![]() |
Originally Posted by LapseofReason
(Post 3753977)
That's crazy, I think my last insurance would pay up to 20 million ( i would have to go look it up to be sure ) in damages for property and loss of life and and hazmat clean up. I payed like 6k a year with a 3 month lay up. You would need to put I would think at least 5 mil aside to cover when / if you kill someone, wouldn't that money be better out making you more.
|
Originally Posted by teamsynergy
(Post 3754027)
Geee... waves.... made by a boat (cruiser) ... on a open body of water.... in a wake zone and you are faulting and trying to hang the cruiser owner... remind me NEVER to boat where you guys do. Whether you run 50, 70, 90, 120, 150, 190... guess what... you read/scan whats in front of you all the time. You make adjustments. If the conditions don't allow for "x" speed, you don't do it. Oh wait, thats the logical side of me coming out. Yeah, speed is fun, poker runs are fun, however, let this **** die.. the my way crew ****ed up, took a wave wrong in an OPEN BODY OF WATER when WAVES CAN BE MADE and screwed their boat up. Luckily no one was hurt! This time. Will this inject some common sense or maybe make some people think twice about certain conditions or surroundings prior to hammering down? Maybe.... but in this case... probably not. Flame me if you want but reading through all this bull**** if freaking ridiculous... going after the cruiser... give me a break.... if he was being malicious and doing circles trying to make waves for jetski's...sure... but the guy was enroute somewhere...
You may continue on your waste of bandwidth... enjoy! |
I've read the majority of this, and I'm afraid I'll get chastised for any comment, but here goes nothing...
Other than the obvious endangerment of our sport and public perception bandwagons, where is the harm in taking a calculated risk when the victim regardless of outcome would only be the one taking said risk I know, just like everyone else this is only speculating and theorizing, but let's say Bill T. and crew took a look down river, could see for miles. There were no boats or PWCs even capable of cutting in front of them... only traffic on the horizon was parallel to them and far enough to either side to not be a factor in any incident. Then and only then do they decide to stretch My Ways' legs. Knowing that if it all comes unglued, the only person(s) to be hurt are those taking the risk. Judging by the video, and the amount of time that elapsed after the boats passed one another, I'd say that there was a pretty damn fair distance kept to the port of the Sea Ray. Everyone has jumped on the bandwagon that others could have lost life, etc, but something has got to be said for 2 incidents and no residual casualties or losses. Maybe luck, or maybe a great sense of situational awareness and the rationalization that Bill T. only stretches it out when he feels that even in a worst case scenario, him and his property is all that may end up wadded up. Just food for thought. |
"Out of control cowboy" is what the boat should be named. Videos show it well.
If he had "situational awarenees" he would not of been running on the raged edge in a open waterway hitting the wake as he did. |
What if the boat hooks left and takes out 3 or four of the spectator boats? It is the "What If" that is the problem. And really it isn't a MATTER OF "WHAT iF" BUT "wHEN".
Run that thing in open waters where boats aren't anchored all over the place. Or in a "shoot out" closed coures environment. Not saying the guy shouldn't be able to run the piss out of his boat, just pick a safer time and place. Lets say(for argument sake) the incident was a bit more sever. Let's say "My Way" had a complete blow over. It only involved their boat, no spectators were injured at all. Just the crew of My Way. Yes, they knew the risks, but even so, the insurance comapnies that back these runs, will not see it the same way. It would still be a black eye on the sport regardles of who's equipment was busted up. The point I am trying to make is human life lost or injured, regardless of who it is will still raises eyebrows across the industry. A poker run does not have the safety personel or precautions in place like a sancioned race or shootout would. Thank God the above senario didn't happen, and I hope it never does. But lets be realistic, with this type of motorsport, the risks and dangers are there. We need to make sure that the recreational boaters (in this case poker runner) don't loose their sport because a few guys with deep pockets are turning the poker run into a shootout. There are plenty of sanctioned shootouts and races where these boats can show the world what they have. |
..
|
Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
(Post 3754161)
..
|
Originally Posted by Downtown42
(Post 3753778)
You are a lawyer and probaly tried to sue the wake that flipped your boat and crew last year. What was the result?
For the record, I have no beef with lawyers as most do. |
Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
(Post 3754161)
..
|
Originally Posted by X-Rated30
(Post 3754174)
You are correct in that I am a lawyer. I rolled and it was my fault. You assume I probably tried to sue the owner of the boat that caused the wake. This makes me assume you are a d!ckhead that makes incorrect assumptions. I can prove I never tried to sue anyone, much less the owner of the cruiser. Can you prove you are not a d!ckhead that makes incorrect assumptions?
Ps: OSO - you are free to delete this as inflammatory, but I hope you will delete his post as well. Personal attacks are not needed. I'm sorry if people disagree with the law, but I quoted straight from the United States Code. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.