Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Mercury Racing Introduces 1100 >

Mercury Racing Introduces 1100

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Mercury Racing Introduces 1100

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-18-2011 | 06:19 AM
  #41  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,315
Likes: 1,557
From: Maryland
Default

I agree with both Dustin and Cat on this. its a shame the economy is the way it is because so much good technology is here and on the horizon. I would also agree that the supercharger an turbo charger is fast becoming moot as both will have their place and big hp motors will be all over with 250 to 300 hour rebuild times and run on pump gas. it's exciting to see, i know of a company now that will be bringing a 1500 hp pump gas motor to market in a few months with quad Whipple 4.0's.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 02-18-2011 | 07:29 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Default

I am thinking this gives me a green light to up the power on my 700sc's to at least 900 to 1000hp since Merc is offering the NXT with 1100hp from the factory.
ElimiNordic is offline  
Reply
Old 02-18-2011 | 10:48 AM
  #43  
Thread Starter
Correspondent
Community Builder
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
Correspondent
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,733
Likes: 4,332
Default

Originally Posted by iamjoe
Yeah, no kidding........ I can tell you that I would be discouraged for sure; spend that kind of coin on something thats obsolete. Geez, its not like you're buying a TV or computer!

I always thought turbo's generated a sh#tlo*d of heat. Are the new vent designs capable of shedding the kind of heat those turbos must generate? Cooled turbos maybe?
I understand what you're saying, but I wouldn't call at 1075SCi or 1025/1200 "obsolete." I would say, however, they are not at the cutting of what Mercury Racing is doing, nor do they figure one bit in the company's future plans.

I've read this entire thread and there are so many valid points, especially from Dustin. Also, someone said this opens up the supercharging market to low-volume custom engine builders. I agree—at least if their production volume is such that EPA compliance is not required.
Matt Trulio is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 09:09 AM
  #44  
DONZI's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
From: BRIDGEWATER MA.
Default

Here's Fred on them-
http://www.youtube.com/mercuryracing#p/f/6/tjSo8rDnYmQ
Lock up the Women & Children !
Turbo's are taking over the world !

Last edited by DONZI; 02-19-2011 at 09:14 AM.
DONZI is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 10:17 AM
  #45  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 826
Likes: 56
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Default

I'm not an engine builder by any definition of the word, nor am I an engineer, or even smart enough to fully understand the finer points of valve train geometry, etc.... however... I think pushrod motors as a whole are old tech, borderline archaic.

The real development here for me is the pioneering of a DOHC head that works in the marine industry. Our world is sustained high RPMs.... taking a good number of the moving parts out of the equation is a no brainer.

I've always been hopeful that someone would develop a retrofit for BBCs that would use DOHCs... and WORK. Everytime I push my boat hard I can't help but think of what's going on inside of a head.

Just my 2 cents.
Jpzaluski is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 10:54 AM
  #46  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by ElimiNordic
I am thinking this gives me a green light to up the power on my 700sc's to at least 900 to 1000hp since Merc is offering the NXT with 1100hp from the factory.
Be careful, I think the transmission is the weak link when updating the 700/NXT package. Been a lot of posts about it on here.
jmeng is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 10:57 AM
  #47  
Thread Starter
Correspondent
Community Builder
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
Correspondent
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,733
Likes: 4,332
Default

Originally Posted by jmeng
Be careful, I think the transmission is the weak link when updating the 700/NXT package. Been a lot of posts about it on here.
That is correct. I have been told many times by people at Mercury Racing, namely Fred Kiekhaefer, that a standard NXT drive is good to 700 hp—and that's it.

If you upgrade your 700, you need a beefier drive than a standard NXT.
Matt Trulio is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 12:33 PM
  #48  
dkwestern's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Lake St. Clair
Default

Originally Posted by ElimiNordic
I am thinking this gives me a green light to up the power on my 700sc's to at least 900 to 1000hp since Merc is offering the NXT with 1100hp from the factory.
It's only the NXT Transom assembly. The Trans is the M8, and the drive is a #6. It's a hybrid of all 3 drives.
dkwestern is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 12:53 PM
  #49  
dkwestern's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Lake St. Clair
Default

Does this 1100 simply have less boost than the 1350? Max RPM is identical, along with everything else other than a single throttle body vs 2 on the 1350, and calibration.

So does it just pack less air in and make less power?

Would it last longer (reliability) before rebuilds even though they both spin 6500 RPM?

I'm just wondering what the advantage is over the 1350 besides 89 octane and slightly less initial cost?
dkwestern is offline  
Reply
Old 02-19-2011 | 05:59 PM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Default

I went by and saw the 1100 today and talked to them about power upgrades. I still like the blower on the 700sc and I love sound of two blowers much better than a hair dryer. That Indy drive sure looks beefy on a stand sitting there with that BIG motor. Pretty impressive. Any body now why they took three different drives and combined them on the 1100 instead of just using the #6. Too much torque?
ElimiNordic is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.