![]() |
Great price on an OL?
I think this is a great price on a 51 Outerlimits, don't you?
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o32836-en.html |
Thats a great price for a 51!!!
|
How can they keep XR's under that thing? With 5 blades no less. Lord help us!
|
Thats a bad mo-fo! Not a fan of trips though.
Whats the speed on that Dan? |
The boat runs right around 100mph. You have to remember even though it has XR's it is not a real heavy boat for a 51 being epoxy. Whats nice with the trips is you can always get home no matter where you are.
|
that thing must melt xr's, thats still a 14-15,ooo lb boat
|
Originally Posted by kellyshooty
(Post 3430317)
that thing must melt xr's, thats still a 14-15,ooo lb boat
|
seems like a decent price just check it out and make sure its ok.
:op: |
no thanks on the bravo's...any boat over 38 ft shouldnt have bravos on it IMO.
|
Man that's a big bastard!
|
Great boat with a Great $. Just a sign of the times, especially if you were to try to finance the boat, you can FORGET it. No one is loaning any $$ for High-Perf. boats, I know and you can ask Dave P. also!
|
When I lived in NJ I did a lot of boating with the owner. We ran the ocean a lot together and never any drive issues. He took delivery of a new 52' so this one's gonna go.
|
Originally Posted by kellyshooty
(Post 3430317)
that thing must melt xr's, thats still a 14-15,ooo lb boat
If someone had the coin, picking this boat up for a song and replacing the bravos with Arneson's might be a hell of a bang for the buck and one fast and sick ride!!! :cool: |
Originally Posted by Panther
(Post 3430461)
When I lived in NJ I did a lot of boating with the owner. We ran the ocean a lot together and never any drive issues. He took delivery of a new 52' so this one's gonna go.
|
Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2
(Post 3430477)
betchya he didnt get bravos again...
|
to big and to exspensive for me. Looks cool no doubt but even if I had the money think I would go no bigger than 42, 51ft equals a pain to tow it and you need a captains license I beleive
|
Originally Posted by Fountain4402
(Post 3430488)
to big and to exspensive for me. Looks cool no doubt but even if I had the money think I would go no bigger than 42, 51ft equals a pain to tow it and you need a captains license I beleive
|
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3430299)
Thats a bad mo-fo! Not a fan of trips though.
That 51 is a killer deal! I'd love to have it ! ! ! ! What else does a guy with a 47 move up to?! :evilb: |
Originally Posted by eddie
(Post 3430495)
What's wrong with triples? I'm on my second and after all the hype against them, I don't get it. Our boat has XZ's and I've' never had a drive issue with 500 EFI's behind them either.
That 51 is a killer deal! I'd love to have it ! ! ! ! What else does a guy with a 47 move up to?! :evilb: |
Originally Posted by Panther
(Post 3430461)
When I lived in NJ I did a lot of boating with the owner. We ran the ocean a lot together and never any drive issues. He took delivery of a new 52' so this one's gonna go.
|
What is the actual weight of an epoxy 51 with trip 600's and bravo's?
|
Originally Posted by eddie
(Post 3430495)
What's wrong with triples? I'm on my second and after all the hype against them, I don't get it.
|
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3430479)
I'm amazed they'd even sell an OL with bravos! :D
|
Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
(Post 3430508)
What is the actual weight of an epoxy 51 with trip 600's and bravo's?
|
Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2
(Post 3430575)
X2...
|
Originally Posted by OL40SVX
(Post 3430577)
Approx 11,500lbs. On the triple comment with proper hull design and proper wight distribution different things can be achieved speed being one of them. A newer 52SL with staggered 1075's runs conservativley 120mph and the triple version conservativly 135mph. Both full caboin loaded to the top boats.
http://www.outerlimitspowerboats.com/46Limited.htm |
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3430531)
For me the means doesn't justify the end...More fuel, more maintanence on an extra motor and a drive, more weight, more room needed and the gain in speed isn't very much.
I wouldn't mind having a tripple 600 boat of this size (I think it makes a lot of sense), but I'd want Arnesons! |
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3430592)
While I've always agreed with what you're saying, to a certain degree the lower maintenance intervals and problems associated with smaller power might offset that of the increased issues with two engines with 'big power'.
I wouldn't mind having a tripple 600 boat of this size (I think it makes a lot of sense), but I'd want Arnesons! Of course, no offense meant to this boat...I can only dream of owning such a master piece and "wouldn't kick it out of bed" if I had a shot at it.:drink: |
Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2
(Post 3430586)
im not questioning your information but when i look up an epoxy hull 46 limited on outerlimits website it lists a weight of 12k lbs. how does a 51 with more hardware (extra drive and engine) get lighter?
http://www.outerlimitspowerboats.com/46Limited.htm |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by SS930
(Post 3430592)
While I've always agreed with what you're saying, to a certain degree the lower maintenance intervals and problems associated with smaller power might offset that of the increased issues with two engines with 'big power'.
I wouldn't mind having a tripple 600 boat of this size (I think it makes a lot of sense), but I'd want Arnesons! I'd be happy with the bravo boat with 600 SCi's. I’m easy on the throttles out of the hole and don’t run the boat WFO very often. I just did oil changes on the 500 EFI's a week ago and it's not that big of a deal to do an extra motor when I'm already in there doing it. Drive service I did over the winter and bought the gear lube by the five gallon bucket. I’d bet I filled up the drives faster with the bucket than most people with six bottles and the plastic pump. The winterization was harder due to the generator, AC, fresh water, hot water heater, two sinks and vacuflush. I like to do my work myself and when I have questions get help from a certified mechanic. I guess in our area that’s what’s nice, help isn’t very far away. I can't get away from the added expense of the parts for the extra motor. It is what it is. The cruise and idle speeds are very nice. :drink: |
Originally Posted by Fountain4402
(Post 3430488)
to big and to exspensive for me. Looks cool no doubt but even if I had the money think I would go no bigger than 42, 51ft equals a pain to tow it and you need a captains license I beleive
I really hope you're kidding....don't post things like this, then some bonehead will legitimately think you need a captains license to own one... Captains License is for charters and business operators ie if people are paying you to take them out. It really has nothing to do the size of the boat..More of a liability thing... |
Originally Posted by eddie
(Post 3430715)
I'd be happy with the bravo boat with 600 SCi's. I’m easy on the throttles out of the hole and don’t run the boat WFO very often.
I just did oil changes on the 500 EFI's a week ago and it's not that big of a deal to do an extra motor when I'm already in there doing it. Drive service I did over the winter and bought the gear lube by the five gallon bucket. I’d bet I filled up the drives faster with the bucket than most people with six bottles and the plastic pump. The winterization was harder due to the generator, AC, fresh water, hot water heater, two sinks and vacuflush. I like to do my work myself and when I have questions get help from a certified mechanic. I guess in our area that’s what’s nice, help isn’t very far away. I can't get away from the added expense of the parts for the extra motor. It is what it is. The cruise and idle speeds are very nice. :drink: |
Originally Posted by 2fast9tech2
(Post 3430477)
betchya he didnt get bravos again...
|
Originally Posted by Fountain4402
(Post 3430488)
to big and to exspensive for me. Looks cool no doubt but even if I had the money think I would go no bigger than 42, 51ft equals a pain to tow it and you need a captains license I beleive
For me - I'd take a 50 footer in a heartbeat and wouldn't think twice about towing it. It is only 16 feet longer than what I have now - that is barely the length of my living room; I say grip it and rip it....!!!:evilb: I have to back the Cafe all the way down my street already, so what is the difference!!! |
Originally Posted by NJgr8ful
(Post 3430505)
Hey Frank ... That's Saks old 51'?? Nice boat for sure and nicely redone with 600's :cool:
Originally Posted by thisistank
(Post 3430531)
For me the means doesn't justify the end...More fuel, more maintanence on an extra motor and a drive, more weight, more room needed and the gain in speed isn't very much.
The current owner refreshed the engines a few seasons ago and averages 100hrs per season of trouble free boating every weekend. They didn't need it but that's just how he rolls. He boats a lot more than I do. :drink:
Originally Posted by OL40SVX
(Post 3430717)
Time to sell that Fountain Eddie and step up!:D
|
Originally Posted by eddie
(Post 3430715)
I'd be happy with the bravo boat with 600 SCi's. I’m easy on the throttles out of the hole and don’t run the boat WFO very often.
I just did oil changes on the 500 EFI's a week ago and it's not that big of a deal to do an extra motor when I'm already in there doing it. Drive service I did over the winter and bought the gear lube by the five gallon bucket. I’d bet I filled up the drives faster with the bucket than most people with six bottles and the plastic pump. The winterization was harder due to the generator, AC, fresh water, hot water heater, two sinks and vacuflush. I like to do my work myself and when I have questions get help from a certified mechanic. I guess in our area that’s what’s nice, help isn’t very far away. I can't get away from the added expense of the parts for the extra motor. It is what it is. The cruise and idle speeds are very nice. :drink: |
Originally Posted by 45Tripps
(Post 3430777)
You have to be comfortable with it all: Towing, Fuel, Maintainence, etc....
OL Dan said this 51' weighs in at 11,500 with the gooseneck I think it would pull better than my 47 off the hitch. |
Originally Posted by Fountain4402
(Post 3430488)
to big and to exspensive for me. Looks cool no doubt but even if I had the money think I would go no bigger than 42, 51ft equals a pain to tow it and you need a captains license I beleive
|
Originally Posted by madhatter42
(Post 3430716)
I really hope you're kidding....don't post things like this, then some bonehead will legitimately think you need a captains license to own one...
Captains License is for charters and business operators ie if people are paying you to take them out. It really has nothing to do the size of the boat..More of a liability thing... Cool boat, but I just dont see what I would so with 50ft i have almost 30 now and unless I was on open open water doesnt really make sense |
Originally Posted by eddie
(Post 3430821)
I should add I trailer the 47 EVERY weekend. I'm not very far from the ramp, but the only problem is finding my way back into traffic from the gas station. It's not like I can punch it and just get back up to 45 mph again. I back the boat in and my wife parks the truck and trailer 97% of the time. You should see the look on the fishing boat guys faces when Kathy jumps out of the drivers seat! We have high speed pick ups on the AC and Gen nothing like running the AC down the main channel at 80 on a Saturday afternoon. :evilb:
OL Dan said this 51' weighs in at 11,500 with the gooseneck I think it would pull better than my 47 off the hitch. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.