Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
LOTO MSWP Man Overboard Drowning >

LOTO MSWP Man Overboard Drowning

Notices
General Boating Discussion

LOTO MSWP Man Overboard Drowning

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-16-2014 | 06:48 AM
  #171  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
From: Cape Coral, Fl/LOTO
Default

I don't know who I'm worried about the most on LOTO now, some dumb boater or a stupid untrained WP officer without any common sense that legally carries a gun, what a fiasco.

The State of Missouri Water Patrol has become a joke...........................and not a funny one.
314joey is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2014 | 07:00 AM
  #172  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 1
From: MA
Default

Listen to tape. Disgusting. .....
Cop is a ignorant stupid ****. He has the kid and let him drown because he is too stupid to operate his boat and gear.

Fire this ******* asap
scarab63 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2014 | 07:28 AM
  #173  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 1
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by Speedracer29
Hearsay rules, failure to train, failure to exercise the highest amount of care, failure to maintain a safe and prudent speed.
All of these will come into play over the course of the civil trial. And, judging by the tape, the tragic events were set into motion by a belligerent suspect and the lawyer-wannabe/jackazz/friend that jumped in to "save" the suspect from incriminating himself, followed by an officer who chose to take shortcuts. Readjusting the jacket and cuffs situation at a safe distance may have indeed saved this kid's life. Likewise, if the friend would have realized the lake wasn't a courtroom, stayed in his boat, STFU, and LET THE OFFICER DO HIS JOB, we may not be conversing about this terrible situation.

Pay a settlement, fire the officer, train the next batch better. Drowning caused the death, the officer's inaction led to it, and the actions of the suspect and his friend put it all in motion.
Why keep pointing the finger at everyone else? It was the stupid ass cop that killed the kid and almost himself. Even his colleagues are throwing him under the bus. If he was properly trained or gave a **** he could have idled 200' away and done things correctly.
He didn't care. He is the law and he makes the rules except this time he did what he wanted and it bit him in the ass. I hope he pays and it haunts him. I HATE cops like this.

Cowboy.......and a boarderline retarded liar on top of it all.

Last edited by scarab63; 09-16-2014 at 07:39 AM.
scarab63 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2014 | 08:55 AM
  #174  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by scarab63
Why keep pointing the finger at everyone else? It was the stupid ass cop that killed the kid and almost himself. Even his colleagues are throwing him under the bus. If he was properly trained or gave a **** he could have idled 200' away and done things correctly.
He didn't care. He is the law and he makes the rules except this time he did what he wanted and it bit him in the ass. I hope he pays and it haunts him. I HATE cops like this.

Cowboy.......and a boarderline retarded liar on top of it all.
I'm not pointing fingers for the drowning responsibility, that rests on the officer. But this is definitely a case of "What They Should Have Done Theatre", and should be used as learning experience by all parties so this guy's death isn't in vain. Actions have consequences, sometimes severe and unintended.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2014 | 10:36 PM
  #175  
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 3
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

A little update to this I just stumbled across on the Facebooks

http://www.abc17news.com/news/troope...t-kid/29779624
HiPerf360 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2014 | 11:25 PM
  #176  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 396
Likes: 29
From: Patuxent River, Maryland
Default

It just gets worse and worse. Im not surprised at all, but a bunch of earlier commenters on this thread were falling all over themselves to excuse the cops of any wrongdoing. Besides what happened on the night, its a travesty of justice that so many relevant details of the case (which show the cop's actions in a negative light) were swept under the rug during the inquest.

Regarding that news link HiPerf360 posted, it states "A memory card was missing from Piercy's boat on May 31, meaning there is no concrete proof of how Ellingson fell off the boat." Anybody know what that mean? Are we talking memory card from a camera that was supposed to be filming on the boat?
blown is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2014 | 06:01 AM
  #177  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Its funny how this total fukkup can be called an "accident" by authorities when they critique themselves, yet if any one of us got into a miner traffic "accident" it is referred to as a crash by the same people which leads to a citation. No fukking accountability and the attempted cover up makes me nauseous. If it was any one of us not in uniform we would have been charged with something like negligent homicide.
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2014 | 06:51 AM
  #178  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by JRider
If it was any one of us not in uniform we would have been charged with something like negligent homicide.
No, you would have been charged with kidnapping. You shouldn't drive around with drunk teenaged men handcuffed on your boat. It's illegal. And creepy. And you're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2014 | 07:05 AM
  #179  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Apples to oranges my A$$. If you are trying to be cute and funny you surely are neither. The point being this officer was negligent. Idiotic the way you interpret and attempt twist what I posted.

Last edited by JRider; 11-21-2014 at 07:08 AM.
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2014 | 07:24 AM
  #180  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

I twisted NOTHING. You fail to understand the standards, burdens, and differences between civil negligence (proponderance of evidence), and criminal negligence (beyond a reasonable doubt). The inquest was the criminal aspect, the civil proceedings haven't been completed. There are literally hundreds of cases every year where criminal charges don't result in a conviction, and civil process awards damages, both punitive and compensatory.
The "in uniform" has little to do with the results here, other than it gave him authority to question and detain.

Last edited by Speedracer29; 11-21-2014 at 07:28 AM.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.