I like #4 and #5

?????????????????????????????

I should have had Tim photo shop the 2x4 out that was under my boat in this picture Oh and this is what a good photo is supposed to look like no way would I pay that much for any of them, this one plus two more were $50.00

Well...The water looks muddy and ugly, you've got someone taking a pic back at the chopper, the corner of the boat is cut off and the running attitude looks awkward! No offense, but that's what you get for 50 bucks!

It's all good. I agree with your words.

Thanks Jayboat. I think its more that I'm not up to speed on all the text, blog, message shorthand.

Sharkey Images should be embarrassed to have their name watermarked on that picture a couple of posts back.

I had asked Tim to cut the rear corner off there was a dirt spot on it. As as for the the person taking the picture he was a friend of a friend who was in Afghanistan 24 hours early he could have done what ever he wanted on my boat. I considered it an honor to have him as my guest. Tim did offer to fly ahead and clean the river but it was an extra $20.00 so I declined. As for the boats attitude, ahhhh its pretty good not sure what you are looking at or if you know how a stepped hull works.

Just saying why the pic was so cheap. For more $ they could have fixed the flaw without cutting off the corner of the boat and put nice looking water around it. Maybe photo shop the picture taker using another photo of him. It looks like the boat is listing like maybe you are riding the side of a wave. Sorry, I'm just saying that it's not magazine cover material which is what BoatPix promises. I'll find out. They are giving my pics one more work over. I sure hope they get it right. I really like the two pics that I chose.

Yeah the pics that BoatPix edited for you sure look like magazine cover material.