![]() |
Awesome shots Nikon, what body/lens were you shooting with?
|
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/265660-cockpit-construc
Moved my response to the Cockpit construction thread.
|
WOW ! Awesome that Danny will be OK & great pics Nikon:drink:
ITS A SKATER NATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:coolcowboy: |
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3549797)
Carl, the bodies were still warm when you started your rant, the event is over now... besides, my question revolves around the windshield integrity not the canopy construciton itself..
I stand by what I said AT THAT TIME |
|
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3549481)
nobody has addressed the fact that in all instances the plexi/lexan/whatever/ windscreens imploded on impact,,, the resulting incoming water pressure and volume THEN tore the canopy away from the supports
you don't see aircraft windshields doing this when they hit rain at 400-500 mph.... which begs the question, what thickness or mil rating is the clear glass/plastic/lexan/whatever? But yes, it should definitely be in one piece after that "little" incident. |
Originally Posted by Fredrik Z
(Post 3550086)
looking at the pic i think its a little more than rain.
But yes, it should definitely be in one piece after that "little" incident. I have seen bird's enter helicopter cockpits at low velocity though... I guess my basic simple question is > does the current offshore sanction bodies have a windscreen spec for thickness/composition/material for open or enclosed cockpits? |
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3550107)
I guess my basic simple question is > does the current offshore sanction bodies have a windscreen spec for thickness/composition/material for open or enclosed cockpits?
|
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3550107)
I spent several years as an aircraft mechanic at MIA, and worked flightline damage repairs daily, and 3 or 4 direct runway crashes, I never saw a windscreen that *tore* away like these did, we did have heavy hail and bird damage, but not a *tear* situation...
I have seen bird's enter helicopter cockpits at low velocity though... I guess my basic simple question is > does the current offshore sanction bodies have a windscreen spec for thickness/composition/material for open or enclosed cockpits? |
Originally Posted by Gripenland
(Post 3549990)
The HANS device was invented to prevent basilar scull fractures. A fracture that occurred in formula cars, high G accidents, with a very reclined seating position and heavy full face helmets. Conditions that put a lot of strain on the base of the scull.
Offshore powerboat accidents are usually moderate G accidents, upright seating, and lighter helmets. Are basilar skull fractures a common problem in offshore racing? If so, HANS or other head and neck restrains should be adopted by as many as possible. If not, the risk of the HANS getting stuck when evacuating should be considered. Just my 2 cents. Yes they are somewhat common. Bobby Saccenti had one for example in the Apache cat back in the day. Do not recall the death causes of Mark Lavin and Stefano Casiraghi but wouldn' t count it out. Theres little risk in a Hans getting stuck when evacuating IMO. It hasn't been a risk in racecars either where fire is always a threat. Once you get used to wearing it you do not even notice it racing. |
Getting offtopic.
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3550107)
I spent several years as an aircraft mechanic at MIA, and worked flightline damage repairs daily, and 3 or 4 direct runway crashes, I never saw a windscreen that *tore* away like these did, we did have heavy hail and bird damage, but not a *tear* situation...
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...ml#post3550087 |
Originally Posted by BUIZILLA
(Post 3550107)
I guess my basic simple question is > does the current offshore sanction bodies have a windscreen spec for thickness/composition/material for open or enclosed cockpits?
Here are a few: WPPA Class 1 and X-cat: Polycarbonate min 12 mm UIM 3C: Polycarbonate or similar, tandem min 7.9 mm side-by-side min 9.5 mm LUCAS OIL DRAG BOAT RACING SERIES: Polycarbonate min 0.5" before hot forming |
Request to all..lets take the tech stuff to appropriate thread...
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...struction.html |
Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
(Post 3550122)
"Take your question direct to Skater. The general internet public won't know the answer."
|
Originally Posted by MikeyFIN
(Post 3550152)
Boat racers ain't the general internet public...WE THINK!
|
Excuse my possible ignorance here as I am not a plastics expert. Why are they not using Lexan on the canopy windows instead of polycarbonate?? There must be some reason I am unaware of?
Best Regards, Ray @ Raylar |
Originally Posted by Raylar
(Post 3550669)
Excuse my possible ignorance here as I am not a plastics expert. Why are they not using Lexan on the canopy windows instead of polycarbonate?? There must be some reason I am unaware of?
Best Regards, Ray @ Raylar |
Told you I wasn't a plastics expert. I learn something new almost every day!
Best Regards, Ray @ Raylar:grinser010: |
[QUOTE=MikeyFIN;3550130]The Stuffs are plus violent rollovers are high G impacts up to 25G was measured for example at Casiraghis crash.
Yes they are somewhat common. Bobby Saccenti had one for example in the Apache cat back in the day. Do not recall the death causes of Mark Lavin and Stefano Casiraghi but wouldn' t count it out.QUOTE] Probably doesn't matter much but I recall Casiraghi's cat the old KAPPA as a stand-up boat not a sit down. The cockpit had a sling in it where you rested your rear end and kind of swung in it with feet on the ground. If it was rough you could use that sling and stand behind it so when you stood your legs couldn't kick out front. Don't know for a fact but recall talk that was how he was in the boat so when it stuffed it could not get thrown out easily, kind of folded around the sling where as the co-pilot was thrown out of the boat - again 20 years ago? |
Originally Posted by MikeyFIN
(Post 3550152)
Boat racers ain't the general internet public...WE THINK!
Thanks again for the pics and for not watermarking them. I'm going to print the whole sequence on 8x10 photo paper as soon as I get more ink. :) |
The new Fury windscreen uses laminated stretched acrylic provided by Triumph Aerospace, this transparency is capable of withstanding 500mph bird strike as compared to 350 mph for polycarbonate
|
lexan is, as i recall, GE's trade name for their polycarbonate plastic...just like pepsi is a trade name for cola...
|
Are canopies multi-layered like bullet proof glass or car windshields so it can absorb impact or of if/when the break they don't shatter?
|
Originally Posted by nikonmiami
(Post 3550839)
lexan is, as i recall, GE's trade name for their polycarbonate plastic...just like pepsi is a trade name for cola...
Either way I think the general publics acknowledgement of safety is a good thing If it helps save someones life and you never know whos knowledge from work experience in another field may help contribute to the next great safety innovation Open dialog is a good thing as long as its respectful Just my opinion |
Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
(Post 3550831)
I know! That quote about the "general internet public" was directly from the person who posted the question. He told me to "call Peter at Skater" because the "general internet public won't know"! lol :)
|
Hans should be mandatory whenever helmets are required.
I recently crashed my car at 182 mph-guardrail hit, thankfully the hans did its job no neck injuries. There was fire in the car also I had no problem getting out with the added hardware. |
I've been reading this post since the crash.....their are some good points and their are a lot of NO KNOWLEGE opinions.
1. Our canopy is multi-laminated, this design would not work with a roll bar.....the roll bar would make the canopy to rigid (like glass). It was made to flex. 2. The canopy flexed during the high speed impact and then eventually broke....the point is, it did take the initial impact, THAT IS WHAT SAVED OUR LIVES. Most people have no idea of the amount of pressure water has during a 115mph stuff 3. Could safety be improved? THERE IS ALWAYS ROOM FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. 4. Will we learn from this accident? We'd be idiots not to build a better mouse trap here. 5. I was in the boat....DANNY and I LIVED, without to much injury......The boat and canopy did their job, for this type of accident. END OF STORY MikeyFIN...thanks for the backup |
Originally Posted by Apache041
(Post 3556185)
I've been reading this post since the crash.....their are some good points and their are a lot of NO KNOWLEGE opinions.
1. Our canopy is multi-laminated, this design would not work with a roll bar.....the roll bar would make the canopy to rigid (like glass). It was made to flex. 2. The canopy flexed during the high speed impact and then eventually broke....the point is, it did take the initial impact, THAT IS WHAT SAVED OUR LIVES. Most people have no idea of the amount of pressure water has during a 115mph stuff 3. Could safety be improved? THERE IS ALWAYS ROOM FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. 4. Will we learn from this accident? We'd be idiots not to build a better mouse trap here. 5. I was in the boat....DANNY and I LIVED, without to much injury......The boat and canopy did their job, for this type of accident. END OF STORY MikeyFIN...thanks for the backup |
Took nikonmiami's pictures and made a gif of the accident, glad they are ok.
http://limestonedev.com/tmp/WP2.gif |
Originally Posted by GLH
(Post 3556696)
Took nikonmiami's pictures and made a gif of the accident, glad they are ok.
http://limestonedev.com/tmp/WP2.gif |
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3556766)
GL.....it's Thanksgiving. Couldn't just one frame be that boob shot you always post? Be a giver okay? :)
http://i473.photobucket.com/albums/r...2/ewasonne.gif |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e87HIlOIYFA
This link was posted on another thread here, think more than likely this shows how the Warpaint canopy might have failed. I doubt the Warpaint canopy it is designed to flex this much which lead to it's failure when it is impacted as it was in the stuff...this shows that the Warpaint canopy needs to be re-enforced. I don't intend to upset anyone here, and I am happy and relieved that the crew Bob and Danny were not seriously hurt but that might have been all down to luck. We really need to get serious about our safety. |
Originally Posted by Apache041
(Post 3556185)
I've been reading this post since the crash.....their are some good points and their are a lot of NO KNOWLEGE opinions.
1. Our canopy is multi-laminated, this design would not work with a roll bar.....the roll bar would make the canopy to rigid (like glass). It was made to flex. 2. The canopy flexed during the high speed impact and then eventually broke....the point is, it did take the initial impact, THAT IS WHAT SAVED OUR LIVES. Most people have no idea of the amount of pressure water has during a 115mph stuff 3. Could safety be improved? THERE IS ALWAYS ROOM FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. 4. Will we learn from this accident? We'd be idiots not to build a better mouse trap here. 5. I was in the boat....DANNY and I LIVED, without to much injury......The boat and canopy did their job, for this type of accident. END OF STORY MikeyFIN...thanks for the backup With the design of your canopy, would a roll cage which was designed to "limit" the flexability of the canopy be feasable? In otherwords, There would be an airgap, or slamm crush structure, between the canopy, and the cage. After initial deformation of the canopy, the cage would then strategically support the canopy to reduce further deformation. As you said, there is always room for improvement in safety. Just as these boats are safer than they were ten years ago, they will continue to become safer in the future. Darrell. |
Originally Posted by Apache041
(Post 3556185)
I've been reading this post since the crash.....their are some good points and their are a lot of NO KNOWLEGE opinions.
1. Our canopy is multi-laminated, this design would not work with a roll bar.....the roll bar would make the canopy to rigid (like glass). It was made to flex. 2. The canopy flexed during the high speed impact and then eventually broke....the point is, it did take the initial impact, THAT IS WHAT SAVED OUR LIVES. Most people have no idea of the amount of pressure water has during a 115mph stuff 3. Could safety be improved? THERE IS ALWAYS ROOM FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. 4. Will we learn from this accident? We'd be idiots not to build a better mouse trap here. 5. I was in the boat....DANNY and I LIVED, without to much injury......The boat and canopy did their job, for this type of accident. END OF STORY MikeyFIN...thanks for the backup |
Originally Posted by FREEDOM US1
(Post 3557019)
. Theres a small group of people working together to make the boats safer. Some manufactures listen better then others.
|
Originally Posted by Gripenland
(Post 3557193)
Can you tell us anything more about this?
|
Originally Posted by nikonmiami
(Post 3549540)
i was on the sebago, shooting into the sun most of the day and super choppy...was not a pleasureable afternoon
|
Originally Posted by FREEDOM US1
(Post 3557549)
Take a good look at Mystics and Doug Wrights Newer boats as well as the Citron. I build the thicker laminated WS for these boats as well as discuss installation methods using extra thick inner flanges with outer retainers to help hold the WS in place instead of blowing out. We also reduced size of exposed WS to help reduce the amount of energy it has to over come when the boat stuffs or rolls. These designs will still fail at some point but will hang in there much better then whats out there. I build and install aerospace windshield for a living and raced for 5 years in the 90s. Two years in a 28 skater and three in Bobs 46 Skaters. By the way. I build thicker laminated windows for Skater on the newer boats but the only one I would be happy with is the way Talking Trash modified theirs by adding the outer retainer and reducing the amount of exposed window area. MTI has done a great job on some of their latest boat as well. I'm no billy Bad azz ruler of the world or anything but just doing some commonsense stuff to make the top of the boat as strong as the bottom in case you crash.
Another consideration is that in the event of a flip, the water displaces everything, so on top of the carnage from the impact you have water displacing all the air and drivers possibly unconscious from the impact and water coming in from all around, you just took a horrible situation and made it worse. Is full time air now going to be mandatory? one of the safety checks for each team should be a working oxygen system, no worky, no racey... |
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 3557683)
Way to go Jim, to me thats the common sense way to approach it. I think one of the things that is overlooked by the masses is the sheer force of water and the intrusion factor is so much different that air. a canopy or a windshiled in air does have to remain intact to take a strike, air not being a solid will take the path of least resistance. water as a solid and being pressurized from a flip or a stuff with make its own path, generally at the weakest point, think of a water jet that is used to cut steel.
Another consideration is that in the event of a flip, the water displaces everything, so on top of the carnage from the impact you have water displacing all the air and drivers possibly unconscious from the impact and water coming in from all around, you just took a horrible situation and made it worse. Is full time air now going to be mandatory? one of the safety checks for each team should be a working oxygen system, no worky, no racey... |
Originally Posted by FREEDOM US1
(Post 3557549)
Take a good look at Mystics and Doug Wrights Newer boats as well as the Citron. I build the thicker laminated WS for these boats as well as discuss installation methods using extra thick inner flanges with outer retainers to help hold the WS in place instead of blowing out. We also reduced size of exposed WS to help reduce the amount of energy it has to over come when the boat stuffs or rolls. These designs will still fail at some point but will hang in there much better then whats out there.
I guess they are polycarbonate wind screens? How thick are they? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.