Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
triple vs twin on gas consumption ? >

triple vs twin on gas consumption ?

Notices
General Boating Discussion

triple vs twin on gas consumption ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-17-2013 | 07:37 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RT930turbo
+1

Everybody who HAS OWNED them, seems to make the same claims. I'm not the least bit scared of trips...
Nothing to be scard of, trips have their place.,but there all several things to consider. I had both a bravo boat and a 6 boat. My preference would be a twin 6 boat? Over either triple

Last edited by Trumascape; 06-17-2013 at 07:41 PM.
Trumascape is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2013 | 10:43 AM
  #22  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by Flyin-Bryan
Which triple Boats have You owned?
None thank god...
GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2013 | 11:03 AM
  #23  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: Ma
Default

Originally Posted by GLH
None thank god...
Big surprise that was.
Flyin-Bryan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2013 | 04:05 PM
  #24  
bajaholic's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 366
From: 20.5 mm LOTO
Default

Did I mention?: One constant I have learned though in the last number of years, all the experts of why not to have a triple have came from those that have never had them.
bajaholic is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2013 | 04:44 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: CapeComa,FL
Default

Ok.....I'm in....
commandersander is offline  
Reply
Old 06-22-2013 | 12:49 AM
  #26  
jeff32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,230
Likes: 580
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

on the other hand... any twin with number 6 for sale in the 50 to 70k range? I doubt, so it might be a solution to run 80 mph without spending 100k plus...
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-22-2013 | 01:13 AM
  #27  
J-Bonz's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,980
Likes: 499
From: Cleveland, OH / Pewaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by RT930turbo
'm not the least bit scared of trips...
Two engines are hard enough to work around............. 3 I think would be just a little more funner..... I think I could handle trips also........... Especially if its a 47 apache.
J-Bonz is offline  
Reply
Old 06-22-2013 | 09:19 AM
  #28  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Originally Posted by Flyin-Bryan
Big surprise that was.
I've had a couple boats however. But your right what the f@ck do I know.

That last one was only a twin but I had five engines for it. Does that count? Actually now that I think of it I still have three of those five engines... That would make me a triple owner wouldn't it?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]503175[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]503176[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]503173[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]503174[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]503177[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]503178[/ATTACH]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWezQgnhGok
Attached Thumbnails triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-1243000tig_fl2.jpg   triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-000cig1.jpg   triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-640fountain.jpg  

triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-cafe.jpg   triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-mut.jpg   triple vs twin on gas consumption ?-5168251440_79eb0f7dfe_b.jpg  

GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 06-22-2013 | 09:34 AM
  #29  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 55
From: Cape coral, FL
Default

Never owned trips. Not scared of the fuel consumption at all. Already have side by side twins an they are a pia to work on. Would hate to climb over one to work on 2 more. Haha
Crude Intentions is offline  
Reply
Old 06-22-2013 | 10:28 AM
  #30  
bajaholic's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 366
From: 20.5 mm LOTO
Default

I still think some are still missing a MAJOR point. You are using smaller engines to achieve the same speed as the LARGER displacement/HP twins. I Think everyone can agree 6's are by far the preferred choice on an open budget, but in order to turn those drives you need BIG power, which requires WAY more mechanical ability, including more in depth maintenance and of course WAY deeper pockets overall.

As far as cost of boat, here is a secret, A TRIPLE BOAT IS CHEAPER TO BEGIN WITH!!!!!

When we ordered our Baja in 07, We looked at ordering it with Twin 525's or the Triple 496's. The Twin 525 set up was $17,000 more than the triple 496's and guess what, the 525's were 6mph slower. As I stated earlier, you would have had to step up to 575's to get the same speed, ie: More original cost yet! So a triple boat may appear to cost less on resale, but that is only a relative factor, because they were less to begin with...

Just to recap: I am NOT saying, those that have added LARGE triple engines to their boats are not experiencing a higher cost, BUT even if you ran triple 575's, you need to run 1075's or better in a twin to get the same speed... The numbers change, but it is still the same ratio. Bigger is always better.... Until you have to pay to keep them running...

As far as working on a triple boat, there was plenty of room top climb around in the bilge. the only real issue was working around the exhaust from the front engine. No matter what boat you are working on, there is never enough room for us "larger" people...

Last edited by bajaholic; 06-22-2013 at 10:35 AM.
bajaholic is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.