![]() |
Originally Posted by 1MOSES1
(Post 4245802)
i did do the research...if the F2 boat runs 78 at equal weight, several T/S 500 EFI owners have stated 82-83 as there top speed in seperate threads. The difference is 4-5 mph. Which equates to about 5-7% efficiency (weight being negligible).
|
Originally Posted by cig92
(Post 4245817)
you are not comparing apples to apples lol. you really think the f2 boat is at all similar to a standard straight bottom? blue printed bottom, high x etc etc. ask outlast33 on here how fast his boat runs. it a 92 38 tg standard lay up with merc 500 hp, fresh rebuilds to merc specs, then you will have your real world comparison. i believe it runs around 70 and if i'm correct that's a bit more than 6-7% difference from a twin step
the F2 comparison is more apples to apples from a weight perspective than a run of the mill heavy 90's flat bottom gun. im willing to bet if i stripped my hull down to the F2 weight (and TS weight) we'd come close to 78...id venture probably 76. |
Originally Posted by benjen
(Post 4245741)
It's winter, it's 20 degrees
http://33outlaw.zenfolio.com/img/s3/...84590020-2.jpg |
Originally Posted by cig92
(Post 4245817)
you are not comparing apples to apples lol. you really think the f2 boat is at all similar to a standard straight bottom? blue printed bottom, high x etc etc. ask outlast33 on here how fast his boat runs. it a 92 38 tg standard lay up with merc 500 hp, fresh rebuilds to merc specs, then you will have your real world comparison. i believe it runs around 70 and if i'm correct that's a bit more than 6-7% difference from a twin step
|
Originally Posted by cigrocket
(Post 4245826)
Correct, and his is a bravo boat. This thread belongs in the Cigarette forum so owners can comment, not left up to "personal opinions", "cousins opinions", "I knew a guy situations" or I used to have a boat comments.
|
Winter summary of this thread.........
T/S are junk unless you own one Straight Bottoms are better if you are trying to sell one to buy a T/S |
Originally Posted by cigrocket
(Post 4245831)
Winter summary of this thread.........
T/S are junk unless you own one Straight Bottoms are better if you are trying to sell one to buy a T/S |
Originally Posted by 47EXCALIBUR
(Post 4245781)
Herb ill run next to you next year in my OL to verify your top speed. Then we wont have to deal with Billy being the GPS police :) Granted i do have 5 steps in my hull, i might have to push it 5k rpm to keep up :):)
|
Ok, look at it the other way, add 3,000 pounds to a 500 EFI twin step and see what it runs, , now you are comparing apples to apples...
Does everyone agree a 9500lb twin step with 500 EFI's runs low 80's?? If yes, then you have to compare it to a 9500lb flat bottom with no cabin and 500EFI's to figure out what the steps are really doing. To compare the boats at 3000lb difference doesn't tell you jack about the steps effectiveness, it just tells you a lighter boat is faster... |
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4245837)
Ok, look at it the other way, add 3,000 pounds to a 500 EFI twin step and see what it runs, , now you are comparing apples to apples...
Does everyone agree a 9500lb twin step with 500 EFI's runs low 80's?? If yes, then you have to compare it to a 9500lb flat bottom with no cabin and 500EFI's to figure out what the steps are really doing. To compare the boats at 3000lb difference doesn't tell you jack about the steps effectiveness, it just tells you a lighter boat is faster... Lighter Layups, vacuum bagged, steps, notches, it all makes a difference. I cant believe no fountain guys have chimed in about steps. All I know is when I used to throttle down the 93 gun, it was like hitting the airbreaks on a truck. When Iet off the throttle on the TS, the boat glides for a while on the air cushion and coasts until I hit the throttles again. It doesn't settle in and stop. It just seems more agile, whether it is STEPS, LAYUP, OR WEIGHT. The boat is more efficient. and the Technology is better. And I know that I have an 01 TS and I am sure the 07 and later ones are better and I already know that the staggered 39 is even better, |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.