Notices
General Boating Discussion

Crash at DS.

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-04-2013 | 05:30 PM
  #291  
Cat & Mice's Avatar
Charter Member
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Draper, Utah
Default

I doubt the boat was going 140 mph. The helicopters where still there and they do t go that fast. The boat slowed down a lot in the air. By the time it hit the water and hooked I bet it slowed down to around 50mph.

They will have a hard time hiding this accident from a potential buyer and I really doubt the guys at DCB would lie about it.


MP
Cat & Mice is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-2013 | 06:30 PM
  #292  
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,Az.
Default

More like 100-110 when he lost control.
skater40 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-2013 | 09:53 PM
  #293  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 22
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

bottom line is that Tony jumped the start. He had no choice in doing that or he would have been passed by skater40. Tony knew his boat was slower than gary and his only shot to get to the springs first was to jump the start.
pslonaker is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 01:16 AM
  #294  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 596
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by pslonaker
bottom line is that Tony jumped the start. He had no choice in doing that or he would have been passed by skater40. Tony knew his boat was slower than gary and his only shot to get to the springs first was to jump the start.
finally someone tells it right. the 41 is not that fast when compared to like boats. it barely went any faster than collegewood in the sh00tout and the 41 is much lighter and was proped for the run. i think the two boats are about the same length, 41 minus their bussel is probably a 38 bottom too. had the 41 followed the instructions, held his line and didnt try to jump he could have saved one of his fellow dcb a butt load of $$ that day.
Boatlesss is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 02:39 AM
  #295  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: lake ozark
Default

well if the 41 jumped didn't the 35 go with him?
lotopa.com is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 05:55 AM
  #296  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

they way i see it the guy that fliped his boat was at fault he is responsible for his own actions and could have let off the gas and could have turned left. he did not have to go thru the 41"s roostertale.
skaterjim is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 08:49 AM
  #297  
Nice Pair's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Bethel Island, CA
Default

Since it was a poker run , NOT a race, I'd say there were at least 2) overly aggressive drivers jumping the start. ....... my .02
Nice Pair is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 09:45 AM
  #298  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 175
Default

Originally Posted by skaterjim
they way i see it the guy that fliped his boat was at fault he is responsible for his own actions and could have let off the gas and could have turned left. he did not have to go thru the 41"s roostertale.
Hey Skater Jim- good to see someone has common sense... Been absent from this thread for obvious reasons lately. It's still funny to me that some think it's the other guys fault, and not the actual person DRIVING the boat that flipped!! People are so freakin ignorant it's funny!
precisiondetails is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 09:56 AM
  #299  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lotopa.com
well if the 41 jumped didn't the 35 go with him?
DUH well yeah :-)
PRIMECUT is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2013 | 02:16 PM
  #300  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: lake ozark
Default

so can we all agree that Jumping the start was not the cause of the Accident?...... SkaterJim and precision details and i share the same opinion, so if we start eliminating variables in the cause of the accident I think the only thing left standing will be " could the 35 have pulled back? and did he?" I believe the answers to these two questions are obvious but would love to understand a different point of view, however they just dont make sense......

Its like being on my street bike at 130 mph and blaming the car i rear ended..... that will never fly in court...
lotopa.com is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.