Trial Started for Boat Crash of 2008
#41
Thread Starter
OSO Content Provider

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,757
Likes: 112
From: Sharkey-Images.com
I do not. If they did view the cameras a lot more will be coming available . It can prove whether or not the Imperial had its lights on and also if there was another boat before him that came through the canal and which boats went away from the accident scene under the bridge just south of it. There was a thread here on OSO back when this was first discussed. Scarabman I believed confirmed in that thread another incident happened around the same time where a boat ran aground just south of the Mantoloking Bridge . Cattus Island park I think was the area. http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/3037943-post297.html
Last edited by SHARKEY-IMAGES; 04-06-2013 at 10:51 AM.
#42
Thread Starter
OSO Content Provider

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,757
Likes: 112
From: Sharkey-Images.com
I'm sure the cops took blood to have a blood test done...If not then they phucked up......................Also i did not look loke the kid tryed to hide the damage or tryed to buff the blue smudge off even tho the part of the boston whaler that was missing was all white...the blue botton may have caused a blue streek on the side of the imperial but like stated their should heve been a whole lot more damage to the inperial boat..
http://sharkeyimages.zenfolio.com/blog
.
#43
Thread Starter
OSO Content Provider

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,757
Likes: 112
From: Sharkey-Images.com
If this were the case the bow would not have damage on the starboard side either . I would think anyway.
#44
Registered
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 54
Likes: 2
Or the damage would be only on the side of the initial impact. Also would explain how the drive and all transom accessories would be untouched... Just an opinion though, I'm not a ballistic expert.
#45
Thread Starter
OSO Content Provider

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,757
Likes: 112
From: Sharkey-Images.com
The console is fairly high on the boat. As described the boat went over the top of the whaler. The whaler really would have gone done really deep for the hardware to clear all that.
#46
AKA "BAZOOKA JOE"
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
From: NEW JERSEY
From what I heard from a Very Reliable source, NJ State Police Marine Division brought in the Connecticut State Police Marine Investigation Team who are know to be 2nd to none and they did the complete investigation.......I'm sure there report will paint the picture.....from forensic testing of paint to fiberglass on both boats.
I am sure they all the footage Tim has mentioned and more.
OK so if he's innocent that he may be "I'm not the jury" But why pull your boat out of the water when its normally not a trailer queen? Why hide it? Wait until we hear about his witness, She is now his wife and I heard her dad a NJST and probably gave him advice and recommended he turn himself in. It just does not look good. We will all see how it plays out I'm sure it will be a short trial..........
I am sure they all the footage Tim has mentioned and more.
OK so if he's innocent that he may be "I'm not the jury" But why pull your boat out of the water when its normally not a trailer queen? Why hide it? Wait until we hear about his witness, She is now his wife and I heard her dad a NJST and probably gave him advice and recommended he turn himself in. It just does not look good. We will all see how it plays out I'm sure it will be a short trial..........
#48
Registered
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
I found the old thread
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...rick-nj-3.html
Check out this post:
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/2644287-post24.html
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...rick-nj-3.html
Check out this post:
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/2644287-post24.html
#49
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park, CA
But why pull your boat out of the water when its normally not a trailer queen? Why hide it? Wait until we hear about his witness, She is now his wife and I heard her dad a NJST and probably gave him advice and recommended he turn himself in. It just does not look good. We will all see how it plays out I'm sure it will be a short trial..........
Not that I think this is necessarily what happened but I think it would be easy to convey this to a jury causing the doubt needed by the defense.
One other thing all you legal eagles could answer for me is if in fact both parties were drunk or drinking and both on plane and hit each other. Let's say both parties were on scene and no one left the scene. Would anyone of the parties be more responsible for the injuries or wreck?
#50
Thread Starter
OSO Content Provider

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,757
Likes: 112
From: Sharkey-Images.com
Thanks for finding the old thread. Apparently another boat ran aground that night around the same time give or take? http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/3037943-post297.html


