baker_edit.jpg  

Last edited by 88Fount33; 05-14-2010 at 11:34 AM. Reason: Correct Nuke shot name to correct one
88Fount33 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:27 AM
  #314  
jayboat's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,696
Likes: 201
From: North Carolina
Default

Just watched President Obama's speech about this. Man, it feels good to hear him call out BP, Halliburton and TransOcean for the 'ridiculous spectacle' they put on the other day.

If any good comes of this, it will be some renewed energy focused on environmental regulations in general and oil drilling, offshore and otherwise, in particular.
__________________
Roostertail does not lie.

NAPLES IMAGE Photo Galleries
jayboat is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:38 AM
  #315  
Bullhead's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 93
From: Smithfield, VA
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5SxX2EntEo
Bullhead is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 11:47 AM
  #316  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bullhead
Have these idiot hillbillies done the math on how much hay it would take to soak up all that oil, their using a 1/4 pound hay for about 7oz of oil, this leak is around 50,000 Barrels a day. then you still need to collect all the hay and do something with it, now youhave bio hazard hay
TampaBeach is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 12:48 PM
  #317  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Grand Lake (E-Dock Junior Varsity)
Default

Soviet Union advising us to use Nukes sounds about like a guy at prom prodding his date to ignore the fizzy pill in the bottom of her punch glass...

Im very skeptical as to the use of nukes to "pinch off" the well head.. Ill have to do some research but I believe the oil cavity is very VERY shallow to the ocean floor. Caving in the ceiling of the cavity doesnt sound like the worlds best plan by ANY MEANS..

Take from Christian Science Monitor...

And just because some russian type editor said we should, shouldnt even get half a nod.. lol


Weapons labs in the former Soviet Union developed special nukes for use to help pinch off the gas wells. They believed that the force from a nuclear explosion could squeeze shut any hole within 82 to 164 feet (25 to 50 meters), depending on the explosion's power. That required drilling holes to place the nuclear device close to the target wells.

IN PICTURES: Louisiana oil spill

A first test in the fall of 1966 proved successful in sealing up an underground gas well in southern Uzbekistan, and so the Russians used nukes four more times for capping runaway wells.

"The second 'success' gave Soviet scientists great confidence in the use of this new technique for rapidly and effectively controlling ran away gas and oil wells," according to a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) report on the Soviet Union's peaceful uses of nuclear explosions.

A last attempt took place in 1981, but failed perhaps because of poor positioning, according to a U.S. Department of Energy report.

Komsomoloskaya Pravda suggested that the United States might as well take a chance with a nuke, based on the historical 20-percent failure rate. Still, the Soviet experience with nuking underground gas wells could prove easier in retrospect than trying to seal the Gulf of Mexico’s oil well disaster that's taking place 5,000 feet below the surface.

The Russians were using nukes to extinguish gas well fires in natural gas fields, not sealing oil wells gushing liquid, so there are big differences, and this method has never been tested in such conditions.

Besides the possibility of failure, there are always risks when dealing with radiation, though material from the DOE report suggests these are minimal since the radiation would be far underground.
waterboy222 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 12:52 PM
  #318  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Grand Lake (E-Dock Junior Varsity)
Default

Originally Posted by Bullhead
4"-6" Deep of straw across 4000 sq miles?

"Boys, fire up the John Deere"

The straw needs to be used along the shoreline booms to absorb anything that splashes over the booms.. But how do you "collect" 56million tons of oil soaked straw and "incinerate" it.. I wouldnt wanna be around for THAT bonfire
waterboy222 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 01:38 PM
  #319  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by Bullhead
It would never happen unless BP owned the hay..
apache727 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-2010 | 01:45 PM
  #320  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,008
Likes: 1,088
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Originally Posted by jayboat
If any good comes of this, it will be some renewed energy focused on environmental regulations in general and oil drilling, offshore and otherwise, in particular.
In other words...higher gas and oil prices. My concern is that the wack job politicians are already coming out against offshore drilling, as if we have an alternative. More punishment of the American population.
Indy is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.