Original Spectre Molds Repossessed From Arrow/Frisini
06-03-2014 | 07:57 AM
#391
Registered
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,904
Likes: 1,143
Get the boat and enjoy it. Even if you have to keep it forever who cares it Mich better then getting nothing. They will NEVER pay you. Don't pay them the remainder either just take the boat and let them try to chase you for the extra money. Possession is 9/10th of the law. Take the damn boat man and you will have the support of OSO to get what's yours.
1. No title
2. Possession is 9/10's, great pay a car dealer 99% of what the deal is then drive off in the car.....you would be arrested for grand theft auto.
3. Support of OSO......that would be comforting to know while trying to make bail!
06-03-2014 | 09:15 AM
#392
Registered
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,614
Likes: 375
From: Traverse City MI
This is a FAIL on many levels......
1. No title
2. Possession is 9/10's, great pay a car dealer 99% of what the deal is then drive off in the car.....you would be arrested for grand theft auto.
3. Support of OSO......that would be comforting to know while trying to make bail!
1. No title
2. Possession is 9/10's, great pay a car dealer 99% of what the deal is then drive off in the car.....you would be arrested for grand theft auto.
3. Support of OSO......that would be comforting to know while trying to make bail!
He shouldn't have to but ok pay the remainder of the balance, which chuck says the dealer controls, and pick up the boat. No one has to know he has the boat at first, until frisini backs down. It doesn't sound like frisini has the money to go after chuck anyways and Chuck should have proof to prove his case if he does. If its so easy for chuck to get into trouble then why is it so hard to get frisini?
There is no easy way in this situation but IF Chucks story is true, and the boat gets paid for 100% to the agreement he has on paper, then having the boat in Chucks possession makes more sense to me then never having anything. At least eventually Chuck can either use the boat or part the boat out. Both situations are better then having NO boat and NO money.
Please tell us your better plan...
Last edited by offshorexcursion; 06-03-2014 at 09:44 AM.
06-03-2014 | 09:38 AM
#394
Registered
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 1
From: Charlestown, IN
Chuck getting a judgement against the company means just that....the chances of getting paid will be none.. Now getting a judgement against the person himself is a different story. Appears to be a fraud case, hard to prove unless you have proper documentation. I have a judgement on a company that use to be on OSO, they still sell their product here...but have since changed the name of their originally company, and have skirted and abused the system and have run out of gas..its been a long drawn out 5 year ordeal. All I can say is..Don't give up, thats what he's hoping. Possibly work out a settlement to your liking. Honesty prevails in the end. Good Luck.
Jeff, first time I have seen you on in awhile, great to see you again. Hope all is well, Blue Skies, Robbie
06-03-2014 | 09:39 AM
#395
Registered
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Hillsboro, OR
This is a really bad deal! We funded chucks boat in full before it was complete. ( against our better judgement) but it's what the customer wanted.
We have also refunded another customer his deposit on a new build. The deposit was payed to frisini , but we refunded the customer with no input from frisini
We have also refunded another customer his deposit on a new build. The deposit was payed to frisini , but we refunded the customer with no input from frisini
06-03-2014 | 09:52 AM
#396
Registered
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,904
Likes: 1,143
Your comparison doesn't really work
He shouldn't have to but ok pay the remainder of the balance, which chuck says the dealer controls, and pick up the boat. No one has to know he has the boat at first, until frisini backs down. It doesn't sound like frisini has the money to go after chuck anyways and Chuck should have proof to prove his case if he does. If its so easy for chuck to get into trouble then why is it so hard to get frisini?
There is no easy way in this situation but IF Chucks story is true, and the boat gets paid for 100% to the agreement he has on paper, then having the boat in Chucks possession makes more sense to me then never having anything. At least eventually Chuck can either use the boat or part the boat out. Both situations are better then having NO boat and NO money.
Please tell us your better plan...
He shouldn't have to but ok pay the remainder of the balance, which chuck says the dealer controls, and pick up the boat. No one has to know he has the boat at first, until frisini backs down. It doesn't sound like frisini has the money to go after chuck anyways and Chuck should have proof to prove his case if he does. If its so easy for chuck to get into trouble then why is it so hard to get frisini?
There is no easy way in this situation but IF Chucks story is true, and the boat gets paid for 100% to the agreement he has on paper, then having the boat in Chucks possession makes more sense to me then never having anything. At least eventually Chuck can either use the boat or part the boat out. Both situations are better then having NO boat and NO money.
Please tell us your better plan...
