Time for a rebuild. Which way to go NA or Supercharged?
03-21-2013 | 07:35 AM
#61
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Thanks for all the responses. I am going to stick with my current set up. I am very happy with it and doesn't make sense to change. Sounds like some people love N/A but to risk my "happiness" is not a comforting thought.
one thing for sure is to get the right size blower.
Eddie, thanks for your input, I will be in touch.
one thing for sure is to get the right size blower.
Eddie, thanks for your input, I will be in touch.
03-21-2013 | 08:40 AM
#62
Registered
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
LOL 
I'm running Tall deck N/A engines that dyno'ed right at 800HP @5900. All of the best parts and a fantastic hydraulic roller setup that let's them idle about 650 rpm's around the dock in gear. They are 9.6 to 1, run 93 octane fuel and have 210 hours on them without having removed the valve covers. I'm curious to see how long they last as they aren't showing any signs of weakness.......yet
I will agree that the blower motors win the "cool factor" vs. N/A!
I'm running Tall deck N/A engines that dyno'ed right at 800HP @5900. All of the best parts and a fantastic hydraulic roller setup that let's them idle about 650 rpm's around the dock in gear. They are 9.6 to 1, run 93 octane fuel and have 210 hours on them without having removed the valve covers. I'm curious to see how long they last as they aren't showing any signs of weakness.......yet
I will agree that the blower motors win the "cool factor" vs. N/A!
