Notices
General Boating Discussion

Single vs Twin engines

Old 07-27-2011 | 05:15 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: The ATX
Default Single vs Twin engines

I am looking at getting back into boating. I used to have a Scarab with a 350. First off I will be only doing freshwater on the highland lakes in central Texas(Travis and sometimes Canyon Lake). Aside from some obvious benefits of a twin(extra engine if one goes down, more power, easier finesse turning around the dock) what other benefits am I looking at? Also, the downsides(twice the gas, maintenance and weight). I am looking at another go fast but also a cabin cruiser, neither over 30 ft. Any input would be appreciated.
rexmitchell is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2011 | 05:23 PM
  #2  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,210
Likes: 1,603
From: Worldwide
Default

Hate to have to do this, but use the search function.

This topic has been discussed at nauseam.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2011 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: The ATX
Default

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
Hate to have to do this, but use the search function.

This topic has been discussed at nauseam.
As awesome as the search functions are on forums, I searched around but didn't come up with alot of info
rexmitchell is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2011 | 05:33 PM
  #4  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,210
Likes: 1,603
From: Worldwide
Default

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/p...gle-twins.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...ns-single.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...ns-single.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...uel-usage.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...intenance.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...big-block.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...mall-twin.html

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/p...ns-single.html
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2011 | 05:34 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: The ATX
Default

Thank you
rexmitchell is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2011 | 08:17 PM
  #6  
97FASTech's Avatar
VIP Member
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 44
From: Canyon Lake/ Houston, TX
Default

Let me know when your at Canyon Lake, I boat there.
97FASTech is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-2011 | 09:52 AM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 358
From: Mansfield, TX
Default

I think the maintenance issue is a catch 22. Obviously its less to maintain two than one, but on a heavy 28ft boat the cost can be less overtime to maintain two motors. A heavy single engine 28ft boat will go thru motors and drives much faster than a twin. In the long run I think you may find it cost more to maintain a single high performance 500hp+ motor and drives than twin stock 415hp 502's or 365-385hp 454's on a heavy 28ft boat. In short, assuming a single engine 28ft boat has 500hp+ it will have shorter rebuild time and cost just as much to refurbish than a twin engine stock setup. Gas on a single vs twin is about 25-33% less, not the 50% you might expect.

Balance is also a catch 22. The torque steer of a single engine sucks much worse than a heavy rear ended twin setup IMO.

There really is no free lunch with either setup on a big heavy 28ft + boat.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-2011 | 10:38 AM
  #8  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: Toronto Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
I think the maintenance issue is a catch 22. Obviously its less to maintain two than one, but on a heavy 28ft boat the cost can be less overtime to maintain two motors. A heavy single engine 28ft boat will go thru motors and drives much faster than a twin. In the long run I think you may find it cost more to maintain a single high performance 500hp+ motor and drives than twin stock 415hp 502's or 365-385hp 454's on a heavy 28ft boat. In short, assuming a single engine 28ft boat has 500hp+ it will have shorter rebuild time and cost just as much to refurbish than a twin engine stock setup. Gas on a single vs twin is about 25-33% less, not the 50% you might expect.

Balance is also a catch 22. The torque steer of a single engine sucks much worse than a heavy rear ended twin setup IMO.

There really is no free lunch with either setup on a big heavy 28ft + boat.
good post.

Also, if you break down with one engine you are being towed. That can get old. On smaller lakes not a big deal but in big water lakes/ocean different story.

I run a 28 single with 675HP and an IMCO drive.
ar15meister is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-2011 | 10:44 AM
  #9  
Indy's Avatar
Member #154
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,002
Likes: 1,078
From: SW CT & Long Island Sound
Default

Depends also on the age/condition of your motors. Older motors and drives will break your bank. After having both I'd never to back to a single, I will however make sure that my next boat is newer with low hour/age motors.
Indy is offline  
Reply
Old 07-28-2011 | 02:34 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
From: Boca/Brentwood
Default

p:Single not get home twin get home
PARADISE ISLAND is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.